Morgalla M H, Tatagiba M
Neurodiagn J. 2014 Dec;54(4):338-52. doi: 10.1080/21646821.2014.11106818.
The prediction of the long-term outcome of comatose patients after severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) using early somatosensory and acoustic evoked potentials is controversial. It was our aim to examine the different single components of the evoked potentials regarding their predictive capacity in comatose patients.
We examined the amplitude and latency of the wave N20, the amplitude differences between right and left hemisphere, the central conduction time (CCT), the amplitude ratio N20 left/N20 right, the amplitude and latency of peak V, the inter-peak latency I-V and the amplitude ratio V/I. The long-term clinical outcome of the patients was re-evaluated 3 years after their discharge and correlated with the different components.
Only the central conduction time (CCT) and the latency of the wave N20 indicated a statistical correlation with the later outcome (p = 0.0366). The amplitude ratio of wave V/I of the EAEP did not reveal a significant statistical difference between the various outcome groups.
In this study, the use of single components of the SSEP and EAEP per se could not predict the long-term clinical outcome after TBI. Combined systems such as the Riffel Score are necessary in order to achieve this goal.
使用早期体感诱发电位和听觉诱发电位预测重度创伤性脑损伤(TBI)后昏迷患者的长期预后存在争议。我们的目的是研究诱发电位的不同单一成分对昏迷患者的预测能力。
我们检测了N20波的波幅和潜伏期、左右半球之间的波幅差异、中枢传导时间(CCT)、N20左/N20右波幅比值、V波峰的波幅和潜伏期、V波峰间潜伏期I-V以及V/I波幅比值。患者出院3年后对其长期临床预后进行重新评估,并与不同成分进行相关性分析。
仅中枢传导时间(CCT)和N20波潜伏期与后期预后存在统计学相关性(p = 0.0366)。听觉脑干诱发电位(BAEP)的V/I波幅比值在不同预后组之间未显示出显著的统计学差异。
在本研究中,单独使用体感诱发电位(SSEP)和听觉脑干诱发电位(BAEP)的单一成分无法预测TBI后的长期临床预后。为实现这一目标,诸如里费尔评分等联合系统是必要的。