• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用早期体感诱发电位和听觉诱发电位预测创伤性脑损伤后的长期预后:对诱发电位不同单一成分预测价值的分析

Long-term outcome prediction after a traumatic brain injury using early somatosensory and acoustic evoked potentials: analysis of the predictive value of the different single components of the potentials.

作者信息

Morgalla M H, Tatagiba M

出版信息

Neurodiagn J. 2014 Dec;54(4):338-52. doi: 10.1080/21646821.2014.11106818.

DOI:10.1080/21646821.2014.11106818
PMID:25675704
Abstract

PURPOSE

The prediction of the long-term outcome of comatose patients after severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) using early somatosensory and acoustic evoked potentials is controversial. It was our aim to examine the different single components of the evoked potentials regarding their predictive capacity in comatose patients.

METHODS

We examined the amplitude and latency of the wave N20, the amplitude differences between right and left hemisphere, the central conduction time (CCT), the amplitude ratio N20 left/N20 right, the amplitude and latency of peak V, the inter-peak latency I-V and the amplitude ratio V/I. The long-term clinical outcome of the patients was re-evaluated 3 years after their discharge and correlated with the different components.

RESULTS

Only the central conduction time (CCT) and the latency of the wave N20 indicated a statistical correlation with the later outcome (p = 0.0366). The amplitude ratio of wave V/I of the EAEP did not reveal a significant statistical difference between the various outcome groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, the use of single components of the SSEP and EAEP per se could not predict the long-term clinical outcome after TBI. Combined systems such as the Riffel Score are necessary in order to achieve this goal.

摘要

目的

使用早期体感诱发电位和听觉诱发电位预测重度创伤性脑损伤(TBI)后昏迷患者的长期预后存在争议。我们的目的是研究诱发电位的不同单一成分对昏迷患者的预测能力。

方法

我们检测了N20波的波幅和潜伏期、左右半球之间的波幅差异、中枢传导时间(CCT)、N20左/N20右波幅比值、V波峰的波幅和潜伏期、V波峰间潜伏期I-V以及V/I波幅比值。患者出院3年后对其长期临床预后进行重新评估,并与不同成分进行相关性分析。

结果

仅中枢传导时间(CCT)和N20波潜伏期与后期预后存在统计学相关性(p = 0.0366)。听觉脑干诱发电位(BAEP)的V/I波幅比值在不同预后组之间未显示出显著的统计学差异。

结论

在本研究中,单独使用体感诱发电位(SSEP)和听觉脑干诱发电位(BAEP)的单一成分无法预测TBI后的长期临床预后。为实现这一目标,诸如里费尔评分等联合系统是必要的。

相似文献

1
Long-term outcome prediction after a traumatic brain injury using early somatosensory and acoustic evoked potentials: analysis of the predictive value of the different single components of the potentials.使用早期体感诱发电位和听觉诱发电位预测创伤性脑损伤后的长期预后:对诱发电位不同单一成分预测价值的分析
Neurodiagn J. 2014 Dec;54(4):338-52. doi: 10.1080/21646821.2014.11106818.
2
[Coma. The prognostic value of evoked potentials in patients after traumatic brain injury].[昏迷。创伤性脑损伤患者诱发电位的预后价值]
Anaesthesist. 2006 Jul;55(7):760-8. doi: 10.1007/s00101-006-1036-1.
3
The role of middle latency evoked potentials in early prediction of favorable outcomes among patients with severe ischemic brain injuries.中潜伏期诱发电位在重度缺血性脑损伤患者良好预后早期预测中的作用。
J Neurol Sci. 2014 Oct 15;345(1-2):112-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2014.07.021. Epub 2014 Jul 18.
4
Central somatosensory conduction time and acoustic brainstem transmission time in post-traumatic coma.创伤后昏迷中的中枢体感传导时间和听性脑干传导时间
J Clin Neurophysiol. 1988 Jul;5(3):237-60. doi: 10.1097/00004691-198807000-00002.
5
The prognostic value of somatosensory evoked potentials in traumatic primary and secondary brain stem lesions.体感诱发电位在创伤性原发性和继发性脑干损伤中的预后价值。
Zentralbl Neurochir. 2004;65(1):25-31. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-44885.
6
The prognostic value of evoked responses from primary somatosensory and auditory cortex in comatose patients.昏迷患者初级体感皮层和听觉皮层诱发反应的预后价值。
Clin Neurophysiol. 2003 Sep;114(9):1615-27. doi: 10.1016/s1388-2457(03)00086-5.
7
Prediction of 'awakening' and outcome in prolonged acute coma from severe traumatic brain injury: evidence for validity of short latency SEPs.严重创伤性脑损伤所致长期急性昏迷中“苏醒”及预后的预测:短潜伏期体感诱发电位有效性的证据
Clin Neurophysiol. 2005 Jan;116(1):229-35. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2004.07.008.
8
Central somatosensory conduction time and short latency somatosensory evoked potentials in post-traumatic coma.创伤后昏迷中的中枢体感传导时间和短潜伏期体感诱发电位
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1983 Dec;56(6):583-96. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(83)90026-3.
9
Median-evoked somatosensory potentials in severe brain injury: does initial loss of cortical potentials exclude recovery?重度脑损伤中的正中神经体感诱发电位:皮质电位的初始丧失是否排除恢复的可能?
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2014 Aug;123:25-33. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2014.05.004. Epub 2014 May 14.
10
How reliable is the predictive value of SEP (somatosensory evoked potentials) patterns in severe brain damage with special regard to the bilateral loss of cortical responses?在严重脑损伤中,体感诱发电位(SEP)模式的预测价值有多可靠,尤其是在双侧皮质反应丧失方面?
Intensive Care Med. 1997 Mar;23(3):301-8. doi: 10.1007/s001340050332.

引用本文的文献

1
Concussion As a Multi-Scale Complex System: An Interdisciplinary Synthesis of Current Knowledge.作为多尺度复杂系统的脑震荡:当前知识的跨学科综合
Front Neurol. 2017 Sep 28;8:513. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2017.00513. eCollection 2017.
2
Noninvasive Neuromonitoring: Current Utility in Subarachnoid Hemorrhage, Traumatic Brain Injury, and Stroke.非侵入性神经监测:目前在蛛网膜下腔出血、创伤性脑损伤和中风中的应用
Neurocrit Care. 2017 Aug;27(1):122-140. doi: 10.1007/s12028-016-0361-8.
3
Disruption of Network Synchrony and Cognitive Dysfunction After Traumatic Brain Injury.
创伤性脑损伤后网络同步性破坏与认知功能障碍
Front Syst Neurosci. 2016 May 17;10:43. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2016.00043. eCollection 2016.
4
Middle latency auditory-evoked potential index monitoring of cerebral function to predict functional outcome after emergency craniotomy in patients with brain damage.脑损伤患者急诊开颅术后脑功能的中潜伏期听觉诱发电位指数监测以预测功能转归
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2015 Oct 20;23:80. doi: 10.1186/s13049-015-0161-8.