• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

模块化锥形非骨水泥钛股骨柄在髋关节翻修术中的疗效

Outcome of a modular tapered uncemented titanium femoral stem in revision hip arthroplasty.

作者信息

Hoberg Maik, Konrads Christian, Engelien Jana, Oschmann Dorothee, Holder Michael, Walcher Matthias, Rudert Maximilian

机构信息

Orthopaedic Clinic Koenig-Ludwig-Haus, Center for Musculoskeletal Research, Julius-Maximilians-University Wuerzburg, Brettreichstr. 11, 97074, Wuerzburg, Germany,

出版信息

Int Orthop. 2015 Sep;39(9):1709-13. doi: 10.1007/s00264-015-2699-5. Epub 2015 Feb 18.

DOI:10.1007/s00264-015-2699-5
PMID:25690924
Abstract

PURPOSE

Revision hip arthroplasty using a modular tapered design gives the possibility for customising the prostheses to the individual anatomy intra-operatively. The success of this kind of surgery is still controversial due to the relative lack of medium- to long-term follow-up. Therefore we analysed the clinical and radiological outcome of the modular MRP-TITAN stem with diaphyseal fixation in revision hip surgery.

METHODS

In this retrospective study we included 136 consecutive patients with MRP-TITAN stem implanted during revision hip arthroplasty. The average follow-up was 55 months. For clinical evaluation we used the Harris Hip Score and the Merle d'Aubigné and Postel score. The health-related quality of life was determined with the visual analogue pain scale.

RESULTS

The surgeries were performed 109 months after primary total hip arthroplasty on average. The main indications for the MRP-TITAN revision stem were aseptic loosening, infection, and periprosthetic fracture. In the clinical outcome, patients achieved 75.1 points in the Harris Hip Score and 14.4 points in the Merle d'Aubigné and Postel Score. Mean level of persisting pain was 0.7 (VAS). The overall survival of the MRP stem in revision hip arthroplasty revealed 85.6% survival at 9.75 years' follow-up with a repeat revision rate of 6.8%.

CONCLUSIONS

Performing revision hip arthroplasty using the MRP-TITAN stem revealed a good clinical outcome. There is a tendency for better results in comparison with the information given in literature for cementless modular revision stems including a lower rate in re-revisions.

摘要

目的

采用模块化锥形设计的翻修髋关节置换术能够在术中根据个体解剖结构定制假体。由于相对缺乏中长期随访,这类手术的成功率仍存在争议。因此,我们分析了在翻修髋关节手术中采用骨干固定的模块化MRP-TITAN柄的临床和影像学结果。

方法

在这项回顾性研究中,我们纳入了136例在翻修髋关节置换术中植入MRP-TITAN柄的连续患者。平均随访时间为55个月。临床评估采用Harris髋关节评分以及Merle d'Aubigné和Postel评分。通过视觉模拟疼痛量表确定与健康相关的生活质量。

结果

手术平均在初次全髋关节置换术后109个月进行。MRP-TITAN翻修柄的主要适应证为无菌性松动、感染和假体周围骨折。在临床结果方面,患者的Harris髋关节评分为75.1分,Merle d'Aubigné和Postel评分为14.4分。持续疼痛的平均水平为0.7(视觉模拟疼痛量表)。在翻修髋关节置换术中,MRP柄的总体生存率在9.75年的随访中显示为85.6%,再次翻修率为6.8%。

结论

使用MRP-TITAN柄进行翻修髋关节置换术显示出良好的临床结果。与文献中给出的关于非骨水泥模块化翻修柄的信息相比,有取得更好结果的趋势,包括再次翻修率较低。

相似文献

1
Outcome of a modular tapered uncemented titanium femoral stem in revision hip arthroplasty.模块化锥形非骨水泥钛股骨柄在髋关节翻修术中的疗效
Int Orthop. 2015 Sep;39(9):1709-13. doi: 10.1007/s00264-015-2699-5. Epub 2015 Feb 18.
2
Similar outcomes between two-stage revisions for infection and aseptic hip revisions.感染性髋关节二期翻修与无菌性髋关节翻修的结果相似。
Int Orthop. 2016 Mar;40(3):459-64. doi: 10.1007/s00264-015-2850-3. Epub 2015 Jul 2.
3
Femoral revision in total hip arthroplasty using a cementless modular stem: clinical and radiological results with a 8-year follow-up.全髋关节置换术中使用非骨水泥模块化柄进行股骨翻修:8 年随访的临床和影像学结果。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Mar;144(3):1369-1377. doi: 10.1007/s00402-023-05066-8. Epub 2023 Oct 24.
4
High rate of fracture in the cementless modular Extrême™ (Mark I) femoral prosthesis in revision total hip arthroplasty: 33 cases at more than 5 years' follow-up.非骨水泥模块化 Extrême™(第一代)股骨假体在翻修全髋关节置换术中骨折率高:33 例超过 5 年随访。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2013 Dec;99(8):915-21. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2013.08.007. Epub 2013 Nov 7.
5
Revision of total hip arthroplasty by long locking stem with fully hydroxyapatite-coated modular metaphysis (Reef™): A continuous series of 78 cases at a minimum 2-year follow-up.全羟基磷灰石涂层模块化干骺端长锁钉翻修股骨柄(Reef™):78 例至少 2 年随访的连续病例系列。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2024 Apr;110(2):103786. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2023.103786. Epub 2023 Dec 7.
6
Tapered fluted titanium stems in the management of Vancouver B2 and B3 periprosthetic femoral fractures.变径锥形股骨柄在温哥华 B2 和 B3 型假体周围股骨骨折治疗中的应用。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Feb;472(2):590-8. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3087-3.
7
[Titanium modular revision prosthesis stem in revision hip prosthesis].
Orthopade. 2004 Jan;33(1):63-7. doi: 10.1007/s00132-003-0543-x.
8
Cementless modular hip revision arthroplasty using the MRP Titan Revision Stem: outcome of 79 hips after an average of 4 years' follow-up.使用MRP钛合金翻修柄的非骨水泥型模块化髋关节翻修置换术:79例髋关节平均随访4年后的结果
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2004 Jun;124(5):306-9. doi: 10.1007/s00402-004-0656-7. Epub 2004 Apr 3.
9
What Is the Difference Between Modular and Nonmodular Tapered Fluted Titanium Stems in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.翻修全髋关节置换术中模块化与非模块化锥形带槽钛柄的区别是什么。
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Oct;32(10):3108-3113. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.05.021. Epub 2017 May 18.
10
Long-term survivorship of a monoblock long cementless stem in revision total hip arthroplasty.单块式非骨水泥长柄假体在翻修全髋关节置换术中的长期生存研究。
Int Orthop. 2019 Oct;43(10):2279-2284. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-4186-2. Epub 2018 Oct 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Cumulative Risk for Periprosthetic Fracture and Operative Treatment Options After Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty with a Modular and Tapered Revision Device-A Consecutive Series of 117 Cases in a Mid-Term Duration.使用模块化锥形翻修装置进行翻修全髋关节置换术后假体周围骨折的累积风险及手术治疗选择——117例中期连续病例系列
J Clin Med. 2025 Jul 28;14(15):5321. doi: 10.3390/jcm14155321.
2
Extended Trochanteric Osteotomy Does Not Compromise Functional and Radiographic Outcomes of Femoral Stem Revisions with the Use of an Uncemented Modular Conical Stem.使用非骨水泥型模块化锥形柄进行股骨柄翻修时,大转子延长截骨术不会影响功能和影像学结果。
J Clin Med. 2024 Oct 4;13(19):5921. doi: 10.3390/jcm13195921.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Uncemented femoral revision arthroplasty using a modular tapered, fluted titanium stem: 5- to 16-year results of 163 cases.非骨水泥股骨翻修关节置换术采用模块化锥形、开槽钛合金柄:163 例 5 至 16 年的结果。
Acta Orthop. 2014 Dec;85(6):562-9. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2014.958809. Epub 2014 Sep 1.
2
Behaviour of the ultra-short anatomic cementless femoral stem in young and elderly patients.超短型解剖型非骨水泥股骨柄在年轻和老年患者中的应用。
Int Orthop. 2013 Dec;37(12):2323-30. doi: 10.1007/s00264-013-2044-9. Epub 2013 Aug 8.
3
Two-stage revision of an infected total hip arthroplasty: a follow-up of 136 patients.
Femoral revision in total hip arthroplasty using a cementless modular stem: clinical and radiological results with a 8-year follow-up.
全髋关节置换术中使用非骨水泥模块化柄进行股骨翻修:8 年随访的临床和影像学结果。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Mar;144(3):1369-1377. doi: 10.1007/s00402-023-05066-8. Epub 2023 Oct 24.
4
Is It Safe to Perform Revision Hip Arthroplasty Without Suction Drains?不使用引流管进行髋关节翻修置换术是否安全?
Cureus. 2023 May 30;15(5):e39682. doi: 10.7759/cureus.39682. eCollection 2023 May.
5
The Early- to Mid-term Outcome of Novel Cementless Modular Femoral Stem in East Asian Patients.新型非骨水泥模块化股骨柄在东亚患者中的早期至中期结果。
Clin Orthop Surg. 2023 Apr;15(2):211-218. doi: 10.4055/cios22197. Epub 2022 Oct 6.
6
Medium Term Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes Using a Modular Tapered Hip Revision Implant.使用模块化锥形髋关节翻修植入物的中期影像学和临床结果
Arthroplast Today. 2021 Apr 5;8:181-187. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2021.02.017. eCollection 2021 Apr.
7
Comparable outcomes of in-cement revision and uncemented modular stem revision for Vancouver B2 periprosthetic femoral fracture at 5 years.5 年随访结果显示,水泥型翻修与非水泥型模块化柄翻修治疗 Vancouver B2 型股骨假体周围骨折疗效相当。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022 Jun;142(6):1039-1046. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-03776-5. Epub 2021 Feb 11.
8
Promising results of revision total hip arthroplasty using a hexagonal, modular, tapered stem in cases of aseptic loosening.在无菌性松动的情况下,使用六边、模块化、锥形柄进行翻修全髋关节置换术取得了良好的效果。
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 23;15(6):e0233035. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233035. eCollection 2020.
9
Anchoring of a Kinked Uncemented Femoral Stem after Preparation with a Straight or a Kinked Reamer.直形或弯形扩孔器预扩后绞锁的非骨水泥股骨柄的固定
Orthop Surg. 2019 Aug;11(4):705-711. doi: 10.1111/os.12490. Epub 2019 Jul 22.
10
Long-term survivorship of a monoblock long cementless stem in revision total hip arthroplasty.单块式非骨水泥长柄假体在翻修全髋关节置换术中的长期生存研究。
Int Orthop. 2019 Oct;43(10):2279-2284. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-4186-2. Epub 2018 Oct 1.
感染性全髋关节置换术的两阶段翻修:136例患者的随访
Hip Int. 2013 Sep-Oct;23(5):445-50. doi: 10.5301/hipint.5000049. Epub 2013 Jun 17.
4
One hundred and fifty years of history of the Morse taper: from Stephen A. Morse in 1864 to complications related to modularity in hip arthroplasty.莫氏锥度的150年历史:从1864年的斯蒂芬·A·莫尔斯到髋关节置换术中与模块化相关的并发症
Int Orthop. 2013 Oct;37(10):2081-8. doi: 10.1007/s00264-013-1927-0. Epub 2013 May 30.
5
Impaction grafting in the femur in cementless modular revision total hip arthroplasty: a descriptive outcome analysis of 243 cases with the MRP-TITAN revision implant.非骨水泥模块化翻修全髋关节置换术中股骨嵌压植骨:采用 MRP-TITAN 翻修假体的 243 例病例的描述性结果分析。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013 Jan 11;14:19. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-14-19.
6
[What can be done when hip prostheses fail? : New trends in revision endoprosthetics].[髋关节假体失败时该怎么办?:翻修假体的新趋势]
Orthopade. 2011 Dec;40(12):1084-94. doi: 10.1007/s00132-011-1844-0.
7
A prospective study of hip revision surgery using the Exeter long-stem prosthesis: function, subsidence, and complications for 57 patients.一项使用 Exeter 长柄假体的髋关节翻修手术的前瞻性研究:57 例患者的功能、下沉和并发症。
J Orthop Traumatol. 2009 Dec;10(4):159-65. doi: 10.1007/s10195-009-0068-0. Epub 2009 Oct 24.
8
Short-term results of hip revisions with a curved cementless modular stem in association with the surgical approach.采用弯柄非骨水泥模块化柄并结合手术入路进行髋关节翻修术的短期结果
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2009 Jan;129(1):65-73. doi: 10.1007/s00402-008-0617-7. Epub 2008 Apr 4.
9
Radiographic bone regeneration and clinical outcome with the Wagner SL revision stem: a 5-year to 12-year follow-up study.使用瓦格纳SL翻修柄的影像学骨再生及临床结果:一项5年至12年的随访研究。
J Arthroplasty. 2007 Jun;22(4):515-24. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2006.04.029. Epub 2007 Mar 9.
10
[The morse taper junction in modular revision hip replacement].[模块化翻修髋关节置换术中的莫氏锥度连接]
Z Orthop Unfall. 2007 Mar-Apr;145(2):157-60. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-965182.