School of Health and Behavioural Sciences, University of the Sunshine Coast, Maroochydore, Australia.
College of Education, Psychology, and Social Work, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2021 Aug;24(8):503-520. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2020.0499. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
Many people with intellectual disability experience digital inequality due to a lack of Internet access; this is known as the . Digital inequality is also apparent when people with intellectual disability have Internet access, but only use it for a small number of applications (e.g., watching videos and playing games). Recently, it has been suggested that digital inequality also occurs in situations where some Internet users are less likely than others to translate their online activities to offline resources, including educational outcomes and social capital. The extent to which people with intellectual disability are translating their online activities to offline resources has not been examined. We conducted a systematic and critical review using PRISMA guidelines. The search strategy terms "intellectual disability" and "Internet use" were used to search the databases: Scopus; Wiley Online Library; Psychiatry Online; Web of Science; CINAHL; and PubMed. Twenty-four studies were found, which described 53 types of Internet use, 48 risks of Internet use, and 28 benefits of Internet use. The data were identified thematically and categorized to facilitate comparisons. The most frequently reported types of Internet use were in the category of (23%), the most common Internet risks were in the category of (24%), and the most often reported benefits were in the category of (33%). The findings indicate that the benefits of Internet use for people with intellectual disability have received much less attention than the risks.
许多智障人士由于缺乏上网条件而面临数字鸿沟；当智障人士能够上网，但仅使用互联网的少数应用程序（如观看视频和玩游戏）时，也会出现数字鸿沟。最近有人认为，在一些互联网用户不太可能将其在线活动转化为离线资源的情况下，也存在数字不平等现象，包括教育成果和社会资本。尚未研究智障人士将其在线活动转化为离线资源的程度。我们使用 PRISMA 指南进行了系统和批判性评价。搜索策略术语为“智障”和“互联网使用”，用于搜索数据库：Scopus；Wiley Online Library；Psychiatry Online；Web of Science；CINAHL；和 PubMed。发现了 24 项研究，描述了 53 种互联网使用类型、48 种互联网使用风险和 28 种互联网使用益处。通过主题识别数据并进行分类，以方便比较。最常报告的互联网使用类型属于（23%），最常见的互联网风险属于（24%），最常报告的益处属于（33%）。研究结果表明，与风险相比，互联网使用对智障人士的益处受到的关注要少得多。
