Department of Ophthalmology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
American University, Washington, DC, USA.
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2020 Oct 27;9(11):29. doi: 10.1167/tvst.9.11.29. eCollection 2020 Oct.
This study evaluated a novel tool known as the motion diamond stimulus (MDS), which utilizes contrast-generated illusory motion in dynamic test regions to determine contrast sensitivity (CS).
Patients with treated unilateral retinal vein occlusions (RVOs) underwent three assessments: the MDS, the Pelli-Robson (PR), and the National Eye Institute's Visual Function Questionnaire (VFQ-25). The MDS assessment produced two data end points, α and β. The α value represents the overall contrast threshold level and the β value serves to quantify the adaptability of the visual contrast system. The CS parameters from the MDS and log CS PR output values were used to compare RVO eyes ( = 20) to control eyes ( = 20).
The study participants had a mean composite VFQ-25 score of 89.5 ± 10.4 on the VFQ-25. A significant difference was observed between the RVO eyes and the control eyes in PR log CS scores ( value = 0.0001) and in MDS α value ( value = 0.01). No difference in MDS β value was found between the study groups ( value = 0.39).
The results for the MDS assessment's α parameter corroborated the PR scores, suggesting contrast sensitivity threshold impairment in patients with RVO. No significant difference in β value was observed, suggesting that adaptability of the visual system is maintained in treated RVO eyes.
Currently, visual complaints cannot be entirely identified by Snellen visual acuity alone. The MDS offers potentially a more complete look at visual function, by including contrast sensitivity and may be able to quantify changes otherwise overlooked in retinal disease progression.
本研究评估了一种称为运动钻石刺激(MDS)的新型工具,该工具利用动态测试区域中的对比度产生的错觉运动来确定对比度敏感度(CS)。
接受过单侧视网膜静脉阻塞(RVO)治疗的患者接受了三项评估:MDS、Pelli-Robson(PR)和国家眼科研究所视觉功能问卷(VFQ-25)。MDS 评估产生了两个数据终点,α 和β。α 值代表整体对比度阈值水平,β 值用于量化视觉对比度系统的适应性。MDS 和 log CS PR 输出值的 CS 参数用于比较 RVO 眼(= 20)和对照眼(= 20)。
研究参与者在 VFQ-25 上的平均综合 VFQ-25 得分为 89.5 ± 10.4。在 PR log CS 分数( value = 0.0001)和 MDS α 值( value = 0.01)方面,RVO 眼和对照眼之间观察到显著差异。在研究组之间未发现 MDS β 值的差异( value = 0.39)。
MDS 评估的α参数结果与 PR 评分一致,表明 RVO 患者的对比敏感度阈值受损。未观察到β值的显著差异,表明治疗后的 RVO 眼的视觉系统适应性得以维持。
翻译是否准确,取决于原文是否准确,因此,我无法保证译文的完全正确。