Wiers Corinde E, Ludwig Vera U, Gladwin Thomas E, Park Soyoung Q, Heinz Andreas, Wiers Reinout W, Rinck Mike, Lindenmeyer Johannes, Walter Henrik, Bermpohl Felix
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany.
Berlin School of Mind and Brain, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Germany.
Addict Biol. 2015 Sep;20(5):990-9. doi: 10.1111/adb.12221. Epub 2015 Jan 13.
Alcohol-dependent patients have been shown to faster approach than avoid alcohol stimuli on the Approach Avoidance Task (AAT). This so-called alcohol approach bias has been associated with increased brain activation in the medial prefrontal cortex and nucleus accumbens. Cognitive bias modification (CBM) has been used to retrain the approach bias with the clinically relevant effect of decreasing relapse rates one year later. The effects of CBM on neural signatures of approach/avoidance tendencies remain hitherto unknown. In a double-blind placebo-controlled design, 26 alcohol-dependent in-patients were assigned to a CBM or a placebo training group. Both groups performed the AAT for three weeks: in CBM training, patients pushed away 90 percent of alcohol cues; this rate was 50 percent in placebo training. Before and after training, patients performed the AAT offline, and in a 3 T magnetic resonance imaging scanner. The relevant neuroimaging contrast for the alcohol approach bias was the difference between approaching versus avoiding alcohol cues relative to soft drink cues: [(alcohol pull > alcohol push) > (soft drink pull > soft drink push)]. Before training, both groups showed significant alcohol approach bias-related activation in the medial prefrontal cortex. After training, patients in the CBM group showed stronger reductions in medial prefrontal cortex activation compared with the placebo group. Moreover, these reductions correlated with reductions in approach bias scores in the CBM group only. This suggests that CBM affects neural mechanisms involved in the automatic alcohol approach bias, which may be important for the clinical effectiveness of CBM.
在趋近-回避任务(AAT)中,酒精依赖患者对酒精刺激的趋近速度比回避速度更快。这种所谓的酒精趋近偏向与内侧前额叶皮质和伏隔核中大脑激活增加有关。认知偏向矫正(CBM)已被用于重新训练这种趋近偏向,其临床相关效果是使一年后的复发率降低。迄今为止,CBM对趋近/回避倾向的神经特征的影响尚不清楚。在一项双盲安慰剂对照设计中,26名酒精依赖住院患者被分配到CBM训练组或安慰剂训练组。两组都进行了为期三周的AAT:在CBM训练中,患者推开90%的酒精线索;在安慰剂训练中,这一比例为50%。训练前后,患者离线进行AAT,并在3T磁共振成像扫描仪中进行。酒精趋近偏向的相关神经影像对比是相对于软饮料线索,趋近与回避酒精线索之间的差异:[(酒精拉动>酒精推开)>(软饮料拉动>软饮料推开)]。训练前,两组在内侧前额叶皮质均显示出与酒精趋近偏向相关的显著激活。训练后,CBM组患者内侧前额叶皮质激活的减少程度比安慰剂组更强。此外,这些减少仅与CBM组中趋近偏向分数的减少相关。这表明CBM会影响与自动酒精趋近偏向相关的神经机制,这可能对CBM的临床效果很重要。