• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Icare眼压回弹式眼压计在先天性白内障患儿术后的应用

[Application of Icare rebound tonometer in children after congenital cataract surgery].

作者信息

Li Yunping, Jia Songbai, Liu Ping, Xiao Manyi, Wei Xin, Tang Luosheng, Xia Kun

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410011; Research Center of Eye Disease, Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410011; Postdoctoral Research Station of State Key Laboratory of Medical Genetics, Central South University, Changsha 410078, China.

出版信息

Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2015 Jan;40(1):72-7. doi: 10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2015.01.012.

DOI:10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2015.01.012
PMID:25652385
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the difference in intraocular pressure (IOP) readings as well as the tolerability between Icare rebound tonometer (Icare RBT) and Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT), and to evaluate the application of Icare RBT in monitoring the intraocular pressure in children after congenital cataract surgery.

METHODS

The IOP was measured with the Icare RBT and GAT respectively in 150 children (262 eyes) after congenital cataract surgery by two experienced ophthalmologists. Correlation and Bland-Altman analysis were used to assess the agreement in IOP readings between the two instruments. The influence of the central corneal thickness (CCT) adjusted for age on IOP readings was analyzed by linear regression analysis. The tolerance of the patients to Icare RBT and GAT measurement were surveyed.

RESULTS

The mean age was (44.82 ± 11.56) months in 150 children, including 81 boys and 69 girls. The mean IOP readings by the Icare RBT and GAT were (16.08 ± 5.72) mmHg and (14.17 ± 5.05) mmHg, respectively. The mean difference between the Icare RBT and GAT was (1.91 ± 2.04) mmHg, which was significantly correlated with CCT (r=0.409, P<0.001). The IOP readings by Icare RBT was significantly correlated with that measured by GAT(r= 0.936, P<0.001). The 95% confidence interval of the difference between the two instruments was ?2.10 to 5.91 mmHg. The Icare RBT examination was well tolerated by the children compared to the GAT examination.

CONCLUSION

The Icare RBT is easy to use and well tolerated by the children after congenital cataract surgery. Compared to GAT, the value measured by the IOPs trends to be overestimated. The difference in readings between the 2 tonometers will magnify with the increase in CCT.

摘要

目的

比较Icare眼压回弹式眼压计(Icare RBT)与Goldmann压平眼压计(GAT)测量眼压(IOP)的差异及耐受性,评估Icare RBT在先天性白内障手术后儿童眼压监测中的应用。

方法

由两位经验丰富的眼科医生分别使用Icare RBT和GAT对150例先天性白内障手术后的儿童(262只眼)进行眼压测量。采用相关性分析和Bland-Altman分析评估两种仪器眼压测量结果的一致性。通过线性回归分析年龄校正后的中央角膜厚度(CCT)对眼压测量值的影响。调查患者对Icare RBT和GAT测量的耐受性。

结果

150例儿童的平均年龄为(44.82±11.56)个月,其中男孩81例,女孩69例。Icare RBT和GAT测量的平均眼压分别为(16.08±5.72)mmHg和(14.17±5.05)mmHg。Icare RBT与GAT的平均差值为(1.91±2.04)mmHg,与CCT显著相关(r=0.409,P<0.001)。Icare RBT测量的眼压与GAT测量的眼压显著相关(r=0.936,P<0.001)。两种仪器测量差值的95%置信区间为-2.10至5.91 mmHg。与GAT检查相比,儿童对Icare RBT检查的耐受性良好。

结论

Icare RBT使用方便,先天性白内障手术后儿童耐受性良好。与GAT相比,Icare RBT测量的眼压值有高估趋势。两种眼压计测量值的差异随CCT增加而增大。

相似文献

1
[Application of Icare rebound tonometer in children after congenital cataract surgery].Icare眼压回弹式眼压计在先天性白内障患儿术后的应用
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2015 Jan;40(1):72-7. doi: 10.11817/j.issn.1672-7347.2015.01.012.
2
Comparison of the rebound tonometer with the Goldmann applanation tonometer in glaucoma patients.青光眼患者中回弹眼压计与Goldmann压平眼压计的比较。
Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2007 May-Jun;35(4):335-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-9071.2007.01451.x.
3
The utility of rebound tonometer in late elderly subjects.回弹式眼压计在老年晚期受试者中的应用
Clin Interv Aging. 2014 Jan 22;9:227-32. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S57644. eCollection 2014.
4
Comparability of three intraocular pressure measurement: iCare pro rebound, non-contact and Goldmann applanation tonometry in different IOP group.三种眼压测量方法的比较:iCare pro 回弹眼压计、非接触眼压计和 Goldmann 压平眼压计在不同眼压组中的比较。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2019 Nov 14;19(1):225. doi: 10.1186/s12886-019-1236-5.
5
Comparison of intraocular pressure measurements and assessment of intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility with the portable ICare rebound tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer in glaucoma patients.比较便携式 ICare 回弹眼压计和 Goldmann 压平眼压计在青光眼患者中的眼压测量值以及评估观察者内和观察者间的可重复性。
J Glaucoma. 2013 Apr-May;22(4):325-9. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e318237caa2.
6
Comprasion of ICare rebound tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer in high myopia.Icare回弹式眼压计与Goldmann压平式眼压计在高度近视中的比较。
ScientificWorldJournal. 2014;2014:869460. doi: 10.1155/2014/869460. Epub 2014 Oct 14.
7
Effect of corneal thickness on dynamic contour, rebound, and goldmann tonometry.角膜厚度对动态轮廓眼压计、回弹眼压计和戈德曼眼压计测量结果的影响。
Ophthalmology. 2006 Dec;113(12):2156-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.06.016. Epub 2006 Sep 25.
8
Agreement of Intraocular Pressure Measurement of Icare ic200 with Goldmann Applanation Tonometer in Adult Eyes with Normal Cornea.成人正常角膜眼的 Icare ic200 眼压测量与 Goldmann 压平眼压计的一致性。
Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2021 Jan-Feb;4(1):89-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ogla.2020.08.004. Epub 2020 Aug 13.
9
Agreement of Intraocular Pressure Measurement of Icare ic200 with Goldmann Applanation Tonometer in Adult Eyes with Normal Cornea.成人正常角膜眼的 Icare ic200 眼压测量与 Goldmann 压平眼压计的一致性。
Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2021 May-Jun;4(3):238-243. doi: 10.1016/j.ogla.2021.04.002.
10
Comparison of ICare, dynamic contour tonometer, and ocular response analyzer with Goldmann applanation tonometer in patients with glaucoma.青光眼患者中Icare眼压计、动态轮廓眼压计和眼反应分析仪与Goldmann压平眼压计的比较。
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2009 Sep-Oct;19(5):783-9. doi: 10.1177/112067210901900516.

引用本文的文献

1
Pediatric Glaucoma: A Literature's Review and Analysis of Surgical Results.小儿青光眼:文献综述与手术结果分析
Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:393670. doi: 10.1155/2015/393670. Epub 2015 Sep 16.