Lowe Sarah R, Kwok Richard K, Payne Julianne, Engel Lawrence S, Galea Sandro, Sandler Dale P
Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University, Mailman School of Public Health, USA.
Epidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, USA.
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Apr;130:125-34. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.02.009. Epub 2015 Feb 12.
High rates of mental health (MH) problems have been documented among disaster relief workers. However, few workers utilize MH services, and predictors of service use among this group remain unexplored. The purpose of this study was to explore associations between predisposing, illness-related, and enabling factors from Andersen's behavioral model of treatment-seeking and patterns of service use among participants who completed at least one full day of cleanup work after the Deepwater Horizon oil spill and participated in home visits for the NIEHS GuLF STUDY (N = 8931). Workers reported on MH symptoms and whether they had used counseling or medication for MH problems since the oil spill. Hierarchical logistic regression models explored associations between predictors and counseling and medication use in the full sample, and type of use (counseling only, medication only, both) among participants who used either service. Analyses were replicated for subsamples of participants with and without symptom inventory scores suggestive of probable post-disaster mental illness. Having a pre-spill MH diagnosis, pre-spill service use, more severe post-spill MH symptoms, and healthcare coverage were positively associated with counseling and medication use in the full sample. Among participants who used either service, non-Hispanic Black race, pre-spill counseling, lower depression, and not identifying a personal doctor or healthcare provider were predictive of counseling only, whereas older age, female gender and pre-spill medication were predictive of medication only. The results were generally consistent among participants with and without probable post-disaster mental illness. The results suggest variability in which factors within Andersen's behavioral model are predictive of different patterns of service use among disaster relief workers.
救灾人员中心理健康(MH)问题的发生率较高,这已得到记录。然而,很少有工作人员利用心理健康服务,且这一群体中服务利用的预测因素仍未得到探索。本研究的目的是探讨在“深水地平线”漏油事件后完成至少一整天清理工作并参与美国国立环境卫生科学研究所海湾研究(NIEHS GuLF STUDY)家访的参与者中,安德森寻求治疗行为模型中的易患因素、疾病相关因素和促成因素与服务利用模式之间的关联(N = 8931)。工作人员报告了心理健康症状,以及自漏油事件以来他们是否因心理健康问题使用过咨询服务或药物治疗。分层逻辑回归模型探讨了预测因素与整个样本中咨询和药物使用之间的关联,以及使用任何一种服务的参与者的使用类型(仅咨询、仅药物、两者都用)。对有和没有提示可能患有灾后精神疾病的症状清单分数的参与者子样本重复进行了分析。在整个样本中,灾难前有心理健康诊断、灾难前使用过服务、灾后更严重的心理健康症状以及医疗保险与咨询和药物使用呈正相关。在使用任何一种服务的参与者中,非西班牙裔黑人种族、灾难前咨询、较低的抑郁水平以及未指定私人医生或医疗服务提供者仅能预测咨询服务的使用,而年龄较大、女性以及灾难前使用过药物仅能预测药物的使用。在可能患有灾后精神疾病和未患有灾后精神疾病的参与者中,结果总体一致。结果表明,安德森行为模型中的哪些因素可预测救灾人员不同的服务利用模式存在差异。