• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

具有不完全相关数据的两个均值之差的置信区间构建。

Confidence intervals construction for difference of two means with incomplete correlated data.

作者信息

Li Hui-Qiong, Tang Nian-Sheng, Yi Jie-Yi

机构信息

Department of Statistics, Yunnan University, No.2 Cuihu North Road, Kunming, 650091, China.

School of Statistics, Beijing Normal University, No. 19 XinJieKouWai St., HaiDian District, Beijing, China.

出版信息

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016 Mar 11;16:31. doi: 10.1186/s12874-016-0125-3.

DOI:10.1186/s12874-016-0125-3
PMID:26969507
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4788928/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Incomplete data often arise in various clinical trials such as crossover trials, equivalence trials, and pre and post-test comparative studies. Various methods have been developed to construct confidence interval (CI) of risk difference or risk ratio for incomplete paired binary data. But, there is little works done on incomplete continuous correlated data. To this end, this manuscript aims to develop several approaches to construct CI of the difference of two means for incomplete continuous correlated data.

METHODS

Large sample method, hybrid method, simple Bootstrap-resampling method based on the maximum likelihood estimates (B 1) and Ekbohm's unbiased estimator (B 2), and percentile Bootstrap-resampling method based on the maximum likelihood estimates (B 3) and Ekbohm's unbiased estimator (B 4) are presented to construct CI of the difference of two means for incomplete continuous correlated data. Simulation studies are conducted to evaluate the performance of the proposed CIs in terms of empirical coverage probability, expected interval width, and mesial and distal non-coverage probabilities.

RESULTS

Empirical results show that the Bootstrap-resampling-based CIs B 1, B 2, B 4 behave satisfactorily for small to moderate sample sizes in the sense that their coverage probabilities could be well controlled around the pre-specified nominal confidence level and the ratio of their mesial non-coverage probabilities to the non-coverage probabilities could be well controlled in the interval [0.4, 0.6].

CONCLUSIONS

If one would like a CI with the shortest interval width, the Bootstrap-resampling-based CIs B 1 is the optimal choice.

摘要

背景

在各种临床试验中,如交叉试验、等效性试验以及前后测试比较研究中,常常会出现数据不完整的情况。针对不完整配对二元数据,已经开发出了多种方法来构建风险差异或风险比的置信区间(CI)。但是,对于不完整的连续相关数据,相关研究较少。为此,本手稿旨在开发几种方法来构建不完整连续相关数据的两个均值之差的置信区间。

方法

提出了大样本法、混合法、基于最大似然估计的简单Bootstrap重采样法(B1)和埃克博姆无偏估计法(B2),以及基于最大似然估计的百分位数Bootstrap重采样法(B3)和埃克博姆无偏估计法(B4),用于构建不完整连续相关数据的两个均值之差的置信区间。进行了模拟研究,以评估所提出的置信区间在经验覆盖概率、预期区间宽度以及近端和远端未覆盖概率方面的性能。

结果

实证结果表明,基于Bootstrap重采样的置信区间B1、B2、B4在小到中等样本量的情况下表现令人满意,因为它们的覆盖概率可以在预先指定的名义置信水平附近得到很好的控制,并且它们的近端未覆盖概率与未覆盖概率的比率可以在区间[0.4, 0.6]内得到很好的控制。

结论

如果希望得到区间宽度最短的置信区间,基于Bootstrap重采样的置信区间B1是最佳选择。

相似文献

1
Confidence intervals construction for difference of two means with incomplete correlated data.具有不完全相关数据的两个均值之差的置信区间构建。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016 Mar 11;16:31. doi: 10.1186/s12874-016-0125-3.
2
Confidence interval construction for the difference between two correlated proportions with missing observations.存在缺失观测值时两个相关比例之差的置信区间构建
J Biopharm Stat. 2016;26(2):323-38. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2014.1000544. Epub 2015 Jan 29.
3
Asymptotic confidence interval construction for proportion difference in medical studies with bilateral data.双侧数据医学研究中比例差的渐近置信区间构建。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2011 Jun;20(3):233-59. doi: 10.1177/0962280209358135. Epub 2010 Feb 24.
4
Simultaneous confidence intervals of risk differences in stratified paired designs.分层配对设计中风险差异的同时置信区间。
J Biopharm Stat. 2013 Mar 11;23(2):361-77. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2011.616964.
5
Confidence-interval construction for rate ratio in matched-pair studies with incomplete data.不完全数据配对研究中率比的置信区间构建。
J Biopharm Stat. 2014;24(3):546-68. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2014.888438.
6
Construction of confidence intervals for the risk differences in stratified design with correlated bilateral data.具有相关双侧数据的分层设计中风险差异置信区间的构建。
J Biopharm Stat. 2019;29(3):446-467. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2019.1579222. Epub 2019 Apr 1.
7
Confidence intervals of the difference between areas under two ROC curves in matched-pair experiments.配对实验中两条ROC曲线下面积差异的置信区间。
Stat Med. 2020 Sep 10;39(20):2621-2638. doi: 10.1002/sim.8562. Epub 2020 May 10.
8
Exact and approximate unconditional confidence intervals for proportion difference in the presence of incomplete data.存在不完全数据时比例差异的精确和近似无条件置信区间。
Stat Med. 2009 Feb 15;28(4):625-41. doi: 10.1002/sim.3490.
9
A comparison of methods for the construction of confidence interval for relative risk in stratified matched-pair designs.分层配对设计中相对危险度置信区间构建方法的比较。
Stat Med. 2010 Jan 15;29(1):46-62. doi: 10.1002/sim.3744.
10
A comparison of confidence interval methods for the intraclass correlation coefficient in community-based cluster randomization trials with a binary outcome.基于社区的整群随机对照试验中二元结局的组内相关系数置信区间方法比较。
Clin Trials. 2016 Apr;13(2):180-7. doi: 10.1177/1740774515606377. Epub 2015 Sep 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Confidence-interval construction for rate ratio in matched-pair studies with incomplete data.不完全数据配对研究中率比的置信区间构建。
J Biopharm Stat. 2014;24(3):546-68. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2014.888438.
2
Corrected profile likelihood confidence interval for binomial paired incomplete data.二项配对不完全数据的校正轮廓似然置信区间。
Pharm Stat. 2013 Jan-Feb;12(1):48-58. doi: 10.1002/pst.1551. Epub 2013 Jan 7.
3
Confidence interval construction for proportion ratio in paired studies based on hybrid method.基于混合方法的配对研究中比例比的置信区间构建。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2012 Aug;21(4):361-78. doi: 10.1177/0962280210384714. Epub 2010 Sep 27.
4
The generalisation of student's problems when several different population variances are involved.当涉及几个不同总体方差时学生问题的推广。
Biometrika. 1947;34(1-2):28-35. doi: 10.1093/biomet/34.1-2.28.
5
Using Bayesian p-values in a 2 × 2 table of matched pairs with incompletely classified data.在具有不完全分类数据的配对2×2表中使用贝叶斯p值。
J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat. 2009 May 1;58(2):237-246. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9876.2008.00645.x.
6
Exact and approximate unconditional confidence intervals for proportion difference in the presence of incomplete data.存在不完全数据时比例差异的精确和近似无条件置信区间。
Stat Med. 2009 Feb 15;28(4):625-41. doi: 10.1002/sim.3490.
7
Construction of confidence limits about effect measures: a general approach.效应量置信区间的构建:一种通用方法。
Stat Med. 2008 May 10;27(10):1693-702. doi: 10.1002/sim.3095.
8
Small-sample adjustments in using the sandwich variance estimator in generalized estimating equations.在广义估计方程中使用三明治方差估计量时的小样本调整。
Stat Med. 2002 May 30;21(10):1429-41. doi: 10.1002/sim.1142.
9
Interval estimation for the difference between independent proportions: comparison of eleven methods.独立比例差异的区间估计:十一种方法的比较
Stat Med. 1998 Apr 30;17(8):873-90. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19980430)17:8<873::aid-sim779>3.0.co;2-i.
10
A hybrid paired and unpaired analysis for the comparison of proportions.一种用于比例比较的混合配对与非配对分析。
Stat Med. 1995 Jul 15;14(13):1463-70. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780141306.