• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腰痛急诊就诊期间的影像学检查:基于索赔数据的描述性分析。

Imaging during low back pain ED visits: a claims-based descriptive analysis.

作者信息

Schlemmer Erin, Mitchiner James C, Brown Michael, Wasilevich Elizabeth

机构信息

Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan, Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Detroit, MI 48226-2998, USA.

Department of Emergency Medicine, St. Joseph Mercy Hospital, Ann Arbor, MI 48106.

出版信息

Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Mar;33(3):414-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2014.12.060. Epub 2014 Dec 31.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajem.2014.12.060
PMID:25624075
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Low back pain (LBP) is a common reason for emergency department (ED) visits. This study aimed to determine the frequency and type of nonindicated imaging during LBP ED visits and to describe demographic and prior health care use characteristics among the nonindicated population.

METHODS

This study included index ED events for LBP occurring during 2011 through 2012 for Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan commercial members ages 18 to 64 years. We identified LBP imaging indications within 12 months before the index event. Frequency estimates of patient demographics, imaging prevalence, type of imaging, and prior health care use characteristics stratified by imaging and indication status are presented with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

Of the 14838 total events, 51.9% (95% CI, 51.1%-52.7%) did not have indications for imaging. Patients without imaging indications were less likely to have had ED visits, hospital stays, LBP, lower back imaging, primary care physician visits, and back-related specialist visits in the past year compared with patients with indications. Among nonindicated patients, 30.1% (95% CI, 29.1%-31.1%) received imaging; of these, 26.2% received advanced imaging (computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging). Nonindicated patients who received imaging were slightly older than those who did not receive imaging (27.6% [95% CI, 25.8%-29.4%] were ages 55-64 years vs 20.6% [95% CI, 19.6%-21.7%]) and had a higher prevalence of observation/treatment room use (7.3% [95% CI, 6.2%-8.4%] vs 1.2% [95% CI, 0.9%-1.4%]).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that a substantial proportion of the patient population presenting to the ED for LBP receives nonindicated imaging, revealing opportunities to reduce costs and radiation exposure.

摘要

目的

腰痛(LBP)是急诊科(ED)就诊的常见原因。本研究旨在确定腰痛患者在急诊科就诊期间非必要成像检查的频率和类型,并描述非必要成像检查人群的人口统计学特征和既往医疗保健使用情况。

方法

本研究纳入了2011年至2012年期间密歇根蓝十字蓝盾商业保险覆盖的18至64岁会员因腰痛在急诊科的首次就诊事件。我们确定了首次就诊事件前12个月内腰痛成像检查的指征。按成像检查和指征状态分层呈现患者人口统计学、成像检查患病率、成像检查类型以及既往医疗保健使用情况特征的频率估计值,并给出95%置信区间(CI)。

结果

在14838例总事件中,51.9%(95%CI,51.1%-52.7%)没有成像检查指征。与有指征的患者相比,无成像检查指征的患者在过去一年中急诊就诊、住院、腰痛、下背部成像检查、初级保健医生就诊以及与背部相关的专科就诊的可能性较小。在无指征的患者中,30.1%(95%CI,29.1%-31.1%)接受了成像检查;其中,26.2%接受了高级成像检查(计算机断层扫描或磁共振成像)。接受成像检查的无指征患者比未接受成像检查的患者年龄稍大(55至64岁的患者比例为27.6%[95%CI,25.8%-29.4%],而未接受成像检查的患者比例为20.6%[95%CI,19.6%-21.7%]),且观察/治疗室使用的患病率更高(7.3%[95%CI,6.2%-8.4%]对1.2%[95%CI,0.9%-1.4%])。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,因腰痛到急诊科就诊的患者中,有相当一部分接受了非必要的成像检查,这揭示了降低成本和辐射暴露的机会。

相似文献

1
Imaging during low back pain ED visits: a claims-based descriptive analysis.腰痛急诊就诊期间的影像学检查:基于索赔数据的描述性分析。
Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Mar;33(3):414-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2014.12.060. Epub 2014 Dec 31.
2
Diagnostic testing and treatment of low back pain in United States emergency departments: a national perspective.美国急诊部门腰痛的诊断性检测和治疗:国家视角。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Nov 15;35(24):E1406-11. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181d952a5.
3
Current management practices for patients presenting with low back pain to a large emergency department in Canada.加拿大一家大型急诊科针对腰痛患者的当前管理方法。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Feb 23;18(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1452-1.
4
Emergency department resource use by supervised residents vs attending physicians alone.监管住院医师与单独主治医生相比在急诊科的资源使用情况。
JAMA. 2014 Dec 10;312(22):2394-400. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.16172.
5
Health information exchange reduces repeated diagnostic imaging for back pain.健康信息交换可减少背痛的重复诊断性影像学检查。
Ann Emerg Med. 2013 Jul;62(1):16-24. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2013.01.006. Epub 2013 Mar 7.
6
Imaging utilization from the ED: no difference between observation and admitted patients.急诊科的影像检查使用情况:观察患者和住院患者之间无差异。
Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Aug;33(8):1076-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.04.025. Epub 2015 Apr 22.
7
Effectiveness of Interventions to Decrease Image Ordering for Low Back Pain Presentations in the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review.干预措施降低急诊科下腰痛就诊患者影像学检查的效果:系统评价。
Acad Emerg Med. 2018 Jun;25(6):614-626. doi: 10.1111/acem.13376. Epub 2018 Feb 19.
8
Low back pain in the emergency department-are the ACR Appropriateness Criteria being followed?急诊科的腰痛——是否遵循了美国放射学会适宜性标准?
J Am Coll Radiol. 2015 Apr;12(4):364-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2014.10.020. Epub 2014 Oct 31.
9
Low back pain in older adults: are we utilizing healthcare resources wisely?老年人的腰痛:我们是否在明智地利用医疗资源?
Pain Med. 2006 Mar-Apr;7(2):143-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2006.00112.x.
10
Importance of the type of provider seen to begin health care for a new episode low back pain: associations with future utilization and costs.为新发下腰痛开始进行医疗保健时所看医疗服务提供者类型的重要性:与未来医疗利用和费用的关联
J Eval Clin Pract. 2016 Apr;22(2):247-52. doi: 10.1111/jep.12464. Epub 2015 Sep 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Usual Care for Low Back Pain at United States Emergency Departments, 2016-2022.2016 - 2022年美国急诊科对腰痛的常规护理
Ann Emerg Med. 2025 Jul 11. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2025.06.005.
2
Insights into orthopedic and trauma emergency care and current challenges in Germany.德国骨科与创伤急救护理洞察及当前挑战
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2025 Apr 22;51(1):180. doi: 10.1007/s00068-025-02829-3.
3
Global prevalence of hospital admissions for low back pain: a systematic review with meta-analysis.全球因腰痛住院治疗的患病率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2023 Apr 21;13(4):e069517. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069517.
4
Guideline-concordant utilization of magnetic resonance imaging in adults receiving chiropractic manipulative therapy vs other care for radicular low back pain: a retrospective cohort study.在接受脊椎按摩疗法与其他治疗神经根性下腰痛的成年人中,符合指南的磁共振成像利用:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Jun 8;23(1):554. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05462-y.
5
A prospective study of patients with low back pain attending a Canadian emergency department: Why they came and what happened?一项针对在加拿大急诊科就诊的腰痛患者的前瞻性研究:他们为何而来,发生了什么?
PLoS One. 2022 May 10;17(5):e0268123. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268123. eCollection 2022.
6
Characterizing and quantifying low-value diagnostic imaging internationally: a scoping review.国际上低价值诊断成像的特征描述和量化:范围综述。
BMC Med Imaging. 2022 Apr 21;22(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12880-022-00798-2.
7
Trends and risk factors for opioid administration for non-emergent lower back pain.非紧急性下背部疼痛使用阿片类药物的趋势及风险因素
World J Orthop. 2021 Sep 18;12(9):700-709. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v12.i9.700.
8
Are Emergency Medicine Provider Characteristics Associated With Diagnostic Imaging for Low Back Pain?急诊医学提供者的特征与腰痛的诊断性影像学检查有关吗?
Cureus. 2021 Mar 1;13(3):e13628. doi: 10.7759/cureus.13628.
9
The role of radiography in the study of spinal disorders.放射照相术在脊柱疾病研究中的作用。
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2020 Dec;10(12):2322-2355. doi: 10.21037/qims-20-1014.
10
Are general practitioners referring patients with low back pain for CTs appropriately according to the guidelines: a retrospective review of 3609 medical records in Newfoundland using routinely collected data.根据指南,全科医生是否适当地将腰痛患者转诊进行 CT 检查:使用常规收集的数据对纽芬兰的 3609 份病历进行的回顾性研究。
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Nov 18;21(1):236. doi: 10.1186/s12875-020-01308-5.