Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Department of Health Services Research, The University of Florida Health Science Center, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Tob Control. 2019 Jan;28(1):88-94. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2017-054229. Epub 2018 Jun 9.
The prevalence of cigarette smoking is significantly higher among those living at or below the federal poverty level. Cell phone-based interventions among such populations have the potential to reduce smoking rates and be cost-effective.
We performed a cost-effectiveness analysis of three smoking cessation interventions: Standard Care (SC) (brief advice to quit, nicotine replacement therapy and self-help written materials), Enhanced Care (EC) (SC plus cell phone-delivered messaging) and Intensive Care (IC) (EC plus cell phone-delivered counselling). Quit rates were obtained from Project ACTION (Adult smoking Cessation Treatment through Innovative Outreach to Neighborhoods). We evaluated shorter-term outcomes of cost per quit and long-term outcomes using cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY).
For men, EC cost an additional $541 per quit vs SC; however, IC cost an additional $5232 per quit vs EC. For women, EC was weakly dominated by IC-IC cost an additional $1092 per quit vs SC. Similarly, for men, EC had incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $426 per QALY gained vs SC; however, IC resulted in ICER of $4127 per QALY gained vs EC. For women, EC was weakly dominated; the ICER of IC vs SC was $1251 per QALY gained. The ICER was below maximum acceptable willingness-to-pay threshold of $50 000 per QALY under all alternative modelling assumptions.
Cell phone interventions for low socioeconomic groups are a cost-effective use of healthcare resources. Intensive Care was the most cost-effective strategy both for men and women.
NCT00948129; Results.
生活在联邦贫困线以下的人群中,吸烟的流行率明显更高。针对这些人群的基于手机的干预措施有可能降低吸烟率并具有成本效益。
我们对三种戒烟干预措施进行了成本效益分析:标准护理(SC)(简短戒烟建议、尼古丁替代疗法和自我帮助书面材料)、增强护理(EC)(SC 加通过手机发送的消息)和强化护理(IC)(EC 加通过手机提供的咨询)。戒烟率来自 Project ACTION(通过创新的邻里外展为成年人戒烟提供治疗)。我们评估了成本每戒烟的短期结果和使用质量调整生命年(QALY)计算的长期结果成本每 QALY。
对于男性,EC 比 SC 每戒烟增加 541 美元;然而,IC 比 EC 每戒烟增加 5232 美元。对于女性,EC 被 IC 弱支配-IC 比 SC 每戒烟增加 1092 美元。同样,对于男性,EC 的增量成本效益比(ICER)为每获得一个 QALY 增加 426 美元;然而,IC 导致每获得一个 QALY 增加 4127 美元。对于女性,EC 被弱支配;IC 与 SC 的 ICER 为每获得一个 QALY 增加 1251 美元。在所有替代建模假设下,ICER 均低于 50000 美元/QALY 的最大可接受意愿支付阈值。
针对社会经济地位较低群体的手机干预措施是对医疗保健资源的有效利用。对于男性和女性来说,强化护理都是最具成本效益的策略。
NCT00948129;结果。