Paleg Ginny, Livingstone Roslyn
Montgomery County Infants and Toddlers Program, Rockville, Maryland, USA
Sunny Hill Health Centre for Children, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Clin Rehabil. 2015 Nov;29(11):1077-91. doi: 10.1177/0269215514565947. Epub 2015 Jan 30.
To summarize and critically appraise evidence regarding use of gait trainers (walkers providing trunk and pelvic support) at home or school with children who are unable to walk independently or with hand-held walkers.
Searches were performed in seven electronic databases including EBM Reviews, CINAHL, Medline and EMBASE for publications in English from database inception to November 2014.
Included studies involved at least one child with a mobility limitation and measured an outcome related to gait trainer use. Articles were appraised using American Academy of Cerebral Palsy and Developmental Medicine criteria for group and single-subject designs and quality ratings completed for studies rated levels I-III. The PRISMA statement was followed with inclusion criteria set a priori. Two reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts and full-text articles.
Seventeen studies involving 182 children were included. Evidence from one small randomized controlled trial suggests a non-significant trend toward increased walking distance while the other evidence level II study (concurrent multiple baseline design) reports increased number of steps. Two level III studies (non-randomized two-group studies) report statistically significant impact on mobility level with one finding significant impact on bowel function and an association between increased intervention time and bone mineral density. Remaining descriptive level evidence provides support for positive impact on a range of activity outcomes, with some studies reporting impact on affect, motivation and participation with others.
Evidence supporting outcomes for children using gait trainers is primarily descriptive and, while mainly positive, is insufficient to draw firm conclusions.
总结并严格评估关于无法独立行走或使用手持助行器的儿童在家中或学校使用步态训练器(提供躯干和骨盆支撑的助行器)的证据。
在七个电子数据库中进行检索,包括循证医学评价、护理学与健康领域数据库、医学索引数据库和荷兰医学文摘数据库,检索从数据库建立至2014年11月的英文出版物。
纳入的研究涉及至少一名有行动障碍的儿童,并测量了与步态训练器使用相关的结果。使用美国脑性瘫痪和发育医学学会的标准对分组设计和单受试者设计的文章进行评估,并对评级为I - III级的研究完成质量评级。遵循系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目声明,预先设定纳入标准。两名评审员独立筛选标题、摘要和全文文章。
纳入了17项涉及182名儿童的研究。一项小型随机对照试验的证据表明步行距离增加的趋势不显著,而另一项证据等级为II级的研究(同期多重基线设计)报告步数增加。两项III级研究(非随机两组研究)报告对行动能力水平有统计学显著影响,一项发现对肠道功能有显著影响,以及干预时间增加与骨密度之间存在关联。其余描述性水平的证据支持对一系列活动结果有积极影响,一些研究报告对情感、动机和参与有影响,其他研究也有相关报告。
支持儿童使用步态训练器结果的证据主要是描述性的,虽然主要是积极的,但不足以得出确凿结论。