Suppr超能文献

电子烟使用者的抽吸地形学与尼古丁摄入量

Puffing topography and nicotine intake of electronic cigarette users.

作者信息

Behar Rachel Z, Hua My, Talbot Prue

机构信息

Cell Molecular and Developmental Biology Graduate Program, University of California Riverside, Riverside, California, United States of America; Department of Cell Biology and Neuroscience, University of California Riverside, Riverside, California, United States of America.

Department of Cell Biology and Neuroscience, University of California Riverside, Riverside, California, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2015 Feb 9;10(2):e0117222. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117222. eCollection 2015.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Prior electronic cigarette (EC) topography data are based on two video analyses with limited parameters. Alternate methods for measuring topography are needed to understand EC use and nicotine intake.

OBJECTIVES

This study evaluated EC topography with a CReSS Pocket device and quantified nicotine intake.

METHODS

Validation tests on pressure drop, flow rate, and volume confirmed reliable performance of the CReSS Pocket device. Twenty participants used Blu Cigs and V2 Cigs for 10 minute intervals with a 10-15 minute break between brands. Brand order was reversed and repeated within 7 days Data were analyzed to determine puff duration, puff count, volume, flow rate, peak flow, and inter-puff interval. Nicotine intake was estimated from cartomizer fluid consumption and topography data.

RESULTS

Nine patterns of EC use were identified. The average puff count and inter-puff interval were 32 puffs and 17.9 seconds. All participants, except one, took more than 20 puffs/10 minutes. The averages for puff duration (2.65 seconds/puff), volume/puff (51 ml/puff), total puff volume (1,579 ml), EC fluid consumption (79.6 mg), flow rate (20 ml/s), and peak flow rate (27 ml/s) were determined for 10-minute sessions. All parameters except total puff count were significantly different for Blu versus V2 EC. Total volume for Blu versus V2 was four-times higher than for conventional cigarettes. Average nicotine intake for Blu and V2 across both sessions was 1.2 ± 0.5 mg and 1.4 ± 0.7 mg, respectively, which is similar to conventional smokers.

CONCLUSIONS

EC puffing topography was variable among participants in the study, but often similar within an individual between brands or days. Puff duration, inter-puff interval, and puff volume varied from conventional cigarette standards. Data on total puff volume and nicotine intake are consistent with compensatory usage of EC. These data can contribute to the development of a standard protocol for laboratory testing of EC products.

摘要

背景

先前的电子烟(EC)形貌数据基于两项参数有限的视频分析。需要采用其他测量形貌的方法来了解电子烟的使用情况和尼古丁摄入量。

目的

本研究使用CReSS Pocket设备评估电子烟形貌并量化尼古丁摄入量。

方法

对压降、流速和体积进行的验证测试证实了CReSS Pocket设备的可靠性能。20名参与者使用Blu Cigs和V2 Cigs,每次使用10分钟,两个品牌之间休息10 - 15分钟。品牌顺序颠倒,并在7天内重复。对数据进行分析以确定抽吸持续时间、抽吸次数、体积、流速、峰值流速和抽吸间隔。根据雾化器液体消耗量和形貌数据估算尼古丁摄入量。

结果

确定了9种电子烟使用模式。平均抽吸次数和抽吸间隔分别为32次和17.9秒。除一人外,所有参与者每10分钟抽吸次数超过20次。确定了10分钟时段的抽吸持续时间(每次抽吸2.65秒)、每次抽吸体积(51毫升/次)、总抽吸体积(1579毫升)、电子烟液体消耗量(79.6毫克)、流速(20毫升/秒)和峰值流速(27毫升/秒)的平均值。除总抽吸次数外,Blu与V2电子烟的所有参数均存在显著差异。Blu与V2的总体积是传统香烟的四倍。两个时段Blu和V2的平均尼古丁摄入量分别为1.2±0.5毫克和1.4±0.7毫克,与传统吸烟者相似。

结论

在本研究中,参与者之间的电子烟抽吸形貌各不相同,但在个体内不同品牌或不同日期之间通常相似。抽吸持续时间、抽吸间隔和抽吸体积与传统香烟标准不同。总抽吸体积和尼古丁摄入量的数据与电子烟的补偿性使用一致。这些数据有助于制定电子烟产品实验室测试的标准方案。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5ad/4321841/96ddba847d70/pone.0117222.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验