Suppr超能文献

多组分分子水平身体成分参考方法:不断发展的概念与未来方向。

Multi-component molecular-level body composition reference methods: evolving concepts and future directions.

作者信息

Heymsfield S B, Ebbeling C B, Zheng J, Pietrobelli A, Strauss B J, Silva A M, Ludwig D S

机构信息

Pennington Biomedical Research Center, LSU System, Baton Rouge, LA, USA.

出版信息

Obes Rev. 2015 Apr;16(4):282-94. doi: 10.1111/obr.12261. Epub 2015 Feb 3.

Abstract

Excess adiposity is the main phenotypic feature that defines human obesity and that plays a pathophysiological role in most chronic diseases. Measuring the amount of fat mass present is thus a central aspect of studying obesity at the individual and population levels. Nevertheless, a consensus is lacking among investigators on a single accepted 'reference' approach for quantifying fat mass in vivo. While the research community generally relies on the multi-component body volume class of 'reference' models for quantifying fat mass, no definable guide discerns among different applied equations for partitioning the four (fat, water, protein and mineral mass) or more quantified components, standardizes 'adjustment' or measurement system approaches for model-required labelled water dilution volumes and bone mineral mass estimates, or firmly establishes the body temperature at which model physical properties are assumed. The resulting differing reference strategies for quantifying body composition in vivo leads to small, but under some circumstances, important differences in the amount of measured body fat. Recent technological advances highlight opportunities to expand model applications to new subject groups and measured components such as total body protein. The current report reviews the historical evolution of multi-component body volume-based methods in the context of prevailing uncertainties and future potential.

摘要

过多的肥胖是定义人类肥胖的主要表型特征,并且在大多数慢性疾病中发挥病理生理作用。因此,测量体内脂肪量是在个体和人群层面研究肥胖的核心内容。然而,研究人员对于一种被广泛接受的用于体内定量脂肪量的“参考”方法尚未达成共识。虽然研究界普遍依赖多成分身体体积类“参考”模型来定量脂肪量,但对于划分四个(脂肪、水、蛋白质和矿物质质量)或更多定量成分的不同应用方程,并没有明确的指南来区分,也没有对模型所需标记水稀释体积和骨矿物质质量估计的“调整”或测量系统方法进行标准化,或者确定假设模型物理特性时的体温。由此产生的用于体内定量身体成分的不同参考策略导致测量的体脂量存在细微但在某些情况下很重要的差异。最近的技术进步凸显了将模型应用扩展到新的受试者群体以及测量成分(如全身蛋白质)的机会。本报告在当前存在的不确定性和未来潜力的背景下,回顾了基于多成分身体体积的方法的历史演变。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

9
Female obesity: clinical and psychological assessment toward the best treatment.女性肥胖:最佳治疗的临床和心理评估。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024 May 3;15:1349794. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1349794. eCollection 2024.
10
Adult obesity diagnostic tool: A narrative review.成人肥胖诊断工具:叙述性综述。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Apr 26;103(17):e37946. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000037946.

本文引用的文献

3
Body composition assessment in the infant.婴儿身体成分评估。
Am J Hum Biol. 2014 May-Jun;26(3):291-304. doi: 10.1002/ajhb.22500. Epub 2014 Jan 15.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验