• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹部手术后腹直肌切口疝风险分层评分的开发与验证:腹腔内手术中的疝预期发生率(HERNIA项目)

Development and validation of a risk stratification score for ventral incisional hernia after abdominal surgery: hernia expectation rates in intra-abdominal surgery (the HERNIA Project).

作者信息

Goodenough Christopher J, Ko Tien C, Kao Lillian S, Nguyen Mylan T, Holihan Julie L, Alawadi Zeinab, Nguyen Duyen H, Flores Juan R, Arita Nestor T, Roth J Scott, Liang Mike K

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX.

Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX.

出版信息

J Am Coll Surg. 2015 Apr;220(4):405-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.12.027. Epub 2015 Jan 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.12.027
PMID:25690673
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4372474/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Ventral incisional hernias (VIH) develop in up to 20% of patients after abdominal surgery. No widely applicable preoperative risk-assessment tool exists. We aimed to develop and validate a risk-assessment tool to predict VIH after abdominal surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective study of all patients undergoing abdominal surgery was conducted at a single institution from 2008 to 2010. Variables were defined in accordance with the National Surgical Quality Improvement Project, and VIH was determined through clinical and radiographic evaluation. A multivariate Cox proportional hazard model was built from a development cohort (2008 to 2009) to identify predictors of VIH. The HERNIAscore was created by converting the hazards ratios (HR) to points. The predictive accuracy was assessed on the validation cohort (2010) using a receiver operator characteristic curve and calculating the area under the curve (AUC).

RESULTS

Of 625 patients followed for a median of 41 months (range 0.3 to 64 months), 93 (13.9%) developed a VIH. The training cohort (n = 428, VIH = 70, 16.4%) identified 4 independent predictors: laparotomy (HR 4.77, 95% CI 2.61 to 8.70) or hand-assisted laparoscopy (HAL, HR 4.00, 95% CI 2.08 to 7.70), COPD (HR 2.35; 95% CI 1.44 to 3.83), and BMI ≥ 25 kg/m(2) (HR1.74; 95% CI 1.04 to 2.91). Factors that were not predictive included age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, albumin, immunosuppression, previous surgery, and suture material or technique. The predictive score had an AUC = 0.77 (95% CI 0.68 to 0.86) using the validation cohort (n = 197, VIH = 23, 11.6%). Using the HERNIAscore: HERNIAscore = 4(∗)Laparotomy+3(∗)HAL+1(∗)COPD+1(∗) BMI ≥ 25, 3 classes stratified the risk of VIH: class I (0 to 3 points),5.2%; class II (4 to 5 points),19.6%; and class III (6 points), 55.0%.

CONCLUSIONS

The HERNIAscore accurately identifies patients at increased risk for VIH. Although external validation is needed, this provides a starting point to counsel patients and guide clinical decisions. Increasing the use of laparoscopy, weight-loss programs, community smoking prevention programs, and incisional reinforcement may help reduce rates of VIH.

摘要

背景

腹部手术后高达20%的患者会发生腹直肌切口疝(VIH)。目前尚无广泛适用的术前风险评估工具。我们旨在开发并验证一种风险评估工具,以预测腹部手术后的VIH。

研究设计

2008年至2010年在一家机构对所有接受腹部手术的患者进行了一项前瞻性研究。根据国家外科质量改进项目定义变量,并通过临床和影像学评估确定VIH。从一个开发队列(2008年至2009年)构建多变量Cox比例风险模型,以识别VIH的预测因素。通过将风险比(HR)转换为分数来创建HERNIA评分。使用受试者工作特征曲线并计算曲线下面积(AUC),在验证队列(2010年)中评估预测准确性。

结果

在625例患者中,中位随访41个月(范围0.3至64个月),93例(13.9%)发生了VIH。训练队列(n = 428,VIH = 70,16.4%)确定了4个独立预测因素:开腹手术(HR 4.77,95% CI 2.61至8.70)或手辅助腹腔镜手术(HAL,HR 4.00,95% CI 2.08至7.70)、慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD,HR 2.35;95% CI 1.44至3.83)以及体重指数(BMI)≥25 kg/m²(HR 1.74;95% CI 1.04至2.91)。无预测作用的因素包括年龄、性别、美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)评分、白蛋白、免疫抑制、既往手术以及缝合材料或技术。使用验证队列(n = 197,VIH = 23,11.6%)时,预测评分的AUC = 0.77(95% CI 0.68至0.86)。使用HERNIA评分:HERNIA评分 = 4×开腹手术 + 3×HAL + 1×COPD + 1×BMI≥25,3个类别对VIH风险进行了分层:I类(0至3分),5.2%;II类(4至5分),19.6%;III类(6分),55.0%。

结论

HERNIA评分能准确识别VIH风险增加的患者。尽管需要外部验证,但这为向患者提供咨询和指导临床决策提供了一个起点。增加腹腔镜手术的使用、开展减肥项目、社区吸烟预防项目以及切口加强措施可能有助于降低VIH的发生率。

相似文献

1
Development and validation of a risk stratification score for ventral incisional hernia after abdominal surgery: hernia expectation rates in intra-abdominal surgery (the HERNIA Project).腹部手术后腹直肌切口疝风险分层评分的开发与验证:腹腔内手术中的疝预期发生率(HERNIA项目)
J Am Coll Surg. 2015 Apr;220(4):405-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.12.027. Epub 2015 Jan 2.
2
External Validation of the HERNIAscore: An Observational Study.HERNIA评分的外部验证:一项观察性研究。
J Am Coll Surg. 2017 Sep;225(3):428-434. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.05.010. Epub 2017 May 26.
3
Discussion.讨论。
J Am Coll Surg. 2015 Apr;220(4):413-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.01.008.
4
Development and validation of a risk-stratification score for surgical site occurrence and surgical site infection after open ventral hernia repair.开发并验证了一种用于开放式腹疝修补术后手术部位发生和手术部位感染的风险分层评分。
J Am Coll Surg. 2013 Dec;217(6):974-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.08.003. Epub 2013 Sep 17.
5
Early repair of ventral incisional hernia may improve quality of life after surgery for abdominal malignancy: a prospective observational cohort study.早期修复腹侧切口疝可能改善腹部恶性肿瘤手术后的生活质量:一项前瞻性观察队列研究。
Hernia. 2019 Feb;23(1):81-90. doi: 10.1007/s10029-018-1863-4. Epub 2018 Dec 18.
6
Cancer Survivorship: Defining the Incidence of Incisional Hernia After Resection for Intra-Abdominal Malignancy.癌症幸存者:界定腹内恶性肿瘤切除术后切口疝的发病率
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Dec;23(Suppl 5):764-771. doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5546-z. Epub 2016 Oct 14.
7
A multicenter randomized controlled trial evaluating the effect of small stitches on the incidence of incisional hernia in midline incisions.一项评估小缝线对中线切口切口疝发生率影响的多中心随机对照试验。
BMC Surg. 2011 Aug 26;11:20. doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-11-20.
8
Risk of late-onset adhesions and incisional hernia repairs after surgery.手术后迟发性粘连和切口疝修复的风险。
J Am Coll Surg. 2013 Jun;216(6):1159-67, 1167.e1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.01.060. Epub 2013 Apr 23.
9
Prospective clinical trial of factors predicting the early development of incisional hernia after midline laparotomy.前瞻性临床试验:预测中线剖腹术后切口疝早期发生的因素。
J Am Coll Surg. 2010 Feb;210(2):210-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.10.013.
10
Incisional hernia, midline versus low transverse incision: what is the ideal incision for specimen extraction and hand-assisted laparoscopy?切口疝,正中切口与横切口低位相比:哪种切口更适合标本取出和手助腹腔镜手术?
Surg Endosc. 2011 Apr;25(4):1031-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1309-2. Epub 2010 Aug 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Prevention of Postoperative Hernias in Emergency Surgery - PROPHECY Trial.急诊手术中术后疝的预防——PROPHECY试验
J Abdom Wall Surg. 2025 Jul 9;4:14765. doi: 10.3389/jaws.2025.14765. eCollection 2025.
2
Outcomes of ventral hernia repair in patients of severe obesity: An experience from a tertiary care centre.重度肥胖患者腹疝修补术的疗效:来自三级医疗中心的经验。
J Minim Access Surg. 2025 Jul 1;21(3):270-275. doi: 10.4103/jmas.jmas_292_24. Epub 2025 May 9.
3
Postoperative Pain and Incisional Hernia of Specimen Extraction Sites for Minimally Invasive Rectal Cancer Surgery: Comparison of Periumbilical Midline Incision Versus Pfannenstiel Incision.微创直肠癌手术标本取出部位的术后疼痛与切口疝:脐周正中切口与耻骨上横切口的比较
J Clin Med. 2025 Apr 15;14(8):2697. doi: 10.3390/jcm14082697.
4
Short-term outcomes in mesh versus suture-only treatment of burst abdomen: a case-series from a university hospital.补片与单纯缝合治疗腹部爆裂伤的短期结局:来自一家大学医院的病例系列研究
Hernia. 2025 Feb 18;29(1):100. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03279-x.
5
Assessment of the European Hernia Society Classification of Ventral Hernias and Clinical Outcomes.欧洲疝学会腹疝分类与临床结局评估
HCA Healthc J Med. 2024 Dec 1;5(6):649-659. doi: 10.36518/2689-0216.1542. eCollection 2024.
6
Laparoscopic or Robotically Assisted Colectomy with a Pfannenstiel Incision Reduces the Incisional Hernia Incidence.采用耻骨上横切口的腹腔镜或机器人辅助结肠切除术可降低切口疝的发生率。
J Anus Rectum Colon. 2024 Oct 25;8(4):298-304. doi: 10.23922/jarc.2024-019. eCollection 2024.
7
The impact of simultaneous panniculectomy in ventral hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis.同期行腹侧疝修补术对腹茧症的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Hernia. 2024 Dec;28(6):2125-2136. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03149-y. Epub 2024 Sep 6.
8
Weight regain after intragastric balloon for pre-surgical weight loss.用于术前减重的胃内球囊置入后体重反弹。
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2024 Jul 27;16(7):2040-2046. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i7.2040.
9
Occurrence and prevention of incisional hernia following laparoscopic colorectal surgery.腹腔镜结直肠手术后切口疝的发生与预防
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2024 Jul 27;16(7):1973-1980. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i7.1973.
10
The clinical consequences of burst abdomen after emergency midline laparotomy: a prospective, observational cohort study.急诊中线剖腹术后发生腹部爆裂的临床后果:一项前瞻性观察性队列研究。
Hernia. 2024 Oct;28(5):1861-1870. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03104-x. Epub 2024 Jul 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Surgical wound misclassification: a multicenter evaluation.手术伤口分类错误:一项多中心评估
J Am Coll Surg. 2015 Mar;220(3):323-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.11.007. Epub 2014 Nov 20.
2
Incidence and risk factors of incisional hernia formation following abdominal organ transplantation.腹部器官移植术后切口疝形成的发生率及危险因素
Surg Endosc. 2015 Feb;29(2):398-404. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3682-8. Epub 2014 Aug 15.
3
Incidence of and risk factors for incisional hernia after abdominal surgery.腹部手术后切口疝的发生率和危险因素。
Br J Surg. 2014 Oct;101(11):1439-47. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9600. Epub 2014 Aug 14.
4
Patient awareness and symptoms from an incisional hernia.患者对切口疝的认知及症状
Int Surg. 2014 May-Jun;99(3):241-6. doi: 10.9738/INTSURG-D-14-00039.1.
5
Incisional hernia after liver transplantation: risk factors and health-related quality of life.肝移植术后切口疝:危险因素与健康相关生活质量
Clin Transplant. 2014 Jul;28(7):829-36. doi: 10.1111/ctr.12386. Epub 2014 Jun 12.
6
Outcomes of acute versus elective primary ventral hernia repair.急性与择期原发性腹侧疝修补术的结果比较。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014 Feb;76(2):523-8. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182ab0743.
7
Incisional hernia rate 3 years after midline laparotomy.中线剖腹术后 3 年的切口疝发生率。
Br J Surg. 2014 Jan;101(2):51-4. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9364. Epub 2013 Nov 26.
8
Meta-analysis of primary mesh augmentation as prophylactic measure to prevent incisional hernia.原发性补片增强术作为预防切口疝的预防措施的荟萃分析。
Dig Surg. 2013;30(4-6):401-9. doi: 10.1159/000355956. Epub 2013 Nov 5.
9
Risk factors for umbilical trocar site incisional hernia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective 3-year follow-up study.腹腔镜胆囊切除术脐部套管切口疝的危险因素:前瞻性 3 年随访研究。
Am J Surg. 2014 Jan;207(1):1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.05.010. Epub 2013 Oct 7.
10
Development and validation of a risk-stratification score for surgical site occurrence and surgical site infection after open ventral hernia repair.开发并验证了一种用于开放式腹疝修补术后手术部位发生和手术部位感染的风险分层评分。
J Am Coll Surg. 2013 Dec;217(6):974-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.08.003. Epub 2013 Sep 17.