Fang Yanhong, Zhang Jijia, Yin Guanhai, Hu Senqi, Zhang Entao
Department of Psychology, Jinggangshan University, Jiangxi, China.
Scand J Psychol. 2015 Jun;56(3):245-53. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12197. Epub 2015 Feb 5.
The response exclusion hypothesis suggests that the polarity of semantic effects in the picture-word interference paradigm is determined by the response-relevant criteria. Semantic interference effects would be observed when semantically related distractor words satisfy the response-relevant criteria; otherwise, semantic facilitation effects should be found. The purpose of this study was to further evaluate the response exclusion hypothesis by exploring the typicality effects in pictures naming. In two experiments, pictures of objects were named either in the context of verb distractor words with different typicality of passive functions or in the context of adjective distractor words with different typicality of characteristics. Facilitation effects were observed in context of typical verbs and adjectives, while interference effects were observed in the context of atypical verbs and adjectives. Given that neither typical nor atypical distractor words satisfy the response-relevant criteria to produce noun, these findings are problematic for the response exclusion hypothesis. Role of syntagmatic relationships in lexical retrieval was invoked to explain present findings.
反应排除假说认为,图片-单词干扰范式中语义效应的极性由与反应相关的标准决定。当语义相关的干扰词满足与反应相关的标准时,会观察到语义干扰效应;否则,应会发现语义促进效应。本研究的目的是通过探索图片命名中的典型性效应来进一步评估反应排除假说。在两个实验中,物体图片要么在具有不同被动功能典型性的动词干扰词的情境下被命名,要么在具有不同特征典型性的形容词干扰词的情境下被命名。在典型动词和形容词的情境下观察到促进效应,而在非典型动词和形容词的情境下观察到干扰效应。鉴于典型和非典型干扰词都不满足产生名词的与反应相关的标准,这些发现对反应排除假说来说是有问题的。我们援引组合关系在词汇检索中的作用来解释当前的发现。