反污名项目的效果会随着时间持续存在吗？一项元分析的结果
Do the effects of antistigma programs persist over time? Findings from a meta-analysis.
作者信息
Corrigan Patrick, Michaels Patrick J, Morris Scott
机构信息
The authors are with the Department of Psychology, Lewis College of Human Sciences, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago (e-mail:
出版信息
Psychiatr Serv. 2015 May 1;66(5):543-6. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201400291. Epub 2015 Feb 17.
OBJECTIVES
A previous analysis showed the positive impact of education and contact with persons with lived experience on public stigma toward mental illness, with contact yielding significantly greater effect sizes than education. This study reported a further analysis of those data that examined effects of education and contact at follow-up.
METHODS
The literature (before October 2010) was searched and coded for studies that examined strategies for changing public stigma.
RESULTS
The search found 72 articles, and 19 contained follow-up data. The effect size for overall impact was significantly different from zero for education, but a similar effect size was not significantly different from zero for contact because a small number of contact-intervention studies included follow-up. Effect sizes for attitudinal change were significantly different from zero for education and contact, but the effect size for contact was significantly greater.
CONCLUSIONS
Future research designs need to include strategies for follow-up assessments.
目的
先前的一项分析表明，教育以及与有实际生活经历的人接触对公众对精神疾病的污名化有积极影响，其中接触产生的效应量比教育显著更大。本研究报告了对那些数据的进一步分析，该分析考察了随访时教育和接触的效果。
方法
检索并编码2010年10月之前的文献，查找考察改变公众污名化策略的研究。
结果
检索发现72篇文章，其中19篇包含随访数据。教育对总体影响的效应量显著异于零，但接触的类似效应量不显著异于零，因为少数接触干预研究纳入了随访。教育和接触在态度改变方面的效应量均显著异于零，但接触的效应量显著更大。
结论
未来的研究设计需要纳入随访评估策略。
Zotero 插件