• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

存在缺失观测值时两个相关比例之差的置信区间构建

Confidence interval construction for the difference between two correlated proportions with missing observations.

作者信息

Tang Nian-Sheng, Li Hui-Qiong, Tang Man-Lai, Li Jie

机构信息

a Department of Statistics , Yunnan University , Kunming , P. R. China.

b Department of Mathematics and Statistics , Hang Seng Management College , Shatin , N.T. , Hong Kong.

出版信息

J Biopharm Stat. 2016;26(2):323-38. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2014.1000544. Epub 2015 Jan 29.

DOI:10.1080/10543406.2014.1000544
PMID:25632882
Abstract

Under the assumption of missing at random, eight confidence intervals (CIs) for the difference between two correlated proportions in the presence of incomplete paired binary data are constructed on the basis of the likelihood ratio statistic, the score statistic, the Wald-type statistic, the hybrid method incorporated with the Wilson score and Agresti-Coull (AC) intervals, and the Bootstrap-resampling method. Extensive simulation studies are conducted to evaluate the performance of the presented CIs in terms of coverage probability and expected interval width. Our empirical results evidence that the Wilson-score-based hybrid CI and the Wald-type CI together with the constrained maximum likelihood estimates perform well for small-to-moderate sample sizes in the sense that (i) their empirical coverage probabilities are quite close to the prespecified confidence level, (ii) their expected interval widths are shorter, and (iii) their ratios of the mesial non-coverage to non-coverage probabilities lie in interval [0.4, 0.6]. An example from a neurological study is used to illustrate the proposed methodologies.

摘要

在随机缺失的假设下,基于似然比统计量、得分统计量、 Wald 型统计量、结合 Wilson 得分和 Agresti - Coull(AC)区间的混合方法以及 Bootstrap 重采样方法,构建了存在不完全配对二元数据时两个相关比例差异的八个置信区间(CI)。进行了广泛的模拟研究,以评估所提出的置信区间在覆盖概率和预期区间宽度方面的性能。我们的实证结果表明,基于 Wilson 得分的混合置信区间和 Wald 型置信区间以及约束最大似然估计在中小样本量情况下表现良好,具体表现为:(i)它们的实证覆盖概率非常接近预先设定的置信水平;(ii)它们的预期区间宽度较短;(iii)它们的内侧未覆盖与未覆盖概率之比在区间[0.4, 0.6]内。通过一项神经学研究的实例来说明所提出的方法。

相似文献

1
Confidence interval construction for the difference between two correlated proportions with missing observations.存在缺失观测值时两个相关比例之差的置信区间构建
J Biopharm Stat. 2016;26(2):323-38. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2014.1000544. Epub 2015 Jan 29.
2
Confidence intervals construction for difference of two means with incomplete correlated data.具有不完全相关数据的两个均值之差的置信区间构建。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016 Mar 11;16:31. doi: 10.1186/s12874-016-0125-3.
3
Confidence intervals of the difference between areas under two ROC curves in matched-pair experiments.配对实验中两条ROC曲线下面积差异的置信区间。
Stat Med. 2020 Sep 10;39(20):2621-2638. doi: 10.1002/sim.8562. Epub 2020 May 10.
4
Asymptotic confidence interval construction for proportion difference in medical studies with bilateral data.双侧数据医学研究中比例差的渐近置信区间构建。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2011 Jun;20(3):233-59. doi: 10.1177/0962280209358135. Epub 2010 Feb 24.
5
Simultaneous confidence intervals of risk differences in stratified paired designs.分层配对设计中风险差异的同时置信区间。
J Biopharm Stat. 2013 Mar 11;23(2):361-77. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2011.616964.
6
Confidence-interval construction for rate ratio in matched-pair studies with incomplete data.不完全数据配对研究中率比的置信区间构建。
J Biopharm Stat. 2014;24(3):546-68. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2014.888438.
7
Construction of confidence intervals for the risk differences in stratified design with correlated bilateral data.具有相关双侧数据的分层设计中风险差异置信区间的构建。
J Biopharm Stat. 2019;29(3):446-467. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2019.1579222. Epub 2019 Apr 1.
8
Exact and approximate unconditional confidence intervals for proportion difference in the presence of incomplete data.存在不完全数据时比例差异的精确和近似无条件置信区间。
Stat Med. 2009 Feb 15;28(4):625-41. doi: 10.1002/sim.3490.
9
Confidence intervals for proportion ratios of stratified correlated bilateral data.分层相关双边数据比例比的置信区间。
J Biopharm Stat. 2019;29(1):203-225. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2018.1489405. Epub 2018 Jul 16.
10
Confidence intervals for the difference of marginal probabilities in clustered matched-pair binary data.聚类匹配对二元数据中边际概率差异的置信区间。
Pharm Stat. 2012 Sep-Oct;11(5):386-93. doi: 10.1002/pst.1523. Epub 2012 Jun 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing non-inferiority for binary matched-pairs data with missing values: a powerful and flexible GEE approach based on the risk difference.评估存在缺失值的二元配对数据的非劣效性:一种基于风险差异的强大且灵活的广义估计方程方法。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2025 Feb 27;25(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s12874-025-02497-2.
2
Large-scale analysis of interobserver agreement and reliability in cardiotocography interpretation during labor using an online tool.利用在线工具对产时胎心监护解读的观察者间一致性和可靠性进行大规模分析。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Feb 14;24(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06322-4.
3
Clinical response and pharmacokinetics of bendamustine as a component of salvage R-B(O)AD therapy for the treatment of primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL).
在挽救性 R-B(O)AD 治疗中作为组成部分的苯达莫司汀治疗原发性中枢神经系统淋巴瘤(PCNSL)的临床反应和药代动力学。
BMC Cancer. 2018 Jul 9;18(1):729. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4632-y.
4
Inference and sample size calculation for clinical trials with incomplete observations of paired binary outcomes.针对配对二元结局存在不完全观测值的临床试验的推断与样本量计算。
Stat Med. 2017 Feb 20;36(4):581-591. doi: 10.1002/sim.7168. Epub 2016 Nov 10.