Kalter Joeri, Buffart Laurien M, Korstjens Irene, van Weert Ellen, Brug Johannes, Verdonck-de Leeuw Irma M, Mesters Ilse, van den Borne Bart, Hoekstra-Weebers Josette E H M, Ros Wynand J G, May Anne M
EMGO+ Institute, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VU University Medical Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Support Care Cancer. 2015 Sep;23(9):2623-31. doi: 10.1007/s00520-015-2622-z. Epub 2015 Feb 14.
This study explored demographic, clinical, and psychological moderators of the effect of a group-based physical exercise intervention on global quality of life (QoL) among cancer survivors who completed treatment.
Cancer survivors were assigned to a 12-week physical exercise (n = 147) or a wait-list control group (n = 62). The main outcome measure was global QoL, assessed with the EORTC QLQ-C30 at baseline and 12 weeks later. Potential moderators were age, gender, education level, marital status, employment status, type of treatment, time since treatment, the presence of comorbidities, fatigue, general self-efficacy, depression, and anxiety. Linear regression analyses were used to test effect modification of the intervention by each moderator variable using interaction tests (p ≤ 0.10).
The physical exercise intervention effect on global QoL was larger for cancer survivors who received radiotherapy (β = 10.3, 95 % confidence interval (CI) = 4.4; 16.2) than for cancer survivors who did not receive radiotherapy (β = 1.8, 95 % CI = -5.9; 9.5, p interaction = 0.10), larger for cancer survivors who received a combination of chemoradiotherapy (β = 13.0, 95 % CI = 6.0; 20.1) than for those who did not receive this combination of treatments (β = 2.5, 95 % CI = -3.7; 8.7, p interaction = 0.02), and larger for cancer survivors with higher baseline levels of fatigue (β = 12.6, 95 % CI = 5.7; 19.6) than for those with lower levels (β = 2.4, 95 % CI = -3.9; 8.7, p interaction = 0.03). No other moderating effects were found.
This study suggests that cancer treatment modality and baseline fatigue levels moderate the effect of a physical exercise program on cancer survivors'global QoL.
本研究探讨了人口统计学、临床和心理因素对已完成治疗的癌症幸存者进行的基于小组的体育锻炼干预对总体生活质量(QoL)影响的调节作用。
将癌症幸存者分为12周体育锻炼组(n = 147)或等待名单对照组(n = 62)。主要结局指标为总体生活质量,在基线和12周后用欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织核心生活质量问卷(EORTC QLQ-C30)进行评估。潜在的调节因素包括年龄、性别、教育水平、婚姻状况、就业状况、治疗类型、治疗后时间、合并症的存在、疲劳、一般自我效能感、抑郁和焦虑。使用线性回归分析通过交互检验(p≤0.10)来检验每个调节变量对干预效果的修正作用。
接受放疗的癌症幸存者(β = 10.3,95%置信区间(CI)= 4.4;16.2),体育锻炼干预对总体生活质量的影响大于未接受放疗的癌症幸存者(β = 1.8,95% CI = -5.9;9.5,p交互作用 = 0.10);接受放化疗联合治疗的癌症幸存者(β = 13.0,95% CI = 6.0;20.1),其干预效果大于未接受这种联合治疗的幸存者(β = 2.5,95% CI = -3.7;8.7,p交互作用 = 0.02);基线疲劳水平较高的癌症幸存者(β = 12.6,95% CI = 5.7;19.6),其干预效果大于基线疲劳水平较低的幸存者(β = 2.4,95% CI = -3.9;8.7,p交互作用 = 0.03)。未发现其他调节作用。
本研究表明,癌症治疗方式和基线疲劳水平调节了体育锻炼计划对癌症幸存者总体生活质量的影响。