Dreischarf Marcel, Albiol Laia, Zander Thomas, Arshad Rizwan, Graichen Friedmar, Bergmann Georg, Schmidt Hendrik, Rohlmann Antonius
Julius Wolff Institute, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
Julius Wolff Institute, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
J Biomech. 2015 Feb 26;48(4):560-565. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.01.007. Epub 2015 Jan 19.
Knowledge about in vivo spinal loads is required for the identification of risk factors for low back pain and for realistic preclinical testing of spinal implants. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to measure the in vivo forces on a vertebral body replacement (VBR) during trunk flexion and to analyze in detail the typical relationship between trunk inclination and spinal load. Telemeterized VBRs were implanted in five patients. In vivo loads were measured 135 times during flexion while standing or sitting. The trunk inclination was simultaneously recorded. To reveal elementary differences between flexion while standing and sitting, the force increases at the maximal inclination, as compared to the upright position, were also determined. Approximately 90% of all standing trials showed a characteristic inclination-load relationship, with an initial increase of the resultant force followed by a plateau or even a decrease of the force at an inclination of approximately 33°. Further flexion to the average maximal inclination angle of 53° only marginally affected the implant loads (450N). Maximal forces were measured during the return to the initial standing position (565N). Flexion during standing led to a greater force increase (330N) than during sitting (200N) when compared to the respective upright positions. The force plateau at greater inclination angles might be explained by abdominal load support, complex stabilization of active and passive spinal structures or intricate load sharing within the implant complex. The data presented here aid in understanding the loads acting on an instrumented lumbar spine.
了解体内脊柱负荷对于确定腰痛的风险因素以及对脊柱植入物进行实际的临床前测试至关重要。因此,本研究的目的是测量椎体置换物(VBR)在躯干屈曲过程中的体内受力情况,并详细分析躯干倾斜度与脊柱负荷之间的典型关系。将遥测式VBR植入五名患者体内。在站立或坐着时屈曲过程中测量了135次体内负荷。同时记录躯干倾斜度。为了揭示站立时屈曲和坐着时屈曲之间的基本差异,还确定了与直立位置相比,在最大倾斜度时力的增加情况。大约90%的站立试验显示出典型的倾斜度-负荷关系,合力最初增加,随后在大约33°倾斜度时达到平稳甚至力下降。进一步屈曲至平均最大倾斜角度53°时,对植入物负荷的影响很小(约450N)。在恢复到初始站立位置时测量到最大力(约565N)。与各自的直立位置相比,站立时屈曲导致的力增加(约330N)比坐着时屈曲(约200N)更大。较大倾斜角度时的力平稳可能是由于腹部负荷支撑、主动和被动脊柱结构的复杂稳定作用或植入物复合体内部复杂的负荷分担。此处呈现的数据有助于理解作用于植入仪器的腰椎的负荷情况。