• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基本福利套餐:构成与规则例外。一个案例研究。

The basic benefit package: composition and exceptions to the rules. A case study.

作者信息

Kroneman Madelon, de Jong Judith D

机构信息

NIVEL (Netherlands Institute of Health Services Research), PO box 1568, 3500 BN Utrecht, The Netherlands.

NIVEL (Netherlands Institute of Health Services Research), PO box 1568, 3500 BN Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Health Policy. 2015 Mar;119(3):245-51. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2015.01.013. Epub 2015 Jan 28.

DOI:10.1016/j.healthpol.2015.01.013
PMID:25680945
Abstract

With the introduction of the Health Insurance Act in 2006 in the Netherlands, the basic package of the former sickness funds became valid for all citizens. The basic benefit package has been subject to change, responding to increasing health care expenditures, medical innovations and the economic crisis. In this paper we address the decision criteria used to assess the package annually since 2006 and describe some developments that do not follow the criteria, leading to a yo-yo effect. We discuss the formation of the decision for in- or exclusion and why some treatments seem to follow an, at first sight, arbitrary in- and exclusion pathway. We first describe the official way of establishing the basic benefit package and than will describe why some treatments follow a deviated path. We conclude that political pressure and pressure from interest groups may lead to inclusion or postponement of exclusion. Reform of the organization of certain forms of health care (in our example mental care) may lead to seemingly inconsequent changes. The yo-yo effect of some treatments or pharmaceuticals may have negative effects on health care providers, insurers and patients. The seemingly well defined criteria available for defining the basic package appear to be broadly interpretable and other influences may determine the final decision of inclusion or exclusion.

摘要

随着2006年荷兰《健康保险法》的出台,以前疾病基金的基本套餐对所有公民都有效。基本福利套餐一直在变化,以应对不断增加的医疗保健支出、医学创新和经济危机。在本文中,我们阐述了自2006年以来用于每年评估该套餐的决策标准,并描述了一些不符合该标准的发展情况,从而导致了一种摇摆效应。我们讨论了纳入或排除决策的形成过程,以及为什么有些治疗方法似乎遵循一种乍一看随意的纳入和排除路径。我们首先描述确定基本福利套餐的官方方式,然后将描述为什么有些治疗方法会遵循偏离的路径。我们得出结论,政治压力和利益集团的压力可能导致纳入或推迟排除。某些形式的医疗保健(在我们的例子中是心理保健)组织的改革可能会导致看似不合理的变化。某些治疗方法或药品的摇摆效应可能会对医疗保健提供者、保险公司和患者产生负面影响。用于定义基本套餐的看似明确的标准似乎可以有广泛的解释,其他影响因素可能会决定最终的纳入或排除决策。

相似文献

1
The basic benefit package: composition and exceptions to the rules. A case study.基本福利套餐:构成与规则例外。一个案例研究。
Health Policy. 2015 Mar;119(3):245-51. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2015.01.013. Epub 2015 Jan 28.
2
The Netherlands: health system review.荷兰:卫生系统综述。
Health Syst Transit. 2010;12(1):v-xxvii, 1-228.
3
Problematic notions in Dutch health care package decisions.荷兰医疗保健套餐决策中的问题观念。
Health Care Anal. 2003 Dec;11(4):287-94. doi: 10.1023/B:HCAN.0000010057.43321.b2.
4
Health care reform: managed competition and beyond.医疗保健改革:管理式竞争及其他。
EBRI Issue Brief. 1993 Mar(135):1-33.
5
[Health Council recommendation on the 'Contours of the basic package'].[卫生委员会关于“基本医疗包轮廓”的建议]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2004 Jan 10;148(2):97-101.
6
An experiment with regulated competition and individual mandates for universal health care: the new Dutch health insurance system.一项关于全民医保的规范竞争与个人强制参保的实验:荷兰新医保体系
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2008 Dec;33(6):1031-55. doi: 10.1215/03616878-2008-033.
7
International involvement and national health governance: the basic benefit package in Tajikistan.国际参与和国家卫生治理:塔吉克斯坦的基本一揽子福利。
Soc Sci Med. 2010 Jun;70(12):1928-1932. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.02.029. Epub 2010 Mar 16.
8
[The definition of benefits: from the benefit package to the supply of services].福利的定义:从福利套餐到服务供应
Gac Sanit. 1995 Mar-Apr;9(47):126-32. doi: 10.1016/s0213-9111(95)71226-2.
9
Risk adjustment and risk selection in Europe: 6 years later.欧洲的风险调整与风险选择:6年后
Health Policy. 2007 Oct;83(2-3):162-79. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2006.12.004. Epub 2007 Jan 31.
10
Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.德国药品效益评估的程序和方法。
Eur J Health Econ. 2008 Nov;9 Suppl 1:5-29. doi: 10.1007/s10198-008-0122-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Legal and Regulatory Approaches to Rehabilitation Planning: A Concise Overview of Current Laws and Policies Addressing Access to Rehabilitation in Five European Countries.康复规划的法律和监管方法:五个欧洲国家中当前涉及康复机会的法律和政策的简要概述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 18;17(12):4363. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17124363.
2
Case-studies of displacement effects in Dutch hospital care.荷兰医院护理中位移效应的案例研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Mar 30;20(1):263. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05086-9.
3
A paradoxical situation in regressivity or progressivity of out of pocket payment for health care: which one is a matter of the health policy maker's decision to intervention?
医疗保健自付费用的递减性或递增性中存在的一种矛盾情况:哪一种是卫生政策制定者决定干预的问题?
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2019 Dec 17;17:28. doi: 10.1186/s12962-019-0197-0. eCollection 2019.
4
Scoping literature review on the basic health benefit package and its determinant criteria.基本卫生福利包及其决定标准的范围文献综述。
Global Health. 2018 Mar 2;14(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12992-018-0345-x.