Amate J M, Lopez-Cuadrado T, Almendro N, Bouza C, Saz-Parkinson Z, Rivas-Ruiz R, Gonzalez-Canudas J
Institute of Health "Carlos III", Healthcare Technologies Assessment Agency, Madrid, Spain.
Int J Clin Pract. 2015 Mar;69(3):292-304. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.12605. Epub 2015 Feb 16.
Our review analyses the studies that have specifically compared the association iDPP4/metformin with glimepiride/metformin, both in second line pharmacotherapy of type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2).
Systematic literature review with a meta-analysis of clinical trials comparing glimepiride with any iDPP4, both used together with metformin as a second line treatment of DM2. The effectiveness variables used were as follows: %HbA1c variation, fasting plasma glucose variation, patients achieving the therapeutic objective of HbA1c <7%, treatment dropouts due to lack of effectiveness and rescue treatments needed. The safety variables included were as follows: weight variation at the end of treatment; presentation of any type of adverse event; presentation of serious adverse events; patients who experienced any type of hypoglycaemia; patients who experienced severe hypoglycaemia; treatments suspended due to adverse effects; and deaths for any reason.
Four studies met the inclusion criteria. The group treated with glimepiride showed better results in all effectiveness variables. Regarding safety variables, the main differences observed were in the greater number of cases with hypoglycaemia in the group treated with glimepiride, and the serious adverse events or treatment discontinuations due to these which occurred in slightly over 2% more cases in this group compared to the iDPP4 group. The remaining adverse events, including mortality, did not show any differences between both groups. The variation in the weight difference between groups (2.1 kg) is not considered clinically relevant.
A greater effectiveness is seen in the glimepiride/metformin association, which should not be diminished by slight differences in adverse effects, with absence of severe hypoglycaemia in over 98% of patients under treatment. The association of glimepiride/metformin, both due to cost as well as effectiveness and safety, may be the preferential treatment for most DM2 patients, and it offers a potential advantage in refractory hyperglycemic populations, tolerant to treatment.
我们的综述分析了在2型糖尿病(DM2)二线药物治疗中,专门比较iDPP4/二甲双胍与格列美脲/二甲双胍联合用药的相关研究。
进行系统的文献综述,并对比较格列美脲与任何一种iDPP4的临床试验进行荟萃分析,二者均与二甲双胍联合使用作为DM2的二线治疗。所使用的有效性变量如下:糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)变化百分比、空腹血糖变化、达到HbA1c<7%治疗目标的患者、因疗效不佳导致的治疗中断以及所需的挽救治疗。所纳入的安全性变量如下:治疗结束时的体重变化;任何类型不良事件的发生情况;严重不良事件的发生情况;发生任何类型低血糖的患者;发生严重低血糖的患者;因不良反应而停药的情况;以及任何原因导致的死亡。
四项研究符合纳入标准。接受格列美脲治疗的组在所有有效性变量方面均显示出更好的结果。关于安全性变量,观察到的主要差异在于,格列美脲治疗组发生低血糖的病例数更多,且与iDPP4组相比,该组因低血糖导致的严重不良事件或治疗中断的病例数略多2%以上。其余不良事件,包括死亡率,两组之间未显示出任何差异。组间体重差异的变化(2.1千克)在临床上不被认为具有相关性。
格列美脲/二甲双胍联合用药显示出更高的有效性,其不良反应的轻微差异不应削弱这一优势,超过98%的接受治疗患者未发生严重低血糖。由于成本、有效性和安全性等因素,格列美脲/二甲双胍联合用药可能是大多数DM2患者的首选治疗方法,并且在难治性高血糖人群以及对治疗耐受的人群中具有潜在优势。