Cantor Scott B, Deshmukh Ashish A, Luca Nancy Stancic, Nogueras-González Graciela M, Rajan Tanya, Prokhorov Alexander V
Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Addict Behav. 2015 Jun;45:79-86. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2015.01.004. Epub 2015 Jan 14.
Although smoking-cessation interventions typically focus directly on patients, this paper conducts an economic evaluation of a novel smoking-cessation intervention focused on training physicians and/or pharmacists to use counseling techniques that would decrease smoking rates at a reasonable cost.
To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of interventions that train physicians and/or pharmacists to counsel their patients on smoking-cessation techniques.
Using decision-analytic modeling, we compared four strategies for smoking-cessation counseling education: training only physicians, training only pharmacists, training both physicians and pharmacists (synergy strategy), and training neither physicians nor pharmacists (i.e., no specialized training, which is the usual practice). Short-term outcomes were based on results from a clinical trial conducted in 16 communities across the Houston area; long-term outcomes were calculated from epidemiological data. Short-term outcomes were measured using the cost per quit, and long-term outcomes were measured using the cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). Cost data were taken from institutional sources; both costs and QALYs were discounted at 3%.
Training both physicians and pharmacists added 0.09 QALY for 45-year-old men. However, for 45-year-old women, the discounted quality-adjusted life expectancy only increased by 0.01 QALY when comparing the synergy strategy to no intervention. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of the synergy strategy with respect to the non-intervention strategy was US$868/QALY for 45-year-old men and US$8953/QALY for 45-year-old women. The results were highly sensitive to the quit rates and community size.
Synergistic educational training for physicians and pharmacists could be a cost-effective method for smoking cessation in the community.
尽管戒烟干预措施通常直接针对患者,但本文对一种新型戒烟干预措施进行了经济评估,该干预措施侧重于培训医生和/或药剂师使用能够以合理成本降低吸烟率的咨询技巧。
评估培训医生和/或药剂师为患者提供戒烟技巧咨询的干预措施的成本效益。
我们使用决策分析模型,比较了四种戒烟咨询教育策略:仅培训医生、仅培训药剂师、同时培训医生和药剂师(协同策略)以及既不培训医生也不培训药剂师(即不进行专门培训,这是通常的做法)。短期结果基于在休斯顿地区16个社区进行的一项临床试验的结果;长期结果根据流行病学数据计算得出。短期结果用每成功戒烟一人的成本来衡量,长期结果用每质量调整生命年(QALY)的成本来衡量。成本数据来自机构来源;成本和QALY均按3%进行贴现。
对于45岁男性,同时培训医生和药剂师可增加0.09个QALY。然而,对于45岁女性,将协同策略与不干预进行比较时,贴现后的质量调整预期寿命仅增加了0.01个QALY。协同策略相对于非干预策略的增量成本效益比(ICER),对于45岁男性为868美元/QALY,对于45岁女性为8953美元/QALY。结果对戒烟率和社区规模高度敏感。
对医生和药剂师进行协同教育培训可能是社区戒烟的一种具有成本效益的方法。