Leiter Amanda, Diefenbach Michael A, Doucette John, Oh William K, Galsky Matthew D
Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Clin Trials. 2015 Jun;12(3):215-23. doi: 10.1177/1740774515571917. Epub 2015 Feb 10.
Lack of clinical trial awareness is a known obstacle to clinical trial enrollment. We sought to define the prevalence of clinical trial awareness in the US population, determine characteristics associated with increased trial awareness, and explore potential disparities in trial awareness.
We utilized data from the Health Information National Trends Survey from 2008 and 2012. Logistic regression was utilized to assess predictors of clinical trial awareness, particularly sociodemographic variables and information-seeking preferences. Trial awareness and information-seeking preferences were compared in patient subgroups and between the two time periods.
Clinical trial awareness increased from 68% to 74% between 2008 and 2012. In the 2012 dataset, higher education level (odds ratio: 3.52, 95% confidence interval: 2.16-5.74), higher yearly income category (odds ratio: 1.84, 95% confidence interval: 1.17-2.89), and Internet use (odds ratio: 2.13, 95% confidence interval: 1.52-3.00) were significantly associated with clinical trial awareness. Hispanic ethnicity (odds ratio: 0.41, 95% confidence interval: 0.25-0.68) was significantly associated with decreased awareness. Clinical trial awareness increased in African-American/Blacks (Δ10.6%) and Hispanics (Δ10.7%) between 2008 and 2012, as did Internet use in both subgroups (Δ14.2%, Δ18.1%, respectively).
Overall clinical trial awareness has increased between 2008 and 2012, although a large subset of the population still lacks general awareness of clinical trials. Racial and ethnic disparities in trial awareness exist, although disparities may be decreasing among the Black population. These findings may help target educational efforts and inform approaches to increasing trial awareness.
缺乏临床试验意识是已知的临床试验入组障碍。我们试图确定美国人群中临床试验意识的患病率,确定与更高试验意识相关的特征,并探讨试验意识方面的潜在差异。
我们利用了2008年和2012年《健康信息国家趋势调查》的数据。采用逻辑回归评估临床试验意识的预测因素,特别是社会人口统计学变量和信息寻求偏好。在患者亚组以及两个时间段之间比较了试验意识和信息寻求偏好。
2008年至2012年期间,临床试验意识从68%提高到74%。在2012年的数据集中,较高的教育水平(优势比:3.52,95%置信区间:2.16 - 5.74)、较高的年收入类别(优势比:1.84,95%置信区间:1.17 - 2.89)以及互联网使用(优势比:2.13,95%置信区间:1.52 - 3.00)与临床试验意识显著相关。西班牙裔(优势比:0.41,95%置信区间:0.25 - 0.68)与意识降低显著相关。2008年至2012年期间,非裔美国人/黑人(增加10.6%)和西班牙裔(增加10.7%)的临床试验意识有所提高,两个亚组的互联网使用情况也有所增加(分别增加14.2%、18.1%)。
2008年至2012年期间,总体临床试验意识有所提高,尽管很大一部分人群仍然缺乏对临床试验的普遍认识。试验意识存在种族和族裔差异,尽管黑人人群中的差异可能正在缩小。这些发现可能有助于确定教育工作的目标,并为提高试验意识的方法提供参考。