• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

青光眼患者中Icare眼压计、动态轮廓眼压计和眼反应分析仪与Goldmann压平眼压计的比较。

Comparison of ICare, dynamic contour tonometer, and ocular response analyzer with Goldmann applanation tonometer in patients with glaucoma.

作者信息

Vandewalle Evelien, Vandenbroeck Sofie, Stalmans Ingeborg, Zeyen Thierry

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospitals Leuven, Campus St Raphaël, Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

Eur J Ophthalmol. 2009 Sep-Oct;19(5):783-9. doi: 10.1177/112067210901900516.

DOI:10.1177/112067210901900516
PMID:19787598
Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the intraocular pressure (IOP) readings taken by ICare, Pascal dynamic contour tonometer (DCT), and ocular response analyzer (ORA) with those taken by Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT). We sought to evaluate the influence of central corneal thickness (CCT) on IOP measurements and to compare patients' preferences for the four tonometers.

METHODS

In this prospective study, 93 eyes from 93 patients were examined. Patients were randomly divided into 4 groups to vary the order in which the tonometers were applied. CCT was measured with an ultrasound pachymeter.

RESULTS

The average CCT was 558+/-47.4 microm. The mean +/- standard deviation IOP for GAT, ICare, DCT, and ORA (Goldmann-correlated IOP) (ORA(GC)) were 15.1+/-4.8, 15.7+/-5.7, 18.2+/-5.1, and 18.3+/-6.6 mmHg, respectively. There was no significant difference between the mean IOP obtained with GAT and ICare (p=0.14). There was also no difference in IOP levels between the mean IOP obtained with DCT and ORA (p=0.26). There was no correlation between IOP measurements and CCT for the 4 instruments. Bland-Altman graphs showed disagreement between the measurements taken by GAT and the other instruments. There was no significant difference in patients' preference among the 4 instruments (p=0.48).

CONCLUSIONS

IOP readings from ICare were consistent with those from GAT, whereas DCT readings correspond well to ORA(GC) measurements. DCT and ORA readings both overestimated the GAT readings. There was no correlation between the IOP measurements and the CCT for the 4 instruments. There was no significant difference in patients' preference among the 4 instruments.

摘要

目的

比较ICare眼压计、帕斯卡动态轮廓眼压计(DCT)和眼反应分析仪(ORA)所测眼压读数与戈德曼压平眼压计(GAT)所测眼压读数。我们试图评估中央角膜厚度(CCT)对眼压测量的影响,并比较患者对这四种眼压计的偏好。

方法

在这项前瞻性研究中,对93例患者的93只眼睛进行了检查。患者被随机分为4组,以改变眼压计的使用顺序。使用超声角膜测厚仪测量CCT。

结果

平均CCT为558±47.4微米。GAT、ICare、DCT和ORA(戈德曼相关眼压)(ORA(GC))的平均±标准差眼压分别为15.1±4.8、15.7±5.7、18.2±5.1和18.3±6.6 mmHg。GAT和ICare所测平均眼压之间无显著差异(p = 0.14)。DCT和ORA所测平均眼压水平之间也无差异(p = 0.26)。这4种仪器的眼压测量值与CCT之间均无相关性。Bland-Altman图显示GAT与其他仪器所测值之间存在差异。4种仪器在患者偏好方面无显著差异(p = 0.48)。

结论

ICare所测眼压读数与GAT一致,而DCT读数与ORA(GC)测量值相符。DCT和ORA读数均高估了GAT读数。4种仪器的眼压测量值与CCT之间均无相关性。4种仪器在患者偏好方面无显著差异。

相似文献

1
Comparison of ICare, dynamic contour tonometer, and ocular response analyzer with Goldmann applanation tonometer in patients with glaucoma.青光眼患者中Icare眼压计、动态轮廓眼压计和眼反应分析仪与Goldmann压平眼压计的比较。
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2009 Sep-Oct;19(5):783-9. doi: 10.1177/112067210901900516.
2
Intraocular pressure measurement precision with the Goldmann applanation, dynamic contour, and ocular response analyzer tonometers.眼压计测量 Goldmann 压平眼压、动态轮廓眼压和眼反应分析仪眼压的精度。
Ophthalmology. 2010 Apr;117(4):730-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.09.020. Epub 2010 Feb 1.
3
Comparisons between Pascal dynamic contour tonometry, the TonoPen, and Goldmann applanation tonometry in patients with glaucoma.青光眼患者中帕斯卡动态轮廓眼压计、托诺笔眼压计和戈德曼压平眼压计的比较。
Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2007 May;85(3):272-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0420.2006.00834.x.
4
Comparison of ICare tonometer with Goldmann applanation tonometer in glaucoma patients.在青光眼患者中比较Icare眼压计与Goldmann压平眼压计。
J Glaucoma. 2006 Jun;15(3):213-7. doi: 10.1097/01.ijg.0000212208.87523.66.
5
Effect of corneal thickness on dynamic contour, rebound, and goldmann tonometry.角膜厚度对动态轮廓眼压计、回弹眼压计和戈德曼眼压计测量结果的影响。
Ophthalmology. 2006 Dec;113(12):2156-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.06.016. Epub 2006 Sep 25.
6
The effect of thin, thick, and normal corneas on Goldmann intraocular pressure measurements and correction formulae in individual eyes.薄角膜、厚角膜和正常角膜对各眼 Goldmann 眼压测量值和校正公式的影响。
Ophthalmology. 2012 Mar;119(3):443-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.07.058. Epub 2011 Oct 27.
7
Comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in healthy and glaucomatous eyes.Goldmann 压平眼压测量法与动态轮廓眼压测量法在正常眼和青光眼眼中的比较。
Eye (Lond). 2009 Feb;23(2):262-9. doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6703102. Epub 2008 Jan 25.
8
The Influence of Corneal Biomechanical Properties on Intraocular Pressure Measurements Using a Rebound Self-tonometer.角膜生物力学特性对回弹眼压计眼压测量的影响。
J Glaucoma. 2018 Jun;27(6):511-518. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000948.
9
Effect of central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis on tonometry as measured by dynamic contour tonometry, ocular response analyzer, and Goldmann tonometry in glaucomatous eyes.中央角膜厚度和角膜滞后对青光眼患者使用动态轮廓眼压计、眼反应分析仪和Goldmann眼压计测量眼压的影响。
J Glaucoma. 2008 Aug;17(5):361-5. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e31815c3ad3.
10
Comparison of ocular response analyzer, dynamic contour tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer.眼反应分析仪、动态轮廓眼压计与Goldmann压平眼压计的比较。
Int Ophthalmol. 2010 Dec;30(6):651-9. doi: 10.1007/s10792-010-9377-9. Epub 2010 May 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Performance of home-based self-tonometry (iCare HOME (TA022)) for measuring intraocular pressure among healthy and glaucoma patients.家庭自眼压测量(iCare HOME(TA022))在健康人群和青光眼患者眼压测量中的性能。
F1000Res. 2023 Sep 22;12:128. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.123104.2. eCollection 2023.
2
Telehealth and Screening Strategies in the Diagnosis and Management of Glaucoma.青光眼诊断与管理中的远程医疗及筛查策略
J Clin Med. 2021 Aug 4;10(16):3452. doi: 10.3390/jcm10163452.
3
Changes in corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure following Femto-LASIK using Goldman applanation tonometry and ocular response analyzer.
使用Goldman压平眼压计和眼反应分析仪评估飞秒激光原位角膜磨镶术后角膜生物力学和眼压的变化。
Int J Ophthalmol. 2020 May 18;13(5):782-787. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2020.05.13. eCollection 2020.
4
Effect of Near Work on Intraocular Pressure in Emmetropes.正视眼近距工作对眼压的影响。
J Ophthalmol. 2020 Jan 28;2020:1352434. doi: 10.1155/2020/1352434. eCollection 2020.
5
Comparison of Icare Pro Tonometry and Icare One Tonometry Measurements in Healthy Eyes.健康眼睛中Icare Pro眼压计与Icare One眼压计测量结果的比较。
Turk J Ophthalmol. 2019 Jun 27;49(3):130-133. doi: 10.4274/tjo.galenos.2018.06787.
6
Comparison of different intraocular pressure measurement techniques in normal eyes and post small incision lenticule extraction.正常眼和小切口透镜切除术术后不同眼压测量技术的比较
Clin Ophthalmol. 2017 Jul 14;11:1309-1314. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S132578. eCollection 2017.
7
Comparison of ICare and IOPen Goldmann applanation tonometry according to international standards 8612 in glaucoma patients.根据国际标准8612对青光眼患者进行的Icare眼压计与Goldmann压平眼压计的比较。
Int J Ophthalmol. 2016 Nov 18;9(11):1624-1628. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2016.11.14. eCollection 2016.
8
Ageing and ocular surface immunity.衰老与眼表免疫。
Br J Ophthalmol. 2017 Jan;101(1):1-5. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-307848. Epub 2016 Jul 4.
9
Intraocular Pressure Changes during Accommodation in Progressing Myopes, Stable Myopes and Emmetropes.进展性近视、稳定近视和正视眼在调节过程中的眼压变化
PLoS One. 2015 Oct 30;10(10):e0141839. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0141839. eCollection 2015.
10
IOP agreement between I-Care TA01 rebound tonometer and the Goldmann applanation tonometer in eyes with and without glaucoma.I-Care TA01回弹式眼压计与戈德曼压平眼压计在青光眼和非青光眼眼中的眼压一致性协议
Int Ophthalmol. 2015 Feb;35(1):89-93. doi: 10.1007/s10792-014-0026-6. Epub 2014 Dec 16.