Corrigan Patrick W, Michaels Patrick J, Vega Eduardo, Gause Michael, Larson Jon, Krzyzanowski Richard, Botcheva Luba
Lewis College of Human Sciences, Illinois Institute of Technology.
Mental Health Association of San Francisco.
Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2014 Mar;37(1):62-4. doi: 10.1037/prj0000038. Epub 2014 Jan 13.
Contact-based antistigma programs seemingly have a larger and more sustained impact than educational strategies. Previous qualitative research of advocates with lived experiences yielded 32 key ingredients of contact-based programs comprising 5 categories. This study sought an independent sample's feedback of the 32 ingredients.
One hundred advocates with lived experience of mental health conditions who have led, coordinated, and/or delivered antistigma presentations completed an online survey to rank importance of key ingredients.
Analysis of rank distributions showed most important ingredients in program categories: (a) design: face-to-face presentations, audience discussion; (b) target: specific group identified (e.g., employers), assessment completed with targets to derive stigma change goals relevant to needs; (c) staff: presenters are people with lived experience; (d) message: message includes on the-way-up stories; and (e) evaluation/follow-up: post-presentation follow-up actions discussed with targets.
Future research hopes to yield a fidelity measure for contact-based programs.
基于接触的反污名化项目似乎比教育策略具有更大、更持久的影响。先前对有实际经历的倡导者进行的定性研究得出了基于接触的项目的32个关键要素，包括5个类别。本研究寻求独立样本对这32个要素的反馈。
100名有心理健康状况实际经历、曾领导、协调和/或开展反污名化演讲的倡导者完成了一项在线调查，以对关键要素的重要性进行排序。
对排名分布的分析显示了项目类别中最重要的要素：（a）设计：面对面演讲、受众讨论；（b）目标：确定特定群体（如雇主），与目标群体一起完成评估，以得出与需求相关的污名化改变目标；（c）工作人员：演讲者为有实际经历的人；（d）信息：信息包括成功故事；（e）评估/跟进：与目标群体讨论演讲后的跟进行动。
未来的研究希望得出基于接触的项目的保真度衡量标准。
