野外捕获及实验室适应的、具有不同寄主植物利用情况和专一性的澳大利亚实蝇科果蝇物种的微生物组
The Microbiome of Field-Caught and Laboratory-Adapted Australian Tephritid Fruit Fly Species with Different Host Plant Use and Specialisation.
作者信息
Morrow J L, Frommer M, Shearman D C A, Riegler M
机构信息
Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment, University of Western Sydney, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW, 2751, Australia,
出版信息
Microb Ecol. 2015 Aug;70(2):498-508. doi: 10.1007/s00248-015-0571-1. Epub 2015 Feb 10.
Tephritid fruit fly species display a diversity of host plant specialisation on a scale from monophagy to polyphagy. Furthermore, while some species prefer ripening fruit, a few are restricted to damaged or rotting fruit. Such a diversity of host plant use may be reflected in the microbial symbiont diversity of tephritids and their grade of dependency on their microbiomes. Here, we investigated the microbiome of six tephritid species from three genera, including species that are polyphagous pests (Bactrocera tryoni, Bactrocera neohumeralis, Bactrocera jarvisi, Ceratitis capitata) and a monophagous specialist (Bactrocera cacuminata). These were compared with the microbiome of a non-pestiferous but polyphagous tephritid species that is restricted to damaged or rotting fruit (Dirioxa pornia). The bacterial community associated with whole fruit flies was analysed by 16S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) amplicon pyrosequencing to detect potential drivers of taxonomic composition. Overall, the dominant bacterial families were Enterobacteriaceae and Acetobacteraceae (both Proteobacteria), and Streptococcaceae and Enterococcaceae (both Firmicutes). Comparisons across species and genera found different microbial composition in the three tephritid genera, but limited consistent differentiation between Bactrocera species. Within Bactrocera species, differentiation of microbial composition seemed to be influenced by the environment, possibly including their diets; beyond this, tephritid species identity or ecology also had an effect. The microbiome of D. pornia was most distinct from the other five species, which may be due to its ecologically different niche of rotting or damaged fruit, as opposed to ripening fruit favoured by the other species. Our study is the first amplicon pyrosequencing study to compare the microbiomes of tephritid species and thus delivers important information about the turnover of microbial diversity within and between fruit fly species and their potential application in pest management strategies.
实蝇科果蝇物种在从单食性到多食性的范围内表现出多种寄主植物专一性。此外,虽然一些物种偏好成熟果实,但少数物种仅限于取食受损或腐烂的果实。这种寄主植物利用的多样性可能反映在实蝇的微生物共生体多样性及其对微生物群落的依赖程度上。在这里,我们研究了来自三个属的六种实蝇的微生物群落,包括多食性害虫物种(昆士兰果实蝇、新肩带果实蝇、贾氏果实蝇、地中海实蝇)和一种单食性专食性物种(尖翅果实蝇)。将这些与一种非害虫但多食性的实蝇物种(Dirioxa pornia)的微生物群落进行了比较,该物种仅限于取食受损或腐烂的果实。通过16S核糖体DNA(rDNA)扩增子焦磷酸测序分析与整个果蝇相关的细菌群落,以检测分类组成的潜在驱动因素。总体而言,优势细菌科为肠杆菌科和醋杆菌科(均为变形菌门),以及链球菌科和肠球菌科(均为厚壁菌门)。跨物种和属的比较发现,三个实蝇属的微生物组成不同,但果实蝇属物种之间的一致分化有限。在果实蝇属物种中,微生物组成的分化似乎受环境影响,可能包括它们的食物;除此之外,实蝇物种的身份或生态也有影响。Dirioxa pornia的微生物群落与其他五个物种最为不同,这可能是由于其在腐烂或受损果实上的生态位与其他物种偏好的成熟果实不同。我们的研究是第一项比较实蝇物种微生物群落的扩增子焦磷酸测序研究,因此提供了有关果蝇物种内部和之间微生物多样性变化及其在害虫管理策略中的潜在应用的重要信息。