• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Negotiating the 'grey area between normal social drinking and being a smelly tramp': a qualitative study of people searching for help online to reduce their drinking.在正常社交饮酒与成为一个浑身散发臭味的流浪汉之间的“灰色地带”进行协商:一项对在网上寻求帮助以减少饮酒的人群的定性研究。
Health Expect. 2015 Dec;18(6):2011-20. doi: 10.1111/hex.12351. Epub 2015 Feb 12.
2
Does providing a brief internet intervention for hazardous alcohol use to people seeking online help for depression reduce both alcohol use and depression symptoms among participants with these co-occurring disorders? Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.为有抑郁问题并寻求在线帮助的人提供简短的针对有害饮酒行为的网络干预措施,能否减轻同时患有这两种疾病的参与者的饮酒量和抑郁症状?一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2018 Jul 19;8(7):e022412. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022412.
3
Validation of the AUDIT-C in adults seeking help with their drinking online.AUDIT-C在寻求在线饮酒帮助的成年人中的验证。
Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2017 Jan 4;12(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s13722-016-0066-5.
4
Development of a psychologically enhanced interactive online intervention for hazardous drinking.一种针对危险饮酒的心理强化交互式在线干预措施的开发。
Alcohol Alcohol. 2008 Nov-Dec;43(6):669-74. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agn066. Epub 2008 Aug 7.
5
A qualitative study of online mental health information seeking behaviour by those with psychosis.一项关于精神病患者在线寻求心理健康信息行为的定性研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2016 Jul 11;16:232. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-0952-0.
6
Randomized controlled trial of a minimal versus extended Internet-based intervention for problem drinkers: study protocol.针对问题饮酒者的基于互联网的最小干预与扩展干预的随机对照试验:研究方案。
BMC Public Health. 2015 Jan 21;15:21. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1347-8.
7
The DYD-RCT protocol: an on-line randomised controlled trial of an interactive computer-based intervention compared with a standard information website to reduce alcohol consumption among hazardous drinkers.DYD-RCT方案:一项在线随机对照试验,比较基于计算机的交互式干预与标准信息网站对减少危险饮酒者酒精摄入量的效果。
BMC Public Health. 2007 Oct 26;7:306. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-7-306.
8
Qualitative process study of community pharmacist brief alcohol intervention effectiveness trial: Can research participation effects explain a null finding?社区药剂师简短酒精干预效果试验的定性过程研究:研究参与效应能否解释无显著结果?
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2016 Apr 1;161:36-41. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.01.023. Epub 2016 Feb 2.
9
Executive Functions and Motivation as Moderators of the Relationship Between Automatic Associations and Alcohol Use in Problem Drinkers Seeking Online Help.执行功能和动机作为寻求在线帮助的问题饮酒者自动联想与酒精使用之间关系的调节因素。
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2015 Sep;39(9):1788-96. doi: 10.1111/acer.12822. Epub 2015 Aug 6.
10
'Someone like me': User experiences of the discussion forums of non-12-step alcohol online support groups, June 2019.“像我这样的人”:非 12 步酒精在线支持小组讨论论坛的用户体验,2019 年 6 月。
Addict Behav. 2019 Nov;98:106028. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2019.106028. Epub 2019 Jun 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Motivation, self-efficacy, and identity-double-edged swords for relapse prevention in patients with alcohol related cirrhosis.动机、自我效能感和身份认同——酒精性肝硬化患者预防复发的双刃剑。
Alcohol Alcohol. 2025 May 14;60(4). doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agaf027.
2
Key Terms and Concepts in Alcohol Use and Problems: A Critical Evaluation.酒精使用与问题中的关键术语和概念:批判性评估
Subst Use. 2025 Mar 12;19:29768357241312555. doi: 10.1177/29768357241312555. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
3
Problem Recognition as A Discrete Concept for Change Processes in Problematic Alcohol Use.将问题识别作为问题性酒精使用变化过程的一个离散概念。
Curr Addict Rep. 2025;12(1):23. doi: 10.1007/s40429-025-00634-x. Epub 2025 Feb 19.
4
Telehealth interventions for alcohol use disorder: A systematic review.酒精使用障碍的远程医疗干预措施:一项系统综述。
Liver Res. 2022 Aug 31;6(3):146-154. doi: 10.1016/j.livres.2022.08.004. eCollection 2022 Sep.
5
Is internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy for alcohol use disorder equally effective for men and women? Implications of a secondary analysis of a clinical trial.基于互联网的酒精使用障碍认知行为疗法对男性和女性的效果是否相同?一项临床试验二次分析的启示。
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Dec 20;15:1486278. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1486278. eCollection 2024.
6
Exploring the relationship between proactive e-alcohol therapy and symptoms of anxiety or/and depression: Post-hoc analyses from a randomized controlled trial.探索主动式电子酒精疗法与焦虑或/和抑郁症状之间的关系:一项随机对照试验的事后分析。
Addict Behav Rep. 2024 Dec 5;21:100576. doi: 10.1016/j.abrep.2024.100576. eCollection 2025 Jun.
7
Patient Perspectives on Blended Internet-Based and Face-to-Face Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Alcohol Use Disorder: Qualitative Study.患者对基于互联网的混合式与面对面认知行为疗法治疗酒精使用障碍的看法:定性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Oct 23;26:e47083. doi: 10.2196/47083.
8
Service-level barriers to and facilitators of accessibility to treatment for problematic alcohol use: a scoping review.服务层面上,阻碍和促进有问题的酒精使用治疗可及性的因素:范围综述。
Front Public Health. 2023 Dec 1;11:1296239. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1296239. eCollection 2023.
9
(Mis)understanding alcohol use disorder: Making the case for a public health first approach.(对)酒精使用障碍的误解:倡导公共卫生优先方法。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2023 Dec 1;253:111019. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2023.111019. Epub 2023 Nov 4.
10
Problematic substance use among patients in a Swedish outpatient psychiatry setting: staff and manager perceptions of digital options for increased intervention access.瑞典门诊精神病学环境中患者的药物滥用问题:工作人员和管理人员对增加干预途径的数字选择的看法。
Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2023 Oct 24;18(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s13722-023-00421-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of two internet-based interventions for problem drinkers: randomized controlled trial.两种针对问题饮酒者的基于互联网干预措施的比较:随机对照试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2012 Aug 1;14(4):e107. doi: 10.2196/jmir.2090.
2
The effectiveness of interventions for reducing stigma related to substance use disorders: a systematic review.干预措施减少与物质使用障碍相关的污名的有效性:系统评价。
Addiction. 2012 Jan;107(1):39-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03601.x. Epub 2011 Oct 12.
3
Effectiveness of E-self-help interventions for curbing adult problem drinking: a meta-analysis.电子自助干预对遏制成年人问题饮酒的有效性:一项荟萃分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2011 Jun 30;13(2):e42. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1691.
4
On-line randomized controlled trial of an internet based psychologically enhanced intervention for people with hazardous alcohol consumption.在线随机对照试验,研究基于互联网的心理强化干预对有危险饮酒行为者的效果。
PLoS One. 2011 Mar 9;6(3):e14740. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0014740.
5
The stigma of alcohol dependence compared with other mental disorders: a review of population studies.酒精依赖的污名著其他精神障碍:人群研究综述。
Alcohol Alcohol. 2011 Mar-Apr;46(2):105-12. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agq089. Epub 2010 Dec 18.
6
Online alcohol interventions: a systematic review.在线酒精干预:一项系统综述。
J Med Internet Res. 2010 Dec 19;12(5):e62. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1479.
7
Can stand-alone computer-based interventions reduce alcohol consumption? A systematic review.能否通过独立的基于计算机的干预措施来减少饮酒量?系统评价。
Addiction. 2011 Feb;106(2):267-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.03214.x. Epub 2010 Nov 18.
8
Stigma and treatment for alcohol disorders in the United States.美国的酒精障碍污名化和治疗。
Am J Epidemiol. 2010 Dec 15;172(12):1364-72. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwq304. Epub 2010 Nov 2.
9
Computer-delivered interventions for alcohol and tobacco use: a meta-analysis.计算机干预在酒精和烟草使用方面的效果:一项荟萃分析。
Addiction. 2010 Aug;105(8):1381-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.02975.x. Epub 2010 May 28.
10
Computer-delivered interventions to reduce college student drinking: a meta-analysis.计算机干预措施减少大学生饮酒:一项荟萃分析。
Addiction. 2009 Nov;104(11):1807-19. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02691.x. Epub 2009 Sep 10.

在正常社交饮酒与成为一个浑身散发臭味的流浪汉之间的“灰色地带”进行协商:一项对在网上寻求帮助以减少饮酒的人群的定性研究。

Negotiating the 'grey area between normal social drinking and being a smelly tramp': a qualitative study of people searching for help online to reduce their drinking.

作者信息

Khadjesari Zarnie, Stevenson Fiona, Godfrey Christine, Murray Elizabeth

机构信息

e-Health Unit, UCL Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK.

Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2015 Dec;18(6):2011-20. doi: 10.1111/hex.12351. Epub 2015 Feb 12.

DOI:10.1111/hex.12351
PMID:25676536
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5016787/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND AIMS

Delivering brief interventions for hazardous and harmful drinking on the Internet may broaden the availability of services and overcome some barriers to accessing help in person. The Down Your Drink (DYD) website, an extended brief intervention, attracted a large number of people looking to reduce their drinking. The aim was to explore the experiences of this e-help seeking population.

METHOD

Semi-structured interviews were conducted with participants in the DYD trial - an online trial of the effectiveness of DYD compared with an information-only website. Interviewees were asked how they came across the DYD website. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data were analysed by a multidisciplinary team using detailed thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Eighteen participants were interviewed. Most interviewees perceived their drinking to be a problem, which led them to search the Internet and register for the DYD trial in order to gain access to an intervention to help them reduce their drinking. The type of help required varied from information on the harms of drinking to help with a recognized problem. The privacy of the Internet was perceived as important when searching for help with drinking, as this avoids the stigma and embarrassment associated with help seeking in person. Almost all interviewees perceived a lack of services both online and offline for people wanting to moderate their drinking.

CONCLUSION

There is a perceived gap in services for hazardous and harmful drinkers wanting to reduce their drinking which could be addressed using online interventions.

摘要

引言与目标

在互联网上提供针对危险及有害饮酒行为的简短干预措施,可能会扩大服务的可及性,并克服一些亲自寻求帮助的障碍。“减少饮酒”(Down Your Drink,DYD)网站是一种扩展的简短干预措施,吸引了大量希望减少饮酒量的人群。本研究旨在探索这群通过电子方式寻求帮助的人群的经历。

方法

对参与DYD试验的参与者进行了半结构化访谈,该试验是一项在线试验,将DYD的有效性与仅提供信息的网站进行比较。受访者被问及他们是如何找到DYD网站的。访谈进行了录音,并逐字转录。一个多学科团队使用详细的主题分析方法对数据进行了分析。

结果

共访谈了18名参与者。大多数受访者认为自己的饮酒行为存在问题,这促使他们在互联网上搜索并注册参加DYD试验,以便获得帮助他们减少饮酒的干预措施。所需的帮助类型各不相同,从饮酒危害的信息到解决已确认问题的帮助。在寻求饮酒问题的帮助时,互联网的隐私性被认为很重要,因为这避免了亲自寻求帮助所带来的耻辱感和尴尬。几乎所有受访者都认为,对于想要适度饮酒的人来说,线上和线下的服务都不足。

结论

对于希望减少饮酒量的危险及有害饮酒者,在服务方面存在明显差距,可通过在线干预措施加以解决。