Haase Rachel, Michie Marsha, Skinner Debra
Department of Anthropology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Center for Genomics and Society, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Institute for Health & Aging, University of California San Francisco, USA; Center for Genomics and Society, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Soc Sci Med. 2015 Apr;130:146-53. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.02.016. Epub 2015 Feb 13.
Genomic research has rapidly expanded its scope and ambition over the past decade, promoted by both public and private sectors as having the potential to revolutionize clinical medicine. This promissory bioeconomy of genomic research and technology is generated by, and in turn generates, the hopes and expectations shared by investors, researchers and clinicians, patients, and the general public alike. Examinations of such bioeconomies have often focused on the public discourse, media representations, and capital investments that fuel these "regimes of hope," but also crucial are the more intimate contexts of small-scale medical research, and the private hopes, dreams, and disappointments of those involved. Here we examine one local site of production in a university-based clinical research project that sought to identify novel cancer predisposition genes through whole genome sequencing in individuals at high risk for cancer. In-depth interviews with 24 adults who donated samples to the study revealed an ability to shift flexibly between positioning themselves as research participants on the one hand, and as patients or as family members of patients, on the other. Similarly, interviews with members of the research team highlighted the dual nature of their positions as researchers and as clinicians. For both parties, this dual positioning shaped their investment in the project and valuing of its possible outcomes. In their narratives, all parties shifted between these different relational positions as they managed hopes and expectations for the research project. We suggest that this flexibility facilitated study implementation and participation in the face of potential and probable disappointment on one or more fronts, and acted as a key element in the resilience of this local promissory bioeconomy. We conclude that these multiple dimensions of relationality and positionality are inherent and essential in the creation of any complex economy, "bio" or otherwise.
在过去十年中,基因组研究在公共和私营部门的推动下迅速扩大了其范围和目标,被认为有潜力彻底改变临床医学。基因组研究与技术的这种充满希望的生物经济是由投资者、研究人员、临床医生、患者以及普通大众共同的希望和期望所催生的,反过来又产生了这些希望和期望。对这种生物经济的研究往往侧重于推动这些“希望机制”的公众话语、媒体呈现和资本投资,但小规模医学研究的更私密背景以及相关人员的个人希望、梦想和失望也至关重要。在这里,我们考察了一个基于大学的临床研究项目中的一个本地生产场所,该项目旨在通过对癌症高危个体进行全基因组测序来识别新的癌症易感基因。对24名向该研究捐赠样本的成年人进行的深入访谈显示,他们一方面能够灵活地将自己定位为研究参与者,另一方面又能定位为患者或患者家属。同样,对研究团队成员的访谈突出了他们作为研究人员和临床医生的双重身份。对双方来说,这种双重定位塑造了他们对项目的投入以及对其可能结果的重视。在他们的叙述中,所有各方在管理对研究项目的希望和期望时,都在这些不同的关系位置之间转换。我们认为,这种灵活性在面对一个或多个方面潜在和可能的失望时促进了研究的实施和参与,并成为这种本地充满希望的生物经济韧性的关键因素。我们得出结论,这些关系性和定位性的多个维度在任何复杂经济(“生物”或其他)的创造中都是固有的且至关重要的。