• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用 K-CS 测试评估视障人士的对比敏感度。一种新颖的基于智能手机的对比敏感度测试——设计与验证。

Evaluation of contrast sensitivity in visually impaired individuals using K-CS test. A novel smartphone-based contrast sensitivity test-Design and validation.

机构信息

Laboratory of Experimental Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2024 Feb 8;19(2):e0288512. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288512. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0288512
PMID:38330096
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10852338/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

To describe the development and investigate the accuracy of a novel smartphone-based Contrast Sensitivity (CS) application, the K-CS test.

METHODS

A total of 67 visually impaired and 50 normal participants were examined monocularly using the novel digital K-CS test and the Pelli-Robson (PR) chart. The K-CS test examines letter contrast sensitivity in logarithmic units, using eight levels of contrast from logCS = ~0,1 to logCS = ~2,1 at two spatial frequencies of 1.5 and 3 cycles per degree (cpd). The K-CS test was compared to the gold standard, PR test and intra-session test repeatability was also examined.

RESULTS

The K-CS test in normally sighted was found to agree well with the PR, providing comparable mean scores in logCS (±SD) (K-CS = 1.908 ± 0.06 versus PR = 1.93 ± 0.05) at 1.5 cpd and mean (± SD) logCS at 3 cpd (K-CS = 1.83 ± 0.13 versus PR = 1.86 ± 0.07). The mean best corrected visual acuity of visually impaired participants was 0.67 LogMAR (SD = 0.21) and the K-CS was also found to agree well with the Pelli-Robson in this group, with an equivalent mean (±SD) logCS at 1.5 cpd: (K-CS = 1.19 ± 0.27, PR = 1.15 ± 0.31), 3 cpd: K-CS = 1.01 ± 0.33, PR = 0.94 ± 0.34. Regarding the intra-session test repeatability, both the K-CS test and the PR test showed good repeatability in terms of the 95% limits of agreement (LoA): K-CS = ±0.112 at 1.5 cpd and ±0.133 at 3 cpd, PR = ±0.143 at 1.5 cpd and ±0.183 in 3 cpd in visually impaired individuals.

CONCLUSION

The K-CS test provides a quick assessment of the CS both in normally sighted and visually impaired individuals. The K-CS could serve as an alternative tool to assess contrast sensitivity function using a smartphone and provides results that agree well with the commonly used PR test.

摘要

背景

描述一种新型基于智能手机的对比敏感度(CS)应用程序,即 K-CS 测试的开发并探究其准确性。

方法

共有 67 名视力障碍者和 50 名正常参与者分别使用新型数字 K-CS 测试和 Pelli-Robson(PR)图表进行单眼检查。K-CS 测试以对数单位检查字母对比敏感度,使用从 logCS=0.1 到 logCS=2.1 的八个对比度水平,在两个空间频率 1.5 和 3 个周期/度(cpd)下进行。将 K-CS 测试与金标准 PR 测试进行比较,并检查了同一批次内的测试可重复性。

结果

在正常视力者中,K-CS 测试与 PR 测试结果吻合良好,在 1.5 cpd 时,K-CS 测试的平均(±SD)logCS 得分(K-CS=1.908±0.06 与 PR=1.93±0.05)和 3 cpd 时的平均(±SD)logCS 得分(K-CS=1.83±0.13 与 PR=1.86±0.07)具有可比性。视力障碍者的最佳矫正视力平均值为 0.67 LogMAR(SD=0.21),且 K-CS 测试与该组中的 Pelli-Robson 测试结果也吻合良好,在 1.5 cpd 时具有相同的平均(±SD)logCS 值:(K-CS=1.19±0.27,PR=1.15±0.31),在 3 cpd 时:K-CS=1.01±0.33,PR=0.94±0.34。关于同一批次内的测试可重复性,K-CS 测试和 PR 测试在 95%一致性界限(LoA)方面都显示出良好的可重复性:在 1.5 cpd 时 K-CS=±0.112,在 3 cpd 时 K-CS=±0.133,在视力障碍者中,PR=±0.143 在 1.5 cpd 和±0.183 在 3 cpd。

结论

K-CS 测试可快速评估正常视力者和视力障碍者的 CS。K-CS 可以作为使用智能手机评估对比敏感度功能的替代工具,并提供与常用的 PR 测试结果吻合良好的结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a5f/10852338/c8296da318d8/pone.0288512.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a5f/10852338/d30c52e31983/pone.0288512.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a5f/10852338/e257f29624d1/pone.0288512.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a5f/10852338/c8296da318d8/pone.0288512.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a5f/10852338/d30c52e31983/pone.0288512.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a5f/10852338/e257f29624d1/pone.0288512.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3a5f/10852338/c8296da318d8/pone.0288512.g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of contrast sensitivity in visually impaired individuals using K-CS test. A novel smartphone-based contrast sensitivity test-Design and validation.使用 K-CS 测试评估视障人士的对比敏感度。一种新颖的基于智能手机的对比敏感度测试——设计与验证。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 8;19(2):e0288512. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288512. eCollection 2024.
2
Comparing the CamBlobs2 contrast sensitivity test to the near Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity test in normally-sighted young adults.比较 CamBlobs2 对比敏感度测试与正常视力年轻成年人的近 Pelli-Robson 对比敏感度测试。
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2021 Sep;41(5):1125-1133. doi: 10.1111/opo.12862. Epub 2021 Aug 21.
3
Validation of an iPad test of letter contrast sensitivity.iPad字母对比度敏感度测试的验证
Optom Vis Sci. 2014 Mar;91(3):291-6. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000158.
4
Evaluation of the SpotChecks contrast sensitivity test in healthy adults.健康成年人中 SpotChecks 对比敏感度测试的评估。
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2024 Sep;44(6):1072-1083. doi: 10.1111/opo.13349. Epub 2024 Jun 21.
5
Digital contrast sensitivity chart with varying visual acuity: Development and validation.具有不同视敏度的数字对比敏感度图表:开发与验证
Oman J Ophthalmol. 2023 Oct 18;16(3):467-471. doi: 10.4103/ojo.ojo_260_22. eCollection 2023 Sep-Dec.
6
Clinical assessment of two new contrast sensitivity charts.两种新型对比敏感度图表的临床评估
Br J Ophthalmol. 2007 Jun;91(6):749-52. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2006.109280. Epub 2006 Dec 13.
7
Evaluation of the SpotChecks contrast sensitivity test in children.评价 SpotChecks 对比敏感度测试在儿童中的应用。
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2023 Jan;43(1):64-72. doi: 10.1111/opo.13054. Epub 2022 Sep 26.
8
An evaluation of the Mars Letter Contrast Sensitivity Test.火星信件对比敏感度测试的评估。
Optom Vis Sci. 2005 Nov;82(11):970-5. doi: 10.1097/01.opx.0000187844.27025.ea.
9
The Effect of Test Distance on Visual Contrast Sensitivity Measured Using the Pelli-Robson Chart.测试距离对使用 Pelli-Robson 图表测量的视觉对比敏感度的影响。
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2021 Feb 5;10(2):32. doi: 10.1167/tvst.10.2.32.
10
The letter contrast sensitivity test: clinical evaluation of a new design.字母对比敏感度测试:一种新设计的临床评估
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006 Jun;47(6):2739-45. doi: 10.1167/iovs.05-1419.

本文引用的文献

1
Relationship Between Acuity and Contrast Sensitivity: Differences Due to Eye Disease.视力与对比敏感度之间的关系:眼部疾病导致的差异
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2020 Jun 3;61(6):40. doi: 10.1167/iovs.61.6.40.
2
Contrast Sensitivity Changes in Center Involving Diabetic Macular Edema Treated with Aflibercept.阿柏西普治疗累及黄斑中心凹的糖尿病性黄斑水肿时的对比敏感度变化
Clin Ophthalmol. 2021 Nov 11;15:4439-4445. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S338478. eCollection 2021.
3
Comparing the CamBlobs2 contrast sensitivity test to the near Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity test in normally-sighted young adults.
比较 CamBlobs2 对比敏感度测试与正常视力年轻成年人的近 Pelli-Robson 对比敏感度测试。
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2021 Sep;41(5):1125-1133. doi: 10.1111/opo.12862. Epub 2021 Aug 21.
4
Effects of screen-based retinal light stimulation measured with a novel contrast sensitivity test.屏幕基视网膜光刺激对新型对比敏感度测试的影响。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 29;16(7):e0254877. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254877. eCollection 2021.
5
Measuring the Contrast Sensitivity Function in Non-Neovascular and Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: The Quantitative Contrast Sensitivity Function Test.测量非新生血管性和新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性的对比敏感度函数:定量对比敏感度函数测试
J Clin Med. 2021 Jun 24;10(13):2768. doi: 10.3390/jcm10132768.
6
The Effect of Test Distance on Visual Contrast Sensitivity Measured Using the Pelli-Robson Chart.测试距离对使用 Pelli-Robson 图表测量的视觉对比敏感度的影响。
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2021 Feb 5;10(2):32. doi: 10.1167/tvst.10.2.32.
7
Detecting vision loss in intermediate age-related macular degeneration: A comparison of visual function tests.检测中老年相关性黄斑变性的视力丧失:视觉功能测试的比较。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 16;15(4):e0231748. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231748. eCollection 2020.
8
Development and Validation of a Smartphone-based Contrast Sensitivity Test.基于智能手机的对比敏感度测试的开发与验证
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2019 Sep 13;8(5):13. doi: 10.1167/tvst.8.5.13. eCollection 2019 Sep.
9
The (In)visibility of Groomed Ski Runs.人工修整滑雪道的(不)可见性
Iperception. 2019 Apr 13;10(2):2041669519842895. doi: 10.1177/2041669519842895. eCollection 2019 Mar-Apr.
10
Contrast sensitivity deficits in patients with mutation-proven inherited retinal degenerations.经突变证实的遗传性视网膜变性患者的对比敏感度缺陷
BMC Ophthalmol. 2018 Dec 7;18(1):313. doi: 10.1186/s12886-018-0982-0.