颈椎硬膜外注射能长期缓解颈部和上肢疼痛吗?一项系统评价。
Do cervical epidural injections provide long-term relief in neck and upper extremity pain? A systematic review.
作者信息
Manchikanti Laxmaiah, Nampiaparampil Devi E, Candido Kenneth D, Bakshi Sanjay, Grider Jay S, Falco Frank J E, Sehgal Nalini, Hirsch Joshua A
机构信息
Pain Management Center of Paducah, Paducah, KY, and University of Louisville, Louisville, KY; New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY.
出版信息
Pain Physician. 2015 Jan-Feb;18(1):39-60.
BACKGROUND
The high prevalence of chronic persistent neck pain not only leads to disability but also has a significant economic, societal, and health impact. Among multiple modalities of treatments prescribed in the management of neck and upper extremity pain, surgical, interventional and conservative modalities have been described. Cervical epidural injections are also common modalities of treatments provided in managing neck and upper extremity pain. They are administered by either an interlaminar approach or transforaminal approach.
OBJECTIVES
To determine the long-term efficacy of cervical interlaminar and transforaminal epidural injections in the treatment of cervical disc herniation, spinal stenosis, discogenic pain without facet joint pain, and post surgery syndrome.
METHODS
The literature search was performed from 1966 to October 2014 utilizing data from PubMed, Cochrane Library, US National Guideline Clearinghouse, previous systematic reviews, and cross-references. The evidence was assessed based on best evidence synthesis with Level I to Level V.
RESULTS
There were 7 manuscripts meeting inclusion criteria. Of these, 4 assessed the role of interlaminar epidural injections for managing disc herniation or radiculitis, and 3 assessed these injections for managing central spinal stenosis, discogenic pain without facet joint pain, and post surgery syndrome. There were 4 high quality manuscripts. A qualitative synthesis of evidence showed there is Level II evidence for each etiology category. The evidence is based on one relevant, high quality trial supporting the efficacy of cervical interlaminar epidural injections for each particular etiology. There were no randomized trials available assessing the efficacy of cervical transforaminal epidural injections.
LIMITATIONS
Paucity of available literature, specifically conditions other than disc herniation.
CONCLUSION
This systematic review with qualitative best evidence synthesis shows Level II evidence for the efficacy of cervical interlaminar epidural injections with local anesthetic with or without steroids, based on at least one high-quality relevant randomized control trial in each category for disc herniation, discogenic pain without facet joint pain, central spinal stenosis, and post surgery syndrome.
背景
慢性持续性颈痛的高患病率不仅会导致残疾,还会对经济、社会和健康产生重大影响。在颈部和上肢疼痛管理中所采用的多种治疗方式中,已描述了手术、介入和保守治疗方式。颈椎硬膜外注射也是治疗颈部和上肢疼痛的常用方式。可通过椎板间入路或经椎间孔入路进行注射。
目的
确定颈椎椎板间和经椎间孔硬膜外注射治疗颈椎间盘突出症、椎管狭窄、无小关节疼痛的椎间盘源性疼痛及术后综合征的长期疗效。
方法
利用来自PubMed、Cochrane图书馆、美国国家指南资料库、既往系统评价及交叉参考文献的数据,检索1966年至2014年10月期间的文献。基于最佳证据综合,按照I级至V级对证据进行评估。
结果
有7篇手稿符合纳入标准。其中,4篇评估了椎板间硬膜外注射在治疗椎间盘突出症或神经根炎中的作用,3篇评估了这些注射在治疗中央椎管狭窄、无小关节疼痛的椎间盘源性疼痛及术后综合征中的作用。有4篇高质量手稿。证据的定性综合显示,每种病因类别均有II级证据。该证据基于一项相关的高质量试验,支持颈椎椎板间硬膜外注射对每种特定病因的疗效。尚无评估颈椎经椎间孔硬膜外注射疗效的随机试验。
局限性
可用文献匮乏,尤其是除椎间盘突出症以外的情况。
结论
这项采用定性最佳证据综合的系统评价显示,基于在椎间盘突出症、无小关节疼痛的椎间盘源性疼痛、中央椎管狭窄及术后综合征各类别中至少一项高质量相关随机对照试验,颈椎椎板间硬膜外注射联合或不联合类固醇局部麻醉剂具有疗效的证据为II级。