Faraut Brice, Nakib Samir, Drogou Catherine, Elbaz Maxime, Sauvet Fabien, De Bandt Jean-Pascal, Léger Damien
Université Paris Descartes-Sorbonne Paris Cité, APHP, Hôtel Dieu de Paris, Centre du Sommeil et de la Vigilance (B.F., C.D., M.E., F.S., D.L.), EA 7330 VIFASOM, Paris, France; Université Paris Descartes-Sorbonne Paris Cité, APHP, Hôtel Dieu de Paris, Laboratoire de Chimie Clinique et Laboratoire de Biologie de la Nutrition (S.N., J-P.D.), EA 4466, Centre de Recherche Pharmaceutique de Paris, France; IRBA (Institut de Recherche Biomédicale des Armées) (C.D., F.S.), Unité Fatique Vigilance, Paris, France.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015 Mar;100(3):E416-26. doi: 10.1210/jc.2014-2566. Epub 2015 Feb 10.
Neuroendocrine and immune stresses imposed by chronic sleep restriction are known to be involved in the harmful cardiovascular effects associated with poor sleep.
Despite a well-known beneficial effect of napping on alertness, its effects on neuroendocrine stress and immune responses after sleep restriction are largely unknown.
This study was a strictly controlled (sleep-wake status, light environment, caloric intake), crossover, randomized design in continuously polysomnography-monitored subjects.
The study was conducted in a laboratory-based study.
The subjects were 11 healthy young men.
We investigated the effects on neuroendocrine and immune biomarkers of a night of sleep restricted to 2 h followed by a day without naps or with 30 minute morning and afternoon naps, both conditions followed by an ad libitum recovery night starting at 20:00.
Salivary interleukin-6 and urinary catecholamines were assessed throughout the daytime study periods.
The increase in norepinephrine values seen at the end of the afternoon after the sleep-restricted night was not present when the subjects had the opportunity to take naps. Interleukin-6 changes observed after sleep deprivation were also normalized after napping. During the recovery day in the no-nap condition, there were increased levels of afternoon epinephrine and dopamine, which was not the case in the nap condition. A recovery night after napping was associated with a reduced amount of slow-wave sleep compared to after the no-nap condition.
Our data suggest that napping has stress-releasing and immune effects. Napping could be easily applied in real settings as a countermeasure to the detrimental health consequences of sleep debt.
慢性睡眠限制所施加的神经内分泌和免疫应激已知与睡眠不佳相关的有害心血管影响有关。
尽管午睡对警觉性有众所周知的有益作用,但其对睡眠限制后神经内分泌应激和免疫反应的影响在很大程度上尚不清楚。
本研究是一项在持续多导睡眠图监测的受试者中进行的严格控制(睡眠-觉醒状态、光照环境、热量摄入)、交叉、随机设计。
该研究在基于实验室的研究中进行。
受试者为11名健康年轻男性。
我们研究了一晚睡眠限制在2小时,随后一天不午睡或有30分钟上午和下午午睡对神经内分泌和免疫生物标志物的影响,两种情况之后均从20:00开始自由恢复睡眠一晚。
在白天研究期间评估唾液白细胞介素-6和尿儿茶酚胺。
当受试者有机会午睡时,睡眠限制夜后下午结束时观察到的去甲肾上腺素值升高不存在。睡眠剥夺后观察到的白细胞介素-6变化在午睡后也恢复正常。在无午睡条件下的恢复日,下午肾上腺素和多巴胺水平升高,而在午睡条件下则不然。与无午睡条件后相比,午睡后的恢复夜慢波睡眠量减少。
我们的数据表明午睡具有释放应激和免疫作用。午睡可以很容易地在实际环境中应用,作为应对睡眠债对健康有害后果的一种对策。