Chighizola C B, Andreoli L, de Jesus G Ramires, Banzato A, Pons-Estel G J, Erkan D
Experimental Laboratory of Immunological and Rheumatologic Researches, Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Lupus. 2015 Aug;24(9):980-4. doi: 10.1177/0961203315572714. Epub 2015 Feb 18.
In a previous systematic literature search, we demonstrated that the frequencies of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) in general-population patients with pregnancy morbidity (PM), deep vein thrombosis (DVT), myocardial infarction (MI), and stroke (ST) are 6%, 10%, 11%, and 14%. To determine the association between aPL and clinical outcomes, we conducted a follow-up analysis of the 120 studies included in the original paper. Based on the analysis of 81 studies, a significant difference in the frequency of aPL criteria tests between patients and controls emerged considering all the outcomes together (10% versus 3%). In particular, a significant difference was reported for overall PM, pregnancy loss (PrL), late PrL, severe preeclampsia (PEC), ST, MI, and DVT. No difference emerged for early PrL, intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR), PEC, eclampsia (EC), and HELLP. A positive association was found in more than half of the studies for overall PrL, severe PEC, HELLP, ST, MI, and DVT and in less than half for early and late PrL, PEC, EC, and IUGR. The positive association between aPL and clinical outcomes included in the antiphospholipid syndrome classification criteria is not supported by every study, being particularly inconsistent for early PL, IUGR, PEC, EC, and HELLP.
在之前的一项系统性文献检索中,我们发现,在患有妊娠并发症(PM)、深静脉血栓形成(DVT)、心肌梗死(MI)和中风(ST)的普通人群患者中,抗磷脂抗体(aPL)的出现频率分别为6%、10%、11%和14%。为了确定aPL与临床结局之间的关联,我们对原始论文中纳入的120项研究进行了随访分析。基于对81项研究的分析,综合考虑所有结局时,患者与对照组之间aPL标准检测频率出现了显著差异(10%对3%)。具体而言,在总体PM、妊娠丢失(PrL)、晚期PrL、重度子痫前期(PEC)、ST、MI和DVT方面报告了显著差异。在早期PrL、胎儿生长受限(IUGR)、PEC、子痫(EC)和溶血、肝酶升高和血小板减少(HELLP)方面未发现差异。在超过一半的研究中发现aPL与总体PrL、重度PEC、HELLP、ST、MI和DVT呈正相关,而在不到一半的研究中发现aPL与早期和晚期PrL、PEC、EC和IUGR呈正相关。并非每项研究都支持抗磷脂综合征分类标准中所包含的aPL与临床结局之间的正相关,在早期PL、IUGR、PEC、EC和HELLP方面尤其不一致。