• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

学习判断与记忆之间的关联与分离:字体大小效应的元分析

Association and dissociation between judgments of learning and memory: A Meta-analysis of the font size effect.

作者信息

Chang Minyu, Brainerd Charles J

机构信息

Department of Psychology and Human Neuroscience Institute, Cornell University, G331 MVR Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA.

出版信息

Metacogn Learn. 2022;17(2):443-476. doi: 10.1007/s11409-021-09287-3. Epub 2022 Feb 28.

DOI:10.1007/s11409-021-09287-3
PMID:35250403
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8883023/
Abstract

UNLABELLED

The font size effect is a metamemory illusion in which larger-font items produce higher judgments of learning (JOLs) but not better memory, relative to smaller-font items. We conducted meta-analyses to determine what is currently known about how font size affects JOLs and memory accuracy. In addition, we implemented both univariate and multivariate meta-regressions to isolate the moderators of JOL effects and memory effects. The results revealed a small-to-moderate effect of font size on JOLs. There was also a small but significant effect of font size on memory. This suggests that JOLs and memory accuracy both increase with font size, rather than being completely dissociated. Moreover, JOL-memory dissociation only occurred when font size ranged between very small and intermediate. Our working explanation is that the memory effects of font size are tied to (dis)fluency, but its JOL effects are not. Some boundary conditions were identified for font size effects on both JOLs and memory. Specifically, larger font sizes only reliably increased both JOLs and memory accuracy (a) when font sizes ranged from intermediate to very large, (b) when study materials were unrelated word lists, (c) when JOLs were solicited immediately after encoding, and (d) when study time was relatively brief.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11409-021-09287-3.

摘要

未标注

字体大小效应是一种元记忆错觉,即相对于较小字体的项目,较大字体的项目会产生更高的学习判断(JOLs),但记忆效果却并不更好。我们进行了元分析,以确定目前关于字体大小如何影响JOLs和记忆准确性的已知情况。此外,我们实施了单变量和多变量元回归,以分离JOL效应和记忆效应的调节因素。结果显示,字体大小对JOLs有小到中等程度的影响。字体大小对记忆也有小但显著的影响。这表明JOLs和记忆准确性都随字体大小而增加,而不是完全分离。此外,JOL-记忆分离仅在字体大小介于非常小和中等之间时发生。我们的初步解释是,字体大小的记忆效应与(不)流畅性相关,但它对JOLs的影响并非如此。我们确定了一些字体大小对JOLs和记忆的影响的边界条件。具体而言,只有在以下情况下,较大的字体大小才会可靠地提高JOLs和记忆准确性:(a)当字体大小从中等变为非常大时;(b)当学习材料是不相关的单词列表时;(c)当编码后立即征求JOLs时;以及(d)当学习时间相对较短时。

补充信息

在线版本包含可在10.1007/s11409-021-09287-3获取的补充材料。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ccd9/8883023/ed2a3b169ec8/11409_2021_9287_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ccd9/8883023/e2e38115c85c/11409_2021_9287_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ccd9/8883023/3174c27dcc5a/11409_2021_9287_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ccd9/8883023/aa4f622c060d/11409_2021_9287_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ccd9/8883023/095c1f1deff0/11409_2021_9287_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ccd9/8883023/5760221adee9/11409_2021_9287_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ccd9/8883023/3c7927abf3d3/11409_2021_9287_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ccd9/8883023/ed2a3b169ec8/11409_2021_9287_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ccd9/8883023/e2e38115c85c/11409_2021_9287_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ccd9/8883023/3174c27dcc5a/11409_2021_9287_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ccd9/8883023/aa4f622c060d/11409_2021_9287_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ccd9/8883023/095c1f1deff0/11409_2021_9287_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ccd9/8883023/5760221adee9/11409_2021_9287_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ccd9/8883023/3c7927abf3d3/11409_2021_9287_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ccd9/8883023/ed2a3b169ec8/11409_2021_9287_Fig7_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Association and dissociation between judgments of learning and memory: A Meta-analysis of the font size effect.学习判断与记忆之间的关联与分离:字体大小效应的元分析
Metacogn Learn. 2022;17(2):443-476. doi: 10.1007/s11409-021-09287-3. Epub 2022 Feb 28.
2
Do delayed judgements of learning reduce metamemory illusions? A meta-analysis.学习的延迟判断会减少元记忆错觉吗?一项元分析。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2018 Jul;71(7):1626-1636. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2017.1343362. Epub 2018 Jan 1.
3
How Much Do Metamemory Beliefs Contribute to the Font-Size Effect in Judgments of Learning?元记忆信念在学习判断中的字号效应中起到了多大作用?
PLoS One. 2015 Nov 10;10(11):e0142351. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0142351. eCollection 2015.
4
Influence of cue word perceptual information on metamemory accuracy in judgement of learning.线索词知觉信息对学习判断中元记忆准确性的影响。
Memory. 2016;24(3):383-98. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2015.1009470. Epub 2015 Feb 16.
5
Metamemory and memory for a wide range of font sizes: What is the contribution of perceptual fluency?元记忆与对多种字体大小的记忆:知觉流畅性有何作用?
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2019 Jan;45(1):97-109. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000571. Epub 2018 Apr 26.
6
Can very small font size enhance memory?非常小的字体能增强记忆力吗?
Mem Cognit. 2018 Aug;46(6):979-993. doi: 10.3758/s13421-018-0816-6.
7
Perceptual contrast reduces the judgments of learning of small-font words and increases the judgments of learning of large-font words compared with the no-contrast conditions.与无对比条件相比,感知对比会降低小字体单词的学习判断,而增加大字体单词的学习判断。
Psych J. 2023 Oct;12(5):670-679. doi: 10.1002/pchj.679. Epub 2023 Sep 8.
8
Do Beliefs About Font Size Affect Retrospective Metamemory Judgments in Addition to Prospective Judgments?除了前瞻性判断外,关于字体大小的信念是否还会影响回顾性元记忆判断?
Exp Psychol. 2022 May;69(3):172-184. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000549. Epub 2022 Aug 17.
9
Reactivity from judgments of learning is not only due to memory forecasting: evidence from associative memory and frequency judgments.学习判断中的反应性不仅源于记忆预测:来自联想记忆和频率判断的证据。
Metacogn Learn. 2022;17(2):589-625. doi: 10.1007/s11409-022-09301-2. Epub 2022 Apr 29.
10
Intensifying the intensity illusion in judgments of learning: Modality and cue combinations.增强学习判断中的强度错觉:模态与线索组合
Mem Cognit. 2019 Apr;47(3):412-419. doi: 10.3758/s13421-018-0875-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Manipulating belief partially remedies the metamemory expectancy illusion in schema-based source monitoring.操纵信念可部分纠正基于图式的源记忆监测中的元记忆预期错觉。
Mem Cognit. 2025 Jul 24. doi: 10.3758/s13421-025-01757-2.
2
Development and usability testing of an integrated geriatric care model (SMART system) to promote integrated home-based geriatric care.一种促进综合居家老年护理的综合老年护理模式(SMART系统)的开发与可用性测试。
BMC Geriatr. 2025 Mar 28;25(1):208. doi: 10.1186/s12877-025-05829-5.
3
Reducing cheap talk? How monetary incentives affect the accuracy of metamemory judgments.

本文引用的文献

1
Do Judgments of Learning Impair Recall When Uninformative Cues Are Salient?当无信息线索显著时,学习判断会影响回忆吗?
J Intell. 2023 Oct 23;11(10):203. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11100203.
2
Perceptual Fluency Affects Judgments of Learning Non-analytically and Analytically Through Beliefs About How Perceptual Fluency Affects Memory.知觉流畅性通过关于知觉流畅性如何影响记忆的信念,非分析性地和分析性地影响学习判断。
Front Psychol. 2020 Oct 2;11:552824. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.552824. eCollection 2020.
3
Effect of impoverished information on multisensory integration in judgments of learning.
减少空谈?金钱激励如何影响元记忆判断的准确性。
Mem Cognit. 2025 Jan 23. doi: 10.3758/s13421-024-01679-5.
4
Responsible remembering: The role of metacognition, forgetting, attention, and retrieval in adaptive memory.适应性记忆中的负责记忆:元认知、遗忘、注意力及提取的作用
Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Feb;32(1):156-175. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02554-9. Epub 2024 Aug 13.
5
The perceived importance of words in large font guides learning and selective memory.大字呈现的单词的感知重要性指导学习和选择性记忆。
Mem Cognit. 2024 Oct;52(7):1463-1476. doi: 10.3758/s13421-024-01555-2. Epub 2024 Apr 19.
6
Do Judgments of Learning Impair Recall When Uninformative Cues Are Salient?当无信息线索显著时,学习判断会影响回忆吗?
J Intell. 2023 Oct 23;11(10):203. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence11100203.
7
Conversational pragmatics: memory reporting strategies in different social contexts.会话语用学:不同社会情境下的记忆报告策略
Front Psychol. 2023 May 25;14:1004524. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1004524. eCollection 2023.
8
The font size effect depends on inter-item relation.字号大小效应取决于项目间关系。
Mem Cognit. 2023 Oct;51(7):1702-1713. doi: 10.3758/s13421-023-01419-1. Epub 2023 Mar 30.
信息匮乏对学习判断中多感觉整合的影响。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2021 Mar;47(3):481-497. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000953. Epub 2020 Oct 8.
4
Pure-list production improves item recognition and sometimes also improves source memory.纯列表产生能提高项目识别能力,有时也能提高来源记忆。
Mem Cognit. 2020 Oct;48(7):1281-1294. doi: 10.3758/s13421-020-01044-2.
5
Reactivity to Measures of Metacognition.对元认知测量的反应性。
Front Psychol. 2019 Dec 6;10:2755. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02755. eCollection 2019.
6
Judgments of Learning in Context: Backgrounds Can Both Reduce and Produce Metamemory Illusions.情境学习判断:背景既可以减少也可以产生元记忆错觉。
Mem Cognit. 2020 May;48(4):581-595. doi: 10.3758/s13421-019-00991-9.
7
Metamemory viewed through the judgment lens.从判断视角审视元记忆。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2019 Jun;197:153-165. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.04.011. Epub 2019 May 31.
8
A history of meta-regression: Technical, conceptual, and practical developments between 1974 and 2018.元回归的历史:1974 年至 2018 年间的技术、概念和实践发展。
Res Synth Methods. 2019 Jun;10(2):161-179. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1338. Epub 2019 Feb 20.
9
Intensifying the intensity illusion in judgments of learning: Modality and cue combinations.增强学习判断中的强度错觉:模态与线索组合
Mem Cognit. 2019 Apr;47(3):412-419. doi: 10.3758/s13421-018-0875-8.
10
Words in larger font are perceived as more important: explaining the belief that font size affects memory.大号字体的单词被视为更重要:解释字体大小影响记忆的这一观点。
Memory. 2019 Apr;27(4):555-560. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2018.1529797. Epub 2018 Oct 7.