Suppr超能文献

A型血友病初治患者中FVIII暴露的类型和强度对抑制剂产生的影响。一项患者水平的荟萃分析。

Type and intensity of FVIII exposure on inhibitor development in PUPs with haemophilia A. A patient-level meta-analysis.

作者信息

Marcucci Maura, Mancuso Maria Elisa, Santagostino Elena, Kenet Gili, Elalfy Mohssen, Holzhauer Susanne, Bidlingmaier Christoph, Escuriola Ettingshausen Carmen, Iorio Alfonso, Nowak-Göttl Ulrike

机构信息

Maura Marcucci, Via Pace 9, 20122 Milan, Italy, Tel.: +39 328 0344384, Fax: +39 02 50320746, E-mail:

出版信息

Thromb Haemost. 2015 May;113(5):958-67. doi: 10.1160/TH14-07-0621. Epub 2015 Jan 29.

Abstract

The impact of treatment-related factors on inhibitor development in previously untreated patients (PUPs) with haemophilia A is still debated. We present the results of a collaborative, individual patient data meta-analytic project. Eligible data sources were published cohorts of PUPs for which patient-level data were available. The exposures of interest were factor (F)VIII type (recombinant [rFVIII] vs plasma-derived [pdFVIII]) and treatment intensity (≥ vs < 150 IU/kg/week) at first treatment. Family history of inhibitors, F8 mutations, age, treatment regimen (on-demand vs prophylaxis), secular trend and surgery were analysed as putative confounders using different statistical approaches (multivariable Cox regression, propensity score analyses, CART). Analyses accounted for the multi-centre origin of the data. We included 761 consecutive, unselected PUPs with moderate to severe haemophilia A from 10 centres in Egypt, Germany, Israel and Italy. A total of 27 % of patients developed inhibitors; 40 % and 22 % of patients treated with rFVIII and pdFVIII (unadjusted HR 2.2, 95 % CI 1.6-2.9), respectively; 51 % and 24 % of patients receiving high- and low-intensity treatment (unadjusted HR 2.9, 95 % CI 2.0-4.2), respectively. In adjusted analyses, only treatment intensity remained an independent predictor; the effect of FVIII type was largely due to confounding, but with a significant interaction between FVIII type and treatment intensity. This patient-level meta-analysis confirms, across different statistical approaches, that high-intensity treatment is a strong risk factor for inhibitor development. The possible role of FVIII type in subgroups is suggested by the test for interactions but could not be proven because of the limited subgroups sample sizes.

摘要

治疗相关因素对既往未治疗的甲型血友病患者(PUPs)体内抑制物产生的影响仍存在争议。我们展示了一项合作的个体患者数据荟萃分析项目的结果。符合条件的数据源是已发表的PUPs队列,且有患者水平的数据。感兴趣的暴露因素是首次治疗时的凝血因子(F)VIII类型(重组[rFVIII]与血浆源性[pdFVIII])和治疗强度(≥与<150 IU/kg/周)。使用不同的统计方法(多变量Cox回归、倾向评分分析、CART)将抑制物家族史、F8突变、年龄、治疗方案(按需治疗与预防治疗)、长期趋势和手术作为假定的混杂因素进行分析。分析考虑了数据的多中心来源。我们纳入了来自埃及、德国、以色列和意大利10个中心的761例连续、未经过筛选的中重度甲型血友病PUPs。共有27%的患者产生了抑制物;接受rFVIII和pdFVIII治疗的患者分别为40%和22%(未调整的风险比[HR]为2.2,95%置信区间[CI]为1.6 - 2.9);接受高强度和低强度治疗的患者分别为51%和24%(未调整的HR为2.9,95%CI为2.0 - 4.2)。在调整分析中,只有治疗强度仍然是一个独立的预测因素;FVIII类型的影响很大程度上是由于混杂因素,但FVIII类型与治疗强度之间存在显著的相互作用。这项患者水平的荟萃分析通过不同的统计方法证实,高强度治疗是抑制物产生的一个强烈危险因素。交互作用检验提示了FVIII类型在亚组中的可能作用,但由于亚组样本量有限,无法得到证实。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验