Michel Carine, Cruz Remy
Université de Bourgogne, BP 27877, F-21078 Dijon, France; INSERM, U 1093, Cognition, Action et Plasticité Sensorimotrice, Dijon, F-21078, France.
Université de Bourgogne, BP 27877, F-21078 Dijon, France; INSERM, U 1093, Cognition, Action et Plasticité Sensorimotrice, Dijon, F-21078, France.
Neurosci Lett. 2015 Mar 17;590:145-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2015.02.001. Epub 2015 Feb 4.
The main objective of the present study was to determine the minimal optical deviation responsible for cognitive after-effects in healthy individuals and to explore whether there was a relationship between the degree of optical deviation and cognitive after-effects. Therefore different leftward optical deviations (8°, 10° and 15°) were used in three different groups of healthy participants. Sensorimotor after-effects (evaluating the visuo-manual realignment) were assessed using an open-loop pointing task and cognitive after-effects (evaluating changes in spatial representation) were assessed using manual and perceptual (landmark) line bisection tasks. Results revealed that exposure to 8°, 10° and 15° optical shifts produced sensorimotor after-effects. In contrast, the occurrence of cognitive after-effects depended on the optical deviation. Adaptation to an 8° leftward optical deviation did not produce cognitive after-effects. Adaptation to a 10° leftward optical deviation was responsible for after-effects in the manual line bisection task only. Adaptation to a 15° leftward optical deviation produced after-effects in both the manual and perceptual line bisection tasks. All cognitive after-effects were rightward and were similar to mild, neglect-like manifestations. Both sensorimotor and cognitive after-effects were correlated with the degree of optical deviation. Our results are of methodological and theoretical interest to those interested in sensorimotor plasticity and spatial cognition.
本研究的主要目的是确定健康个体中导致认知后效应的最小视觉偏差,并探讨视觉偏差程度与认知后效应之间是否存在关联。因此,在三组不同的健康参与者中使用了不同程度的向左视觉偏差(8°、10°和15°)。使用开环指向任务评估感觉运动后效应(评估视觉-手动重新校准),并使用手动和感知(地标)线平分任务评估认知后效应(评估空间表征的变化)。结果显示,暴露于8°、10°和15°的视觉偏移会产生感觉运动后效应。相比之下,认知后效应的出现取决于视觉偏差。适应8°向左视觉偏差不会产生认知后效应。适应10°向左视觉偏差仅在手动线平分任务中产生后效应。适应15°向左视觉偏差在手动和感知线平分任务中均产生后效应。所有认知后效应均向右,且类似于轻度的、类似忽视的表现。感觉运动和认知后效应均与视觉偏差程度相关。我们的结果对于那些对感觉运动可塑性和空间认知感兴趣的人具有方法学和理论上的意义。