Suppr超能文献

通过乳果糖/呼气氢法和柳氮磺胺吡啶/磺胺吡啶法评估的口盲肠转运时间的比较。

Comparison of orocaecal transit times assessed by the lactulose/breath hydrogen and the sulphasalazine/sulphapyridine methods.

作者信息

Staniforth D H

机构信息

Clinical Pharmacology Unit, West Middlesex University Hospital, Isleworth.

出版信息

Gut. 1989 Jul;30(7):978-82. doi: 10.1136/gut.30.7.978.

Abstract

The lactulose/breath hydrogen and the sulphasalazine/sulphapyridine methods of assessing orocaecal transit time have been compared. In a two part crossover study in healthy normal subjects the median orocaecal transit time by the SLZ/SP method was 4.84 hours but only 2.92 hours by the lactulose/breath hydrogen method. Coadministration of lactulose and sulphazalazine to nine subjects with assessment of orocaecal transit time by hydrogen breath determination and plasma sulphapyridine assay gave orocaecal transit times of 2.33 and 2.25 hours respectively suggesting that the lactulose reduces transit time and that the lactulose/breath hydrogen method, which is so convenient to use, gives artificially low transit times. A third experiment was undertaken to compare the orocaecal transit times after 1.5 and 3.0 g sulphazalazine. The orocaecal transit times after the two doses were not statistically different.

摘要

对乳果糖/呼气氢法和柳氮磺胺吡啶/磺胺吡啶法评估口盲肠转运时间的方法进行了比较。在一项针对健康正常受试者的两部分交叉研究中,通过柳氮磺胺吡啶/磺胺吡啶法测得的口盲肠转运时间中位数为4.84小时,而通过乳果糖/呼气氢法测得的仅为2.92小时。对9名受试者同时给予乳果糖和柳氮磺胺吡啶,并通过呼气氢测定和血浆磺胺吡啶测定来评估口盲肠转运时间,结果分别为2.33小时和2.25小时,这表明乳果糖可缩短转运时间,且使用方便的乳果糖/呼气氢法得出的转运时间人为偏低。进行了第三个实验,比较服用1.5克和3.0克柳氮磺胺吡啶后的口盲肠转运时间。两剂药物后的口盲肠转运时间在统计学上无差异。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

7
Sugar intolerance: origin and mechanisms of symptoms?糖不耐受:症状的起源和机制?
Dig Dis Sci. 2002 Apr;47(4):886-93. doi: 10.1023/a:1014772907681.
8
Pharmacokinetic considerations in gastrointestinal motor disorders.胃肠运动障碍中的药代动力学考量
Clin Pharmacokinet. 1995 Jan;28(1):41-66. doi: 10.2165/00003088-199528010-00005.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验