• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

家庭暴力的测量——英格兰和威尔士犯罪调查的重新开展

The Measurement of Domestic Abuse - Redeveloping the Crime Survey for England and Wales.

作者信息

Hester Marianne, Walker Sarah-Jane, Myhill Andy

机构信息

University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.

College of Policing, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Fam Violence. 2023 Feb 15:1-15. doi: 10.1007/s10896-023-00507-9.

DOI:10.1007/s10896-023-00507-9
PMID:36817846
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9928589/
Abstract

PURPOSE

In 2020 the England and Wales Office for National Statistics commissioned the research reported here to review the current questions on domestic abuse in the Crime Survey for England and Wales (CSEW) and to establish how better data for policy and practice might be produced. The CSEW is a representative population survey that since the early 2000s has provided ongoing measurement of domestic abuse via a dedicated domestic abuse module, with regular publication of headline prevalence and other descriptive data. At the same time the measurement of domestic violence in the CSEW has also been the subject of ongoing debate and critique, in particular whether it is appropriate to use catch-all prevalence measures in the context of policy, practice and commissioning of services.

METHOD

The research included analysis of CSEW user survey data (N = 39), focus group and individual interviews with male and female victims/survivors (N = 11), consultation with core stakeholders (N = 18), and consideration of international surveys and recent legislation.

RESULTS

Current CSEW questions do not capture domestic abuse accurately or reflect lived experience, coercive control needs to be seen at the core of domestic abuse, and while physical assault is an important part of measuring domestic abuse establishing frequency through counting events is probably impossible.

CONCLUSION

A fundamental rethink of the current CSEW self-completion module is required, with a wider set of questions about domestic abuse and impact. A revised module should identify and provide estimation of prevalence for different 'abuse profiles' that would complement improved headline measures and better inform policy and practice.

摘要

目的

2020年,英格兰和威尔士国家统计局委托开展此处报告的研究,以审查英格兰和威尔士犯罪调查(CSEW)中当前关于家庭虐待的问题,并确定如何能产生更有利于政策制定和实践的数据。CSEW是一项具有代表性的人口调查,自21世纪初以来,通过一个专门的家庭虐待模块持续对家庭虐待进行测量,并定期公布总体患病率及其他描述性数据。与此同时,CSEW中家庭暴力的测量也一直是持续辩论和批评的主题,特别是在政策、实践和服务委托的背景下,使用笼统的患病率测量方法是否合适。

方法

该研究包括对CSEW用户调查数据(N = 39)的分析、对男性和女性受害者/幸存者的焦点小组和个人访谈(N = 11)、与核心利益相关者的磋商(N = 18),以及对国际调查和近期立法的考量。

结果

CSEW目前的问题无法准确捕捉家庭虐待情况或反映实际经历,强制控制应被视为家庭虐待的核心,虽然身体攻击是衡量家庭虐待的重要部分,但通过计算事件来确定频率可能是不可能的。

结论

需要对CSEW目前的自填式模块进行根本性反思,设置一系列更广泛的关于家庭虐待及其影响的问题。修订后的模块应识别并提供不同“虐待类型”的患病率估计,这将补充改进后的总体测量方法,并为政策和实践提供更好的信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d08/9928589/5bbbb6d9f712/10896_2023_507_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d08/9928589/5bbbb6d9f712/10896_2023_507_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d08/9928589/5bbbb6d9f712/10896_2023_507_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The Measurement of Domestic Abuse - Redeveloping the Crime Survey for England and Wales.家庭暴力的测量——英格兰和威尔士犯罪调查的重新开展
J Fam Violence. 2023 Feb 15:1-15. doi: 10.1007/s10896-023-00507-9.
2
Trends in community violence in England and Wales 2005-2009.2005 - 2009年英格兰和威尔士社区暴力趋势
Injury. 2014 Mar;45(3):592-8. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2013.06.020. Epub 2013 Jul 16.
3
Risk of work-related violence in England and Wales.英格兰和威尔士的工作场所暴力风险。
Occup Med (Lond). 2022 Jan 13;72(1):25-27. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqab145.
4
"Not an Either/or Situation": The Minimization of Violence Against Women In United Kingdom "Domestic Abuse" Policy.“非此即彼”局面的突破:英国“家暴”政策中对女性暴力侵害最小化。
Violence Against Women. 2021 Sep;27(11):1823-1839. doi: 10.1177/1077801220927079. Epub 2020 Jun 22.
5
Violence against people with disability in England and Wales: findings from a national cross-sectional survey.英格兰和威尔士的残疾人暴力行为:全国横断面调查的结果。
PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e55952. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0055952. Epub 2013 Feb 20.
6
Prevalence and Social Inequality in Experiences of Domestic Abuse Among Mothers of Young Children: A Study Using National Survey Data from Scotland.幼儿期母亲遭受家庭暴力经历的流行状况及社会不平等:基于苏格兰全国调查数据的研究
J Interpers Violence. 2022 Jun;37(11-12):NP9811-NP9838. doi: 10.1177/0886260520980392. Epub 2021 Jan 8.
7
Understanding management and support for domestic violence and abuse within emergency departments: A systematic literature review from 2000-2015.了解急诊科中家庭暴力和虐待的管理和支持:2000-2015 年的系统文献回顾。
J Clin Nurs. 2017 Dec;26(23-24):4013-4027. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13849. Epub 2017 Sep 29.
8
Testing the validity of national drug surveys: comparison between a general population cohort and household surveys.检验全国药物调查的有效性:一般人群队列与家庭调查的比较。
Addiction. 2021 Aug;116(8):2076-2083. doi: 10.1111/add.15371. Epub 2021 Jan 17.
9
The "battering syndrome": prevalence and clinical characteristics of domestic violence in primary care internal medicine practices.“殴打综合征”:基层内科医疗实践中家庭暴力的患病率及临床特征
Ann Intern Med. 1995 Nov 15;123(10):737-46. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-123-10-199511150-00001.
10
UK survey of non-medical use of prescription drugs (NMURx) as a valuable source of general population illicit drug use data.英国对处方药物的非医疗用途(NMURx)的调查是一般人群非法药物使用数据的宝贵来源。
Postgrad Med J. 2018 Nov;94(1117):627-633. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2018-135798.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of domestic abuse on suicide.家庭虐待对自杀的影响。
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2025 Jul 3;55:101376. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2025.101376. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
The impact of parental intimate partner violence and abuse (IPVA) on young adult relationships: a UK general population cohort study.父母亲密伴侣暴力与虐待(IPVA)对青年成人恋爱关系的影响:一项英国普通人群队列研究。
Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2025 May 1;53:101278. doi: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2025.101278. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Screening for coercive control with refugee women accessing settlement services.

本文引用的文献

1
Honor-Based Abuse in England and Wales: Who Does What to Whom?英国和威尔士的基于荣誉的虐待:谁对谁做了什么?
Violence Against Women. 2021 Aug;27(10):1774-1795. doi: 10.1177/1077801220952168. Epub 2020 Aug 31.
2
Coercive Control: Update and Review.强制控制:更新与综述
Violence Against Women. 2019 Jan;25(1):81-104. doi: 10.1177/1077801218816191.
3
Coercive Control and Its Impact on Intimate Partner Violence Through the Lens of an EU-Wide Survey on Violence Against Women.从一项欧盟范围内的暴力侵害妇女行为调查看强制性控制及其对亲密伴侣暴力的影响。
对使用定居服务的难民妇女进行强制性控制筛查。
BMC Public Health. 2025 May 8;25(1):1701. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22886-y.
4
Changes in the prevalence of forcible rape, physical violence, and physical partner violence among men and women in Norway: a population-based repeated cross-sectional study in 2013 and 2022.挪威男性和女性中强迫性强奸、身体暴力及亲密伴侣身体暴力患病率的变化:一项基于2013年和2022年人群的重复横断面研究
BMC Public Health. 2025 Apr 25;25(1):1541. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22763-8.
J Interpers Violence. 2017 Jun;32(12):1792-1820. doi: 10.1177/0886260517698950.
4
Toward a Standard Approach to Operationalizing Coercive Control and Classifying Violence Types.迈向实施强制性控制和暴力类型分类的标准方法。
J Marriage Fam. 2015 Aug;77(4):833-843. doi: 10.1111/jomf.12201.
5
Measuring coercive control: what can we learn from national population surveys?衡量强制性控制:我们能从全国人口调查中学到什么?
Violence Against Women. 2015 Mar;21(3):355-75. doi: 10.1177/1077801214568032.
6
Self-reported exposure to intimate partner violence among women and men in Sweden: results from a population-based survey.瑞典女性和男性自述的亲密伴侣暴力暴露情况:一项基于人群的调查结果。
BMC Public Health. 2013 Sep 13;13:845. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-845.
7
Women with disabilities' experience with physical and sexual abuse: review of the literature and implications for the field.残疾女性遭受身体和性虐待的经历:文献综述及对该领域的启示。
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2012 Jan;13(1):15-29. doi: 10.1177/1524838011426014. Epub 2011 Nov 8.
8
Living in the world of the domestic violence perpetrator: negotiating the unreality of coercive control.生活在家庭暴力施害者的世界中:协商强制性控制的不真实性。
Violence Against Women. 2010 Dec;16(12):1412-23. doi: 10.1177/1077801210389162.