Botanic Garden Meise , Bouchout Domain, Meise , Belgium.
PeerJ. 2015 Jan 8;3:e723. doi: 10.7717/peerj.723. eCollection 2015.
This study demonstrates the value of legacy literature and historic collections as a source of data on environmental history. Chenopodium vulvaria L. has declined in northern Europe and is of conservation concern in several countries, whereas in other countries outside Europe it has naturalised and is considered an alien weed. In its European range it is considered native in the south, but the northern boundary of its native range is unknown. It is hypothesised that much of its former distribution in northern Europe was the result of repeated introductions from southern Europe and that its decline in northern Europe is the result of habitat change and a reduction in the number of propagules imported to the north. A historical analysis of its ecology and distribution was conducted by mining legacy literature and historical botanical collections. Text analysis of habitat descriptions written on specimens and published in botanical literature covering a period of more than 200 years indicate that the habitat and introduction pathways of C. vulvaria have changed with time. Using the non-European naturalised range in a climate niche model, it is possible to project the range in Europe. By comparing this predicted model with a similar model created from all observations, it is clear that there is a large discrepancy between the realized and predicted distributions. This is discussed together with the social, technological and economic changes that have occurred in northern Europe, with respect to their influence on C. vulvaria.
本研究展示了旧文献和历史收藏作为环境历史数据来源的价值。Chenopodium vulvaria L. 在北欧的数量减少,在多个国家受到保护关注,而在欧洲以外的其他国家已自然归化,被视为外来杂草。在其欧洲分布范围内,它在南部被认为是本地的,但它的本地分布的北部边界是未知的。据推测,它在北欧的大部分先前分布是由于从南欧的多次引入造成的,而它在北欧的减少是由于栖息地变化以及传入北方的繁殖体数量减少所致。通过挖掘旧文献和历史植物收藏,对其生态学和分布进行了历史分析。对标本上的栖息地描述的文本分析以及在涵盖 200 多年的植物学文献中发表的描述表明,C. vulvaria 的栖息地和引入途径随着时间的推移而发生了变化。使用非欧洲归化范围在气候生态位模型中,可以预测 C. vulvaria 在欧洲的范围。通过将此预测模型与从所有观察结果创建的类似模型进行比较,可以清楚地看出实际分布与预测分布之间存在很大差异。这与北欧发生的社会、技术和经济变化一起进行了讨论,以及它们对 C. vulvaria 的影响。