Herman B Wells Center for Pediatric Research, Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States.
Department of Pediatrics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States.
Front Immunol. 2020 Jun 24;11:1293. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01293. eCollection 2020.
Hemophilia A is an inherited coagulation disorder resulting in the loss of functional clotting factor VIII (FVIII). Presently, the most effective treatment is prophylactic protein replacement therapy. However, this requires frequent life-long intravenous infusions of plasma derived or recombinant clotting factors and is not a cure. A major complication is the development of inhibitory antibodies that nullify the replacement factor. Immune tolerance induction (ITI) therapy to reverse inhibitors can last from months to years, requires daily or every other day infusions of supraphysiological levels of FVIII and is effective in only up to 70% of hemophilia A patients. Preclinical and recent clinical studies have shown that gene replacement therapy with AAV vectors can effectively cure hemophilia A patients. However, it is unclear how hemophilia patients with high risk inhibitor mutations or with established inhibitors will respond to gene therapy, as these patients have been excluded from ongoing clinical trials. AAV8- gene transfer in naïve BALB/c- mice (BALB/c-HA) results in anti-FVIII IgG1 inhibitors following gene transfer, which can be prevented by transient immune modulation with anti-mCD20 (18B12) and oral rapamycin. We investigated if we could improve ITI in inhibitor positive mice by combining anti-mCD20 and rapamycin with AAV8- gene therapy. Our hypothesis was that continuous expression of FVIII protein from gene transfer compared to transient FVIII from weekly protein therapy, would enhance regulatory T cell induction and promote deletion of FVIII reactive B cells, following reconstitution. Mice that received anti-CD20 had a sharp decline in inhibitors, which corresponded to FVIII memory B (B) cell deletion. Importantly, only mice receiving both anti-mCD20 and rapamycin failed to increase inhibitors following rechallenge with intravenous FVIII protein therapy. Our data show that B and T cell immune modulation complements AAV8- gene therapy in naïve and inhibitor positive hemophilia A mice and suggest that such protocols should be considered for AAV gene therapy in high risk or inhibitor positive hemophilia patients.
血友病 A 是一种遗传性凝血障碍疾病,导致功能性凝血因子 VIII(FVIII)丧失。目前,最有效的治疗方法是预防性蛋白替代疗法。然而,这需要频繁的终身静脉输注血浆衍生或重组凝血因子,且无法根治。一个主要的并发症是产生中和替代因子的抑制性抗体。逆转抑制剂的免疫耐受诱导(ITI)治疗可能需要数月至数年,需要每天或每隔一天输注超生理水平的 FVIII,并且仅对多达 70%的血友病 A 患者有效。临床前和最近的临床研究表明,用 AAV 载体进行基因替代疗法可以有效地治愈血友病 A 患者。然而,对于具有高风险抑制剂突变或已建立抑制剂的血友病患者对基因治疗的反应如何尚不清楚,因为这些患者已被排除在正在进行的临床试验之外。在未经处理的 BALB/c- 小鼠(BALB/c-HA)中进行 AAV8-基因转移后,会在基因转移后产生抗 FVIII IgG1 抑制剂,而通过短暂的免疫调节用抗 mCD20(18B12)和口服雷帕霉素可以预防这种情况。我们研究了是否可以通过将抗 mCD20 和雷帕霉素与 AAV8-基因治疗相结合来改善抑制剂阳性小鼠的 ITI。我们的假设是,与每周进行蛋白治疗相比,基因转移持续表达 FVIII 蛋白会增强调节性 T 细胞的诱导,并促进重组后 FVIII 反应性 B 细胞的删除。接受抗 CD20 治疗的小鼠抑制剂急剧下降,这与 FVIII 记忆 B(B)细胞的删除相对应。重要的是,只有接受抗 mCD20 和雷帕霉素治疗的小鼠在再次接受静脉内 FVIII 蛋白治疗后未能增加抑制剂。我们的数据表明,B 和 T 细胞免疫调节补充了 AAV8-基因治疗在未经处理和抑制剂阳性的血友病 A 小鼠中的作用,并表明在高危或抑制剂阳性的血友病患者中应考虑使用此类方案进行 AAV 基因治疗。