Zander Thomas, Dreischarf Marcel, Schmidt Hendrik, Bergmann Georg, Rohlmann Antonius
Julius Wolff Institute, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13303 Berlin, Germany.
Julius Wolff Institute, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13303 Berlin, Germany.
J Biomech. 2015 Feb 26;48(4):578-584. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.01.011. Epub 2015 Jan 21.
Knowledge of in vivo spinal loads and muscle forces remains limited but is necessary for spinal biomechanical research. To assess the in vivo spinal loads, measurements with telemeterised vertebral body replacements were performed in four patients. The following postures were investigated: (a) standing with arms hanging down on sides, (b) holding dumbbells to subject the patient to a vertical load, and (c) the forward elevation of arms for creating an additional flexion moment. The same postures were simulated by an inverse static model for validation purposes, to predict muscle forces, and to assess the spinal loads in subjects without implants. Holding dumbbells on sides increased implant forces by the magnitude of the weight of the dumbbells. In contrast, elevating the arms yielded considerable implant forces with a high correlation between the external flexion moment and the implant force. Predictions agreed well with experimental findings, especially for forward elevation of arms. Flexion moments were mainly compensated by erector spinae muscles. The implant altered the kinematics and, thus, the spinal loads. Elevation of both arms in vivo increased spinal axial forces by approximately 100N; each additional kg of dumbbell weight held in the hands increased the spinal axial forces by 60N. Model predictions suggest that in the intact situation, the force increase is one-third greater for these loads. In vivo measurements are essential for the validation of analytical models, and the combination of both methods can reveal unquantifiable data such as the spinal loads in the intact non-instrumented situation.
关于体内脊柱负荷和肌肉力量的知识仍然有限,但对于脊柱生物力学研究来说是必要的。为了评估体内脊柱负荷,对四名患者进行了带遥测功能的椎体置换测量。研究了以下姿势:(a) 双臂垂于身体两侧站立;(b) 手持哑铃使患者承受垂直负荷;(c) 双臂向前抬起以产生额外的屈曲力矩。为了进行验证、预测肌肉力量并评估未植入假体受试者的脊柱负荷,通过逆静态模型模拟了相同的姿势。身体两侧手持哑铃会使植入物受力增加哑铃重量的大小。相比之下,双臂抬起会产生相当大的植入物受力,且外部屈曲力矩与植入物受力之间具有高度相关性。预测结果与实验结果吻合良好,尤其是双臂向前抬起的情况。屈曲力矩主要由竖脊肌代偿。植入物改变了运动学,进而改变了脊柱负荷。体内双臂抬起使脊柱轴向力增加约100N;手中每额外持重1kg会使脊柱轴向力增加60N。模型预测表明,在完整状态下,这些负荷导致的力增加幅度要大出三分之一。体内测量对于分析模型的验证至关重要,两种方法相结合可以揭示诸如完整未植入假体状态下的脊柱负荷等无法量化的数据。