Nuver-Zwart I H, van Riel P L, van de Putte L B, Gribnau F W
Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Ann Rheum Dis. 1989 May;48(5):389-95. doi: 10.1136/ard.48.5.389.
In a double blind, single observer, 48 week study the effects of sulphasalazine (2 g daily) and hydroxychloroquine (400 mg daily months 0-6, thereafter 200 mg daily) were compared in 60 patients with definite or classical rheumatoid arthritis. They had not been treated previously with second line drugs. The onset of response with sulphasalazine was earlier than with hydroxychloroquine. After 48 weeks a comparison of the treatments showed no statistically significant differences in disease activity variables. Adverse reaction was the main reason for withdrawal in the sulphasalazine group and lack of efficacy in the hydroxychloroquine group. All adverse reactions, one being agranulocytosis after eight weeks of sulphasalazine treatment, appeared in the first three months of treatment and were completely reversible.
在一项双盲、单观察者、为期48周的研究中,对60例确诊或典型类风湿性关节炎患者比较了柳氮磺胺吡啶(每日2克)和羟氯喹(0至6个月每日400毫克,此后每日200毫克)的疗效。这些患者此前未接受过二线药物治疗。柳氮磺胺吡啶的起效时间早于羟氯喹。48周后,对两种治疗方法的比较显示,疾病活动变量方面无统计学显著差异。不良反应是柳氮磺胺吡啶组停药的主要原因,而羟氯喹组停药主要是因为缺乏疗效。所有不良反应均出现在治疗的前三个月,且完全可逆,其中一例是柳氮磺胺吡啶治疗八周后出现的粒细胞缺乏症。