Suppr超能文献

考虑严重CFTR突变时囊性纤维化患者的鼻电位差

Nasal potential difference in cystic fibrosis considering severe CFTR mutations.

作者信息

Ng Ronny Tah Yen, Marson Fernando Augusto de Lima, Ribeiro Jose Dirceu, Ribeiro Antonio Fernando, Bertuzzo Carmen Silvia, Ribeiro Maria Angela Gonçalves de Oliveira, Severino Silvana Dalge, Sakano Eulalia

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology, State University of Campinas (Unicamp), 13083-887 Campinas, SP, Brazil.

Department of Pediatrics, Center for Pediatrics Research (CIPED), State University of Campinas (Unicamp), 13083-887 Campinas, SP, Brazil ; Department of Medical Genetics, State University of Campinas (Unicamp), 13083-887 Campinas, SP, Brazil.

出版信息

Dis Markers. 2015;2015:306825. doi: 10.1155/2015/306825. Epub 2015 Jan 15.

Abstract

The gold standard for diagnosing cystic fibrosis (CF) is a sweat chloride value above 60 mEq/L. However, this historical and important tool has limitations; other techniques should be studied, including the nasal potential difference (NPD) test. CFTR gene sequencing can identify CFTR mutations, but this method is time-consuming and too expensive to be used in all CF centers. The present study compared CF patients with two classes I-III CFTR mutations (10 patients) (G1), CF patients with classes IV-VI CFTR mutations (five patients) (G2), and 21 healthy subjects (G3). The CF patients and healthy subjects also underwent the NPD test. A statistical analysis was performed using the Mann-Whitney, Kruskal-Wallis, χ(2), and Fisher's exact tests, α = 0.05. No differences were observed between the CF patients and healthy controls for the PDMax, Δamiloride, and Δchloride + free + amiloride markers from the NPD test. For the finger value, a difference between G2 and G3 was described. The Wilschanski index values were different between G1 and G3. In conclusion, our data showed that NPD is useful for CF diagnosis when classes I-III CFTR mutations are screened. However, if classes IV-VI are considered, the NPD test showed an overlap in values with healthy subjects.

摘要

诊断囊性纤维化(CF)的金标准是汗液氯化物值高于60 mEq/L。然而,这一具有历史意义的重要工具存在局限性;应该研究其他技术,包括鼻电位差(NPD)测试。CFTR基因测序可以识别CFTR突变,但这种方法耗时且成本过高,无法在所有CF中心使用。本研究比较了患有I - III类CFTR突变的CF患者(10例)(G1组)、患有IV - VI类CFTR突变的CF患者(5例)(G2组)和21名健康受试者(G3组)。CF患者和健康受试者也接受了NPD测试。使用Mann - Whitney检验、Kruskal - Wallis检验、χ(2)检验和Fisher精确检验进行统计分析,α = 0.05。在NPD测试的PDMax、阿米洛利变化值和氯化物 + 游离 + 阿米洛利变化值方面,CF患者和健康对照之间未观察到差异。对于手指值,描述了G2组和G3组之间的差异。G1组和G3组之间的Wilschanski指数值不同。总之,我们的数据表明,在筛查I - III类CFTR突变时,NPD对CF诊断有用。然而,如果考虑IV - VI类突变,NPD测试显示其值与健康受试者存在重叠。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1a8f/4312569/dea6727db5f3/DM2015-306825.001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验