Piedmont Silke, Robra Bernt-Peter
Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Institute for Social Medicine and Health Economics, Magdeburg, Germany.
GMS Z Med Ausbild. 2015 Feb 11;32(1):Doc8. doi: 10.3205/zma000950. eCollection 2015.
The aim of this article is to compare students of human medicine (HM) with students specialising in the MINT disciplines (mathematics, computer science, natural sciences and engineering), the humanities and social sciences as well as law and economic sciences with regard to their expectations of their university study and career and the areas of competence where they feel they have been supported by their education. We present in detail issues particularly relevant to prospective physicians, which are discussed with the main focus on the "theoretical and practical orientation of medical education".
We used the database in the Public Use File of the "11th Student Survey", a written survey of randomly selected students studying at 25 German tertiary institutions during the 2009/2010 winter term, which was supplied by the Tertiary Education Research working group at the University of Constance. Data on 7536 students was included, of which 488 (6.5%) were prospective physicians.
Human medicine students have a clear career aim and want to complete their education quickly. They have a far above-average interest in working with and for people. About one student in two is interested in a career in science or research (53% in each case - close to the average for all subjects). Compared with the other disciplines, HM students are most likely to consider their university education to have practical and research relevance and are most likely to feel prepared for their profession. Yet over half of all students (Ø 53.3%; HM 54.5%) do not consider their education to have fostered their research skills. MINT students in particular are better able to enhance their skills through independent experimentation, while theory and practice are more likely to be communicated academically in the regular teaching of human medicine. Accordingly, the HM students feel less well supported in some areas of competence required for their later work than students in other disciplines, in developing independence, problem-solving ability, critical ability and capacity for teamwork for example.
The high expectations held by human medicine students of being prepared for practical work with/on people are met to an above-average degree according to their assessments of the "practical relevance" and "career preparation" offered by their medical education. However the perceived development of skills in theory and practice does not respond sufficiently well to the demands of the complex, responsible profession they aspire to. Medical students should be better supported in developing both practical and academic independence.
本文旨在比较医学专业(HM)学生与MINT学科(数学、计算机科学、自然科学和工程学)、人文社会科学以及法律和经济科学专业的学生在大学学习及职业期望方面的差异,以及他们认为在哪些能力领域得到了教育支持。我们详细阐述了与未来医生特别相关的问题,主要围绕“医学教育的理论与实践导向”展开讨论。
我们使用了“第十一次学生调查”公共使用文件中的数据库,该调查是对2009/2010冬季学期在25所德国高等院校随机抽取的学生进行的书面调查,由康斯坦茨大学高等教育研究工作组提供。纳入了7536名学生的数据,其中488名(6.5%)是未来的医生。
医学专业学生有明确的职业目标,希望快速完成学业。他们对与人共事及为他人工作有着远超平均水平的兴趣。约二分之一的学生对从事科学或研究职业感兴趣(每种情况均为53%,接近所有学科的平均水平)。与其他学科相比,医学专业学生最有可能认为其大学教育具有实践和研究相关性,也最有可能觉得自己为职业做好了准备。然而,超过半数的学生(平均为53.3%;医学专业为54.5%)认为他们的教育并未培养其研究技能。特别是MINT专业的学生能够通过独立实验更好地提升技能,而在医学专业的常规教学中,理论与实践更倾向于通过学术方式进行传授。因此,与其他学科的学生相比,医学专业学生在其后续工作所需的某些能力领域,如培养独立性、解决问题的能力、批判性思维能力和团队合作能力方面,感觉得到的支持较少。
根据医学专业学生对医学教育所提供的“实践相关性”和“职业准备”的评估来看,他们对为与人共事或为人服务的实际工作做好准备的高期望得到了高于平均水平的满足。然而,他们在理论和实践技能培养方面的感知发展,对他们所期望从事的复杂、责任重大的职业的要求回应得不够充分。应该更好地支持医学生培养实践和学术独立性。