Tran H, Turingan I, Tran K, Zajkowska M, Lam V, Hawthorne W
Discipline of Surgery, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney at Westmead Hospital, Hawkesbury Road, Westmead, NSW, Australia,
Hernia. 2014 Oct;18(5):731-44. doi: 10.1007/s10029-014-1261-5. Epub 2014 May 14.
Multiple prospective studies have confirmed safety and efficacy of laparoscopic inguinal herniorraphy with single-port compared to multiport surgery. This prospective randomized controlled trial aimed to assess safety, efficacy and potential benefits of single-port total extraperitoneal inguinal herniorraphy beyond the learning curve.
All referred patients with inguinal/femoral hernias were enrolled from December 2011 to February 2013. Exclusion criteria included workers compensation cases. Identical balloon dissector, light-weight mesh and non-absorbable tacks were used in all cases. For single-port cases Triport™ was used while structural balloon trocar/inflation bulb for multiport cases. Results were analyzed with IBM(®) SPSS(®) version 22 for Windows.
Participation rate was 100 % with 157 inguinal/femoral hernias in 100 patients: 51 randomized to single-port and 49 to multiport group. There was no conversion to open surgery/need for additional ports. There were no statistical differences between single-port and multiport groups with respect to age, sex, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists scores, preoperative pain, hernia defect sizes and length of hospital stay. Operation times were equivalent for single-port and multiport 60.0 vs 61.0 min, P = 0.23, respectively. Significantly, single-port patients ingested fewer pain killers: 6 tablets vs 14 Dextropropoxyphene tablets, P < 0.001, experienced less pain (visual analog scores) on day 1 and 7 post-op op: 2.5 and 0, P < 0.001 compared to 4.5 and 2.5, P < 0.001, respectively, returned to work/normal physical activities 7 days quicker: 7.0 vs 14.0, P < 0.001 and had higher cosmetic scar scores at 6-week follow-up: 24 vs 21, P < 0.001, compared to multiport patients. There were no mortalities, morbidities or recurrences after follow-up of 6-21 months.
Compared to multiport, single-port laparoscopic total extraperitoneal inguinal herniorraphy, when performed by a high-volume and highly dedicated hernia surgeon, resulted in significantly reduced postoperative pain, analgesic requirements, quicker return to work/normal activities, improved cosmesis, and equivalent safety and efficacy.
多项前瞻性研究已证实,与多端口手术相比,单端口腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术具有安全性和有效性。这项前瞻性随机对照试验旨在评估单端口完全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术在学习曲线之外的安全性、有效性和潜在益处。
2011年12月至2013年2月纳入所有转诊的腹股沟/股疝患者。排除标准包括工伤赔偿病例。所有病例均使用相同的球囊分离器、轻质补片和不可吸收钉。单端口病例使用Triport™,多端口病例使用结构性球囊套管针/充气灯泡。结果使用IBM(®) SPSS(®) 22版Windows软件进行分析。
参与率为100%,100例患者中有157例腹股沟/股疝:51例随机分为单端口组,49例分为多端口组。无中转开放手术/无需额外端口的情况。单端口组和多端口组在年龄、性别、体重指数、美国麻醉医师协会评分、术前疼痛、疝缺损大小和住院时间方面无统计学差异。单端口组和多端口组的手术时间相当,分别为60.0分钟和61.0分钟,P = 0.23。值得注意的是,单端口组患者服用的止痛片较少:6片对14片右丙氧芬片,P < 0.001;术后第1天和第7天疼痛较轻(视觉模拟评分):分别为2.5和0,P < 0.001,而多端口组分别为4.5和2.5,P < 0.001;恢复工作/正常体力活动快7天:7.0对14.0,P < 0.001;6周随访时美容瘢痕评分更高:24对21,P < 0.001。随访6 - 21个月后无死亡、并发症或复发。
与多端口相比,由经验丰富且专注的疝外科医生进行的单端口腹腔镜完全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术可显著减轻术后疼痛、减少镇痛需求、更快恢复工作/正常活动、改善美容效果,且安全性和有效性相当。