Sorensen Christopher J, Norton Barbara J, Callaghan Jack P, Hwang Ching-Ting, Van Dillen Linda R
Program in Physical Therapy, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, 4444 Forest Park Blvd., Campus Box 8502, Saint Louis, MO 63108, USA.
Department of Kinesiology, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada N2L3G1.
Man Ther. 2015 Aug;20(4):553-7. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2015.01.001. Epub 2015 Jan 14.
An induced-pain paradigm has been used in back-healthy people to understand risk factors for developing low back pain during prolonged standing.
The purposes of this study were to (1) compare baseline lumbar lordosis in back-healthy participants who do (Pain Developers) and do not (Non-Pain Developers) develop low back pain during 2 h of standing, and (2) examine the relationship between lumbar lordosis and low back pain intensity.
Cross-sectional.
First, participants stood while positions of markers placed superficial to the lumbar vertebrae were recorded using a motion capture system. Following collection of marker positions, participants stood for 2 h while performing light work tasks. At baseline and every 15 min during standing, participants rated their low back pain intensity on a visual analog scale. Lumbar lordosis was calculated using marker positions collected prior to the 2 h standing period. Lumbar lordosis was compared between pain developers and non-pain developers. In pain developers, the relationship between lumbar lordosis and maximum pain was examined.
RESULTS/FINDINGS: There were 24 (42%) pain developers and 33 (58%) non-pain developers. Lumbar lordosis was significantly larger in pain developers compared to non-pain developers (Mean difference = 4.4°; 95% Confidence Interval = 0.9° to 7.8°, Cohen's d = 0.7). The correlation coefficient between lumbar lordosis and maximum pain was 0.46 (P = 0.02).
The results suggest that standing in more lumbar lordosis may be a risk factor for low back pain development during prolonged periods of standing. Identifying risk factors for low back pain development can inform preventative and early intervention strategies.
诱导性疼痛范式已被用于健康人群,以了解长时间站立时发生下腰痛的风险因素。
本研究的目的是:(1)比较在2小时站立过程中会(疼痛发生者)和不会(非疼痛发生者)发生下腰痛的健康参与者的基线腰椎前凸;(2)研究腰椎前凸与下腰痛强度之间的关系。
横断面研究。
首先,参与者站立时,使用动作捕捉系统记录置于腰椎表面的标记物的位置。收集标记物位置后,参与者站立2小时,同时执行轻度工作任务。在基线和站立过程中的每15分钟,参与者使用视觉模拟量表对其下腰痛强度进行评分。使用在2小时站立期之前收集的标记物位置计算腰椎前凸。比较疼痛发生者和非疼痛发生者之间的腰椎前凸。在疼痛发生者中,研究腰椎前凸与最大疼痛之间的关系。
结果/发现:有24名(42%)疼痛发生者和33名(58%)非疼痛发生者。与非疼痛发生者相比,疼痛发生者的腰椎前凸明显更大(平均差异=4.4°;95%置信区间=0.9°至7.8°,科恩d值=0.7)。腰椎前凸与最大疼痛之间的相关系数为0.46(P=0.02)。
结果表明,在长时间站立期间,保持更大的腰椎前凸可能是发生下腰痛的一个风险因素。识别下腰痛发生的风险因素可为预防和早期干预策略提供依据。