Al Rwahnih Maher, Daubert Steve, Golino Deborah, Islas Christina, Rowhani Adib
Department of Plant Pathology, University of California, Davis 95616.
Phytopathology. 2015 Jun;105(6):758-63. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-06-14-0165-R. Epub 2015 May 29.
A bioassay is routinely used to determine the viral phytosanitary status of commercial grapevine propagation material in many countries around the world. That test is based on the symptoms developed in the field by specific indicator host plants that are graft-inoculated from the vines being tested. We compared the bioassay against next-generation sequencing (NGS) analysis of grapevine material. NGS is a laboratory procedure that catalogs the genomic sequences of the viruses and other pathogens extracted as DNA and RNA from infected vines. NGS analysis was found to be superior to the standard bioassay in detection of viruses of agronomic significance, including virus infections at low titers. NGS was also found to be superior to the bioassay in its comprehensiveness, the speed of its analysis, and for the discovery of novel, uncharacterized viruses.
在世界上许多国家,生物测定法通常用于确定商业葡萄繁殖材料的病毒植物检疫状况。该测试基于特定指示寄主植物在田间出现的症状,这些指示寄主植物是从被测葡萄藤上嫁接接种的。我们将生物测定法与葡萄材料的下一代测序(NGS)分析进行了比较。NGS是一种实验室程序,可对从受感染葡萄藤中提取为DNA和RNA的病毒及其他病原体的基因组序列进行编目。结果发现,在检测具有农艺学意义的病毒(包括低滴度病毒感染)方面,NGS分析优于标准生物测定法。在全面性、分析速度以及发现新型未鉴定病毒方面,NGS也优于生物测定法。