• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一个支持智障人士独立使用脸书的界面。

An interface to support independent use of Facebook by people with intellectual disability.

作者信息

Davies Daniel K, Stock Steven E, King Larry R, Brown R Brian, Wehmeyer Michael L, Shogren Karrie A

机构信息

AbleLink Technologies, 618 N. Nevada Ave., Colorado Springs, CO 80903, USA.

出版信息

Intellect Dev Disabil. 2015 Feb;53(1):30-41. doi: 10.1352/1934-9556-53.1.30.

DOI:10.1352/1934-9556-53.1.30
PMID:25633380
Abstract

Use of social networking sites, such as Facebook, is rapidly expanding, but people with intellectual disability are at risk for exclusion because sites like Facebook are not designed for cognitive access. The purpose of the present study was to describe the development and initial testing of a cognitively accessible prototype interface for Facebook, called Endeavor Connect, that was designed to support independent Facebook use by people with intellectual disability. The performance of young adults with intellectual disability when completing five common Facebook tasks was compared when using the Endeavor Connect and Facebook interfaces. Results suggest that, when using Endeavor Connect, young adults with intellectual disability completed more tasks independently with fewer errors and required fewer prompts. Implications for research and practice are discussed.

摘要

诸如脸书这样的社交网站的使用正在迅速扩展,但智障人士面临被排斥的风险,因为像脸书这样的网站并非为认知访问而设计。本研究的目的是描述一种名为“奋进连接”的脸书认知可访问原型界面的开发和初步测试,该界面旨在支持智障人士独立使用脸书。在使用“奋进连接”和脸书界面时,对智障青年完成五项常见脸书任务时的表现进行了比较。结果表明,在使用“奋进连接”时,智障青年能够独立完成更多任务,错误更少,所需提示也更少。文中还讨论了对研究和实践的启示。

相似文献

1
An interface to support independent use of Facebook by people with intellectual disability.一个支持智障人士独立使用脸书的界面。
Intellect Dev Disabil. 2015 Feb;53(1):30-41. doi: 10.1352/1934-9556-53.1.30.
2
Leveraging Social Capital of Persons With Intellectual Disabilities Through Facebook Participation: The Perspectives of Family Members and Direct Support Staff.通过参与脸书利用智障人士的社会资本:家庭成员和直接支持人员的观点
Intellect Dev Disabil. 2017 Dec;55(6):407-418. doi: 10.1352/1934-9556-55.6.407.
3
Leveraging Social Capital of Individuals with Intellectual Disabilities through Participation on Facebook.通过在 Facebook 上的参与,利用智障人士的社会资本。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2018 Jan;31(1):e79-e91. doi: 10.1111/jar.12321. Epub 2016 Dec 21.
4
Evaluation of an application for making palmtop computers accessible to individuals with intellectual disabilities.对一款使智障人士能够使用掌上电脑的应用程序的评估。
J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2006 Mar;31(1):39-46. doi: 10.1080/13668250500488645.
5
Evaluation of cognitively accessible software to increase independent access to cellphone technology for people with intellectual disability.评估认知易用型软件,以增加智障人士独立使用手机技术的机会。
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2008 Dec;52(12):1155-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2008.01099.x. Epub 2008 Jul 17.
6
Familiarity and prevalence of Facebook use for social networking among individuals with traumatic brain injury.创伤性脑损伤患者使用Facebook进行社交网络的熟悉程度和流行情况。
Brain Inj. 2011;25(12):1155-62. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2011.613086. Epub 2011 Sep 30.
7
Using virtual reality to provide health care information to people with intellectual disabilities: acceptability, usability, and potential utility.使用虚拟现实技术向智障人士提供医疗保健信息:可接受性、可用性和潜在效用。
J Med Internet Res. 2011 Nov 14;13(4):e91. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1917.
8
Internet Use by People with Intellectual Disability: Exploring Digital Inequality-A Systematic Review.智力残疾人士的互联网使用:探索数字不平等——系统评价。
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2021 Aug;24(8):503-520. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2020.0499. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
9
Relationship between Facebook use and problematic Internet use among college students.大学生 Facebook 使用与网络问题使用之间的关系。
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2012 Jun;15(6):324-7. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2010.0410.
10
Identifying the key concerns of Irish persons with intellectual disability.识别爱尔兰智障人士的主要担忧。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2014 Nov;27(6):564-75. doi: 10.1111/jar.12099. Epub 2014 May 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Toward Inclusive Approaches in the Design, Development, and Implementation of eHealth in the Intellectual Disability Sector: Scoping Review.在智力残疾领域中设计、开发和实施电子健康的包容性方法:范围综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 May 30;25:e45819. doi: 10.2196/45819.
2
Interventions for social and community participation for adults with intellectual disability, psychosocial disability or on the autism spectrum: An umbrella systematic review.针对智力残疾、心理社会残疾或自闭症谱系障碍成年人的社会和社区参与干预措施:一项综合性系统评价。
Front Rehabil Sci. 2022 Aug 19;3:935473. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2022.935473. eCollection 2022.