Davis Barbara, Dang Michael, Kim Jisoo, Talbot Prue
Cell Molecular and Developmental Biology Graduate Program, University of California, Riverside, CA; Department of Cell Biology and Neuroscience, University of California, Riverside, CA.
Department of Cell Biology and Neuroscience, University of California, Riverside, CA.
Nicotine Tob Res. 2015 Feb;17(2):134-41. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntu080. Epub 2014 May 26.
We evaluated the accuracy of nicotine concentration labeling on electronic cigarette refill products.
The nicotine concentration of 71 electronic cigarette refill fluid products and 1 related do-it-yourself (DIY) product was quantified using high-performance liquid chromatography. Quantified data were compared with manufacturers labeled concentrations. Duplicate refill fluid products purchased at different times were evaluated by visual comparison of fluid coloration and quantified nicotine concentration.
Thirty-five of the 54 nicotine-containing fluids had quantified nicotine concentrations that deviated by more than ± 10% from the manufacturer labels, with 46 of 50 being in excess of labeled values. Refill fluids labeled as 0 nicotine had no detectable nicotine. Of the 5 products that were unlabeled for nicotine concentration, 3 contained no detectable nicotine, whereas the remaining 2 contained nicotine in excess of 100mg/ml and may have been intended for DIY use. Sixteen of the 18 duplicate bottles of refill fluid varied greatly in their nicotine concentrations. One of the 5 companies showed significant improvement in labeling accuracy among the most recently purchased products. Of the 23 total duplicate pairs, 15 of 23 varied in coloration from their mates.
Nicotine concentration labeling on electronic cigarette refill products was often inaccurate but showed improvement recently in products from 1 company. To ensure the safety of refill fluids and DIY products, it is necessary to establish quality control guidelines for the manufacturing and labeling and to monitor products longitudinally.
我们评估了电子烟补充装产品上尼古丁浓度标签的准确性。
使用高效液相色谱法定量分析了71种电子烟补充装液体产品和1种相关的自制(DIY)产品的尼古丁浓度。将定量数据与制造商标注的浓度进行比较。通过对补充装液体颜色的目视比较和定量尼古丁浓度,对在不同时间购买的重复补充装液体产品进行评估。
54种含尼古丁的液体中,有35种的定量尼古丁浓度与制造商标签的偏差超过±10%,其中50种中有46种超过标注值。标注为0尼古丁的补充装液体未检测到尼古丁。在5种未标注尼古丁浓度的产品中,3种未检测到尼古丁,而其余2种含有超过100mg/ml的尼古丁,可能是用于DIY的。18瓶重复的补充装液体中有16瓶的尼古丁浓度差异很大。5家公司中有1家在最近购买的产品中标签准确性有显著提高。在总共23对重复产品中,有15对的颜色与配对产品不同。
电子烟补充装产品上的尼古丁浓度标签常常不准确,但最近1家公司的产品有所改进。为确保补充装液体和DIY产品的安全,有必要为生产和标签制定质量控制指南,并对产品进行长期监测。