Suppr超能文献

当狼疮性肾炎活动指数的组织学评分较高时,随机尿蛋白/肌酐比值对24小时蛋白尿的估计并不可靠。

Spot urine protein/creatinine ratio is unreliable estimate of 24 h proteinuria in lupus nephritis when the histological scores of activity index are higher.

作者信息

Zhang Q, Sun L, Jin L

机构信息

Department of Nephrology, Lishui Center Hospital, Lishui, China.

Department of Nephrology, Lishui Center Hospital, Lishui, China

出版信息

Lupus. 2015 Aug;24(9):943-7. doi: 10.1177/0961203315570688. Epub 2015 Feb 9.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation and agreement of spot urine protein/creatinine (P/C) ratio with 24 h proteinuria in patients with lupus nephritis (LN) under different scores of activity index (AI).

METHODS

In total, 90 pairs of 24 h urine and spot urine samples from 90 patients with biopsy-proven LN were analyzed. The correlation and agreement between the two sample types were assessed by Pearson correlation and intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) using mixed model for repeated measurements, respectively.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Overall, 24 h proteinuria correlated strongly with the spot urine P/C ratio (r = 0.671, p < 0.001) with a good agreement (ICC = 0.656, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.52-0.76). Subgroup analyses revealed that the correlation remained high in all groups (r = 0.825, p < 0.001; r = 0.567, p = 0.001; r = 0.686, p = 0.020), the agreement in group A (low AI) was good (ICC = 0.824, 95% CI: 0.70-0.89), but in group B (middle AI) and group C (high AI), the agreements were weak (ICC = 0.503, 95% CI: 0.19-0.72; ICC = 0.532, 95% CI: 0.06-0.84). Our work suggests that over the range of a higher AI, however, correlation was present but agreement was poor.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估狼疮性肾炎(LN)患者在不同活动指数(AI)评分下,随机尿蛋白/肌酐(P/C)比值与24小时蛋白尿之间的相关性和一致性。

方法

共分析了90例经活检证实为LN患者的90对24小时尿液和随机尿液样本。分别采用Pearson相关性分析和重复测量混合模型的组内相关系数(ICC)评估两种样本类型之间的相关性和一致性。

结果与结论

总体而言,24小时蛋白尿与随机尿P/C比值高度相关(r = 0.671,p < 0.001),一致性良好(ICC = 0.656,95%置信区间(CI):0.52 - 0.76)。亚组分析显示,所有组的相关性均较高(r = 0.825,p < 0.001;r = 0.567,p = 0.001;r = 0.686,p = 0.020),A组(低AI)的一致性良好(ICC = 0.824,95% CI:0.70 - 0.89),但B组(中AI)和C组(高AI)的一致性较弱(ICC = 0.503,95% CI:0.19 - 0.72;ICC = 0.532,95% CI:0.06 - 0.84)。我们的研究表明,然而,在较高AI范围内,存在相关性但一致性较差。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验