INSERM UMR1093-CAPS, Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté, UFR des Sciences du Sport, F-21000, Dijon, France.
Sci Rep. 2018 Jul 20;8(1):10982. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-29283-z.
Prism adaptation is a well-known model to study sensorimotor adaptive processes. It has been shown that following prism exposure, after-effects are not only restricted to the sensorimotor level but extend as well to spatial cognition. The main purpose of the present study was to investigate in healthy individuals whether expansion to spatial cognition is restricted to adaptive processes peculiar to prism adaptation or whether it occurs as well following other forms of adaptive process such as adaptation to a novel dynamic environment during pointing movements. Representational after-effects were assessed by the perceptual line bisection task before and after adaptation to a leftward or a rightward force field. The main results showed that adaptation developed at sensorimotor level but did not influence space representation. Our results have therefore a strong methodological impact for prospective investigations focusing on sensorimotor plasticity while sparing space cognition. These methodological considerations will be particulary relevant when addressing sensorimotor plasticity in patients with specific representational feature to preserve. The discussion highlights the differences between prism and dynamic adaptation that could explain the lack of after-effect on space representation following force field adaptation.
视轴偏差适应是一种研究感觉运动适应性过程的常用模型。已有研究表明,在进行视轴偏差适应后,不仅会产生局限于感觉运动水平的后效,还会扩展到空间认知。本研究的主要目的是在健康个体中探究,空间认知的扩展是否仅局限于视轴偏差适应所特有的适应性过程,或者它是否也会出现在其他形式的适应性过程中,例如在指向运动中适应新的动态环境。通过在适应左或右力场前后进行感知线二分任务来评估代表性后效。主要结果表明,适应是在感觉运动水平上发展的,但不会影响空间表示。因此,我们的研究结果对视轴偏差适应性研究具有强烈的方法学影响,同时避免了对空间认知的影响。当针对具有特定代表性特征的患者来保留感觉运动适应性时,这些方法学考虑将特别重要。讨论强调了视轴偏差适应和动态适应之间的差异,这可以解释在力场适应后对空间认知没有后效的原因。